- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:2
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:2
|
|
|
2017, vol. 8, br. 1, str. 34-48
|
|
Status ugovora o stranim investicijama tokom ponovnih pregovora države prijema investicije i stranog investitora
Foreign investment contract status during the renegotiation of host state and foreign investor
Projekat: Zaštita ljudskih i manjinskih prava u evropskom pravnom prostoru (MPNTR - 179046)
Sažetak
U radu je pokušano da se ukaže na to kakav je uticaj ponovnih pregovora na obaveze ugovornih strana iz ugovora o stranim investicijama. Ponovno pregovaranje doprinosi održavanju ugovora na snazi, ali može biti shvaćeno i kao signal da postoje značajne teškoće u sprovođenju ugovora. Podnošenje zahteva za pokretanje ponovnih pregovora može imati snažan psihološki uticaj na ugovornu stranu kojoj je taj zahtev upućen. Navedeni zahtev može biti shvaćen kao znak da će uskoro prestati sprovođenje ugovora. Zbog toga je neophodno da se pruži jasno uveravanje da će se sa sprovođenjem ugovora o stranim investicijama nastaviti tokom ponovnih pregovora. Primarni cilj rada je da se ukaže na činjenicu da ponovni pregovori ne mogu biti shvaćeni kao alibi za izbegavanje ugovornih i drugih obaveza, nastalih iz stranih investicija. Pored toga, u radu će biti ukazano i na određena odstupanja od principa doslednog sprovođenja ugovora tokom ponovnih pregovora. Pomenuta odstupanja moraju biti restriktivno tumačena i kontrolisano primenjivana.
Abstract
Contracts concluded between foreign investors and investment host state are the main instruments used to promote foreign investment, regulate and normative design them. An important element of the contract on foreign investments is a renegotiation clause, which allows the investment host state and foreign investor to start renegotiation, after the contract has been concluded. This paper attempts to point out the impact of renegotiations on the obligations of the parties under the contract on foreign investments. Though the renegotiation contributes to maintaining contract in force, it may be perceived as a sign that there are significant difficulties in contract enforcement. Giving a notion to start renegotiations can have a powerful psychological effect on the counterparty to which the request is addressed. Mentioned notion can be understood as a sign that the contract will soon be breached. Therefore, it is necessary to provide clear assurance that the implementation of contract will continue during the renegotiation. The primary objective of the study is to highlight the fact that the renegotiations can not be understood as an alibi to avoid contractual and other obligations arising from foreign investment. In addition, in this paper there will be pointed out at a certain exceptions from the principle of consistent implementation of the contract during the renegotiation. The aforementioned exceptions must be restrictively interpreted and applied with full control.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
*** (2015-2016) Zakon o izvršenju i obezbeđenju. Sl. glasnik RS, br. 106/15, 106/16
|
|
|
*** (2014) Zakon o parničnom postupku. Sl. glasnik RS, br. 55/14
|
|
|
Andrews, G.M., Millett, R. (2000) Law of Guarantees. London: Sweet & Maxwell
|
|
|
Chern, C. (2015) Dispute boards: Practice and procedure. Taylor & Francis, 3rd edition
|
|
1
|
Cvetković, P. (2015) Pravo javno privatnih partnerstava. Niš: Pravni fakultet
|
|
16
|
Dolzer, R., Schreuer, C. (2008) Principles of International Investment Law. Oxford University Press
|
|
|
Doonan, E., Foster, C. (2000) Cavendish legal skills series: Drafting. London - Sydney: Cavendish Publishing, 2nd edition
|
|
6
|
Douglas, Z. (2009) The international law of investment claims. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
|
|
|
Francioni, F. (2009) Access to Justice, Denial of Justice and International Investment Law. European Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, No. 3
|
|
|
Guasch, J. L. (2004) Granting and Renegotiating Infrastructure Concessions. Washington, DC: World Bank
|
|
1
|
Holden, R., Malani, A. (2014) Renegotiation Design by Contract. University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 81, p. 153, 154
|
|
|
Mitchell, C. (2007) Interpretation of Contracts: Current Controversies in Law. London-New York: Taylor & Francis
|
|
1
|
Qurashi, A.Z.A. (2005) Renegotiation of International Petroleum Agreements. Journal of International Arbitration, 22 (4):
|
|
|
Salacuse, J. (2000) Renegotiating International Project Agreements. Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 24, Issue 4
|
|
3
|
Sornarajah, M. (2015) Resistance and Change in the International Law on Foreign Investment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
|
|
|
UNCITRAL (1988) Legal guide on drawing up international contracts for the construction of industrial works. New York: United Nations
|
|
|
UNCTAD (2004) State contracts: UNCTAD series on issues in international investment agreements. New York - Geneva: United Nations
|
|
|
UNCTAD (2010) Investor - state disputes: Prevention and alternatives to arbitration. u: UNCTAD Series on International Investment Policies for Development, New York - Geneva: United Nations
|
|
|
UNCTAD, Franck, D.S., Joubin-Bret, A., ur. (2011) Investor - state disputes: Prevention and alternatives to arbitration II. u: Proceedings of the Washington and Lee University and UNCTAD Joint Symposium on International Investment and Alternative Dispute Resolution, held on 29 March 2010 in Lexington, Virginia, USA, New York - Geneva: United Nations
|
|
|
|
|