- citati u SCIndeksu: [3]
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:7
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:4
|
|
2018, vol. 64, br. 4, str. 47-55
|
Održivi razvoj srpske prerađivačke industrije
Sustainable development of the Serbian manufacturing industry
Projekat: Uloga države u novom modelu rasta privrede Srbije (MPNTR - 179065)
Sažetak
Strukturne promene su ključne za održivi industrijski razvoj. Cilj rada je da ukaže da bi strukturne promene srpske prerađivačke industrije trebale da budu praćene rastom proizvodne specijalizacije i učešća proizvoda sa najvišim nivoom tehnološke intenzivnosti, kako bi došlo do rasta konkurentnosti. Za potrebe analize strukturnih promena koristi se komparativni metod, za analizu proizvodne specijalizacije indeks specijalizacije industrijskog sektora, a za analizu konkurentnosti indeks otkrivenih komparativnih prednosti. Prerađivačka industrija je najvažniji sektor ekonomije Srbije u kome i pored rasta specijalizacija nije visoka, što utiče da ovaj sektor ne ostvaruje komparativne prednosti i nije konkurentan na tržištu EU. Rad je može biti od pomoći kreatorima industrijske politike, kako bi se odredio najbolji put ka održivom industrijskom razvoju, koristeći prednosti proizvodne specijalizacije.
Abstract
Structural changes are crucial for sustainable industrial development. The aim of the paper is to point out that structural changes in the Serbian manufacturing industry should be accompanied by growth in production specialization and the share of high technology products in order to increase competitiveness. For the analysis of structural changes, a comparative method is used, to analyze production specialization, industrial sector specialization index, and for the analysis of competitiveness, the revealed comparative advantage index. The manufacturing industry is the most important sector of the Serbian economy, and, despite growth, specialization in this field is not high, which affects the lack of comparative advantages and uncompetitiveness of this sector on the EU market. The paper can be of assistance to industrial policy makers, in order to determine the best path to sustainable industrial development, using the benefits of production specialization.
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
Aiginger, K. (2000) Specialisation of European manufacturing. Austrian Economic Quarterly, 2(2000): 82-92
|
3
|
Aiginger, K., Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2006) Specialization and concentration: a note on theory and evidence. Empirica, 33(4): 255-266
|
|
Bachtler, J. (2017) Towards cohesion policy 4.O: Structural transformation and inclusive growth. Regional Studies Association, 1-46
|
9
|
Balassa, B. (1965) Trade Liberalisation and 'Revealed' Comparative Advantage. Manchester School, 33(2): 99-123
|
|
Boeheim, M., Handler, H., Ketels, C., Palmberg, C., Török, Á. (2005) Towards a renewed industrial policy in Europe
|
|
European Commission (2011) EU industrial structure 2011: Trends and performance. Luxembourg: Office of the European Union, doi: 10.2769/28487
|
1
|
Eurostat (2018) Statistical databases. 30. August, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
|
1
|
Foray, D. (2013) Smart specialisation and the new industrial policy agenda. Policy Brief, (8), 1-15
|
|
Foster-Mcgregor, N., Kaba, I., Szirmai, A. (2015) Structural change and the ability to sustain growth. u: Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development Working Paper Series, 19, Viena, 19
|
|
Haraguchi, N., Cheng, C.F.C., Smeets, E. (2017) The Importance of Manufacturing in Economic Development: Has This Changed?. World Development, 93: 293-315
|
4
|
Hausmann, R., Rodrik, D. (2003) Economic development as self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72(2), 603-33
|
3
|
Imbs, J., Wacziarg, R. (2003) Stages of Diversification. American Economic Review, 93(1): 63-86
|
2
|
McCann, P., Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015) Smart Specialization, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 49(8): 1291-1302
|
|
Mićić, V., Savić, L., Radičić, D. (2018) Nivo proizvodne specijalizacije - Srbija i nove članice EU. Industrija, vol. 46, br. 1, str. 79-95
|
|
Obstfeld, M. (2012) International Finance. u: Durlauf, Steven N.; Blume, Lawrence E. [ur.] The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2012 Version, Basingstoke: Springer Nature
|
|
Romano, L., Traù, F. (2017) The nature of industrial development and the speed of structural change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 42: 26-37
|
1
|
Russu, C. (2015) Industrial Specialization of the European Union Member Countries. Economic Insights-Trends & Challenges, 67(2): 63-73
|
1
|
Saboniene, A. (2009) Lithuanian export competitiveness: comparison with other Baltic States. Engineering Economics, 62(2): 49-57
|
3
|
Szirmai, A. (2012) Industrialisation as an engine of growth in developing countries, 1950-2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4): 406-420
|
|
UNIDO (2017) Competitive industrial performance report 2016: The industrial competitiveness of nations looking back, forging ahead. Vienna: Vienna International Centre UNIDO, p. 4
|
1
|
UNIDO (2015) Industrial development report 2016: The role of technology and innovation in inclusive and sustainable industrial development. Vienna, 28
|
1
|
Upadhyaya, S., Yeganeh, S.M. (2015) Competitive industrial performance report 2014: Research, statistics and industrial policy branch. Working paper series, UNIDO, 12/2014, 2-8
|
|
Warwick, K. (2013) Industrial policy: Emerging issues and new trends. doi: org/10.1787/5k4869clw0xp-en
|
|
|
|