- citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:36
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:5
|
|
|
2018, vol. 66, br. 1, str. 218-235
|
|
Uticaj prestanka ugovora na stečeno pravo svojine pribavioca i trećeg lica u srpskom pravu
Influence of the contract termination on the acquired ownership of acquirer and third party in Serbian law
Projekat: Projekat Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu : Identitetski preobražaj Srbije
Sažetak
Predmet ovog rada je ispitivanje opravdanosti primene načela kauzalne tradicije u situaciji kada ugovor kao osnov sticanja prestane da postoji, nakon što je došlo do predaje/upisa u registar nepokretnosti, te i njegov uticaj na položaj trećih lica na koja je sporno pravo svojine preneto. Gotovo je jednoglasno prihvaćeno stanovište da opstanak prava svojine trećeg lica zavisi od njegove savesnosti. Tu počinje, ali se, uglavnom, i završava odgovor na to pitanje. Na njega se stavlja tačka bez dalje analize. Međutim, pitanja se otvaraju, a nelogičnosti nameću same. Prvo, kako se shvata savesnost trećeg lica, odnosno, kada je on savestan, a kada ne? Drugo, u kom trenutku se ispituje savesnost trećeg? Treće, po nama je najinteresantnije, a možda i najbitnije pitanje da li je uopšte savesnost trećeg bitna za opstanak već stečenog prava.
Abstract
It is indisputable that the principle of causal tradition can be applied at the time of acquisition of ownership. Also, in case of delivery/registration based on non-existent/invalid contract, it will be indisputable obligation of the acquirer to return the thing i.e. it will be followed by removal of the entered right in the register. The same will be in the case when the termination of the contract occurred after delivery/registration, but only if the acquirer did not transfer its ownership. However, if the legal ground - the contract has ceased to exist after registration and ownership transferred to a third party, the situation changes significantly. The scene has been entered by a person who has fulfilled the conditions and thus has become the owner. Termination of the contract as the basis for the acquisition of his predecessor, despite the principle of causal tradition, cannot affect the acquired rights of third parties. A widely accepted view of good faith of the third party as a criterion for determining the impact of contract termination to the acquired ownership is considered absolutely unacceptable.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
1 
|
Beale, H.G., ur. (2012) Chitty on contracts. London: Sweet & Maxwell, I
|
|
|
Bergel, J.L., Bruschi, M., Cimamonti, S. (2010) Les Biens. u: Ghestin J. [ur.] Traite de droit civil, Paris: L.G.D.J
|
|
46
|
Blagojević, B.T., Krulj, V., ur. (1983) Komentar Zakona o obligacionim odnosima. Beograd: Savremena administracija, druga knjiga
|
|
|
Bucher, E. (2004) Law of Contracts. u: F. Dessemontet, T. Ansay [ur.] Introduction to Swiss Law, The Hague, Boston, London: Kluwer Law International
|
|
|
Dolović-Bojić, K. (2016) Pravne posledice izjave volje usmerene na raskid ugovora zbog neizvršenja. Beograd
|
|
|
Đorđević, Lj. (1977) Obligaciono pravo. Beograd
|
|
2
|
Đorđević, Ž., Stanković, V. (1976) Obligaciono pravo - opšti deo. Beograd
|
|
|
Foëx, B., Marchand, S. (2011) National reports on the transfer of movables in Switzerland. u: Faber W., Lurger B. [ur.] National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Volume 6: The Netherlands, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Malta, Latvia, Munich
|
|
6
|
Gams, A. (1980) Osnovi stvarnog prava. Beograd
|
|
23
|
Gavella, N., Josipović, T., Gliha, I., Belaj, V., Stipković, Z. (2007) Stvarno pravo. Zagreb: Informator
|
|
2
|
Gorenc, V. (2014) Komentar zakona o obveznim odnosima. Zagreb
|
|
|
Hadžimanović, N. (2012) Kritički prilog o pitanju mogućnosti nekauzalnog i neakcesornog uređenja prava obezbeđenja - istovremeno ispitivanje. Nova pravna revija, br. 2
|
|
|
Josipović, T. (2013) Property Law and Trust Law: Croatia. Kluwer Law International
|
|
|
Konstantinović, M. (1989) Prema beleškama sa predavanja. Beograd
|
|
6
|
Kuštrimović-Kovačević, R., Lazić, M. (2009) Stvarno pravo. Niš
|
|
1
|
Larroumet, C. (2006) Droit civil: Les biens. u: Droits réels principaux, Paris, Tome II
|
|
|
Lazarević, D. (2012) Komentar Zakona o osnovama svojinskopravnih odnosa. Beograd
|
|
|
Malaurie, M. (1991) Le Restitutions en Droit Civil. Paris
|
|
|
Malaurie, P., Aynes, L. (2010) Les biens. Paris
|
|
|
Mathieu, M-L. (2013) Droit civil, Les biens. Paris: Dalloz
|
|
|
Mcguire, M.-R. (2011) National reports on the transfer of movables in Germany. u: Faber W., Lurger B. [ur.] National Reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe: Volume 3, German, Greece, Lithuania, Hungary, Munich
|
|
22
|
Perović, S. (1980) Obligaciono pravo. Beograd
|
|
17
|
Radišić, J. (2014) Obligaciono pravo. Niš
|
|
|
Smith, L.D. (2000) Restitution. Great Britain
|
|
58
|
Stanković, O.D., Orlić, M.V. (2009) Stvarno pravo. Beograd: Nomos
|
|
1
|
Starck, B. (1972) Droit civil. Paris, Obligations, 2. Contrat et quasi - contrat
|
|
2
|
Treitel, G.H. (1988) Remedies for breach of contract: A comparative account
|
|
4
|
Treitel, G.H. (2007) The law of contract. London
|
|
4
|
Vizner, B. (1978) Komentar Zakona o obveznim odnosima. Zagreb, član 157
|
|
2
|
Vodinelić, V. (2012) Građansko pravo, Uvod u građansko pravo i Opšti deo građanskog prava. Beograd
|
|
|
von Segesser, G. (2016) Property and Trust Law. Switzerland: Kluwer Law International
|
|
|
Whittaker, S. (2010) La résolution suite a une inexécution contractuelle et ses conséquences: Regards comparatistes sur l'avant - projet de reforme du droit des obligations et de la prescription. Paris
|
|
|
Živković, M. (2004) Promene stvarnog prava u Srbiji. Beograd
|
|
4   
|
Živković, M. (2015) Acquisition of ownership of real property by contract in Serbian law: Departing from the titulus-modus system?. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 63, br. 3, str. 112-126
|
|
|
|
|