2013, iss. 43-2, pp. 407-424
|
|
Discourse on the incomprehensible in philosophy
Rasprava o nerazumljivosti filosofije
University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Serbia
email: aleksandarpet1@gmail.com
Keywords: philosophical concepts; expression and terminology; things of thinking; misology
Ključne reči: Filosofski pojmovi; govor i terminologija; stvari mišljenja; mizologija
Abstract
Philosophy has its roots in history as a thought and consideration about things of heaven and earth, about their interplay and sense, as their logos. The meaning of life still concerns human kind. Archaic thinking has been sharpened and perfected through time, while the development brought about deep rooted terminology, as well as the key concepts that reflect a specific and marked approach to thinking. Concepts that are expressed by words also belong to the realm of things; therefore, their correlation sets the history of the deliberation on the content of thinking. The expression of a mature thought implies that the obstacles have been removed from the path to wisdom which can often lead sideways. Hegel describes a sharpened critical thought, but also expresses the need for further development of philosophical thought. Misologic statements that are common even today use those sideways to show that philosophy is barren and unnecessary. However, can expression of things that concern us all ever be boring and superfluous? This can only be answered by a philosopher.
Sažetak
Filosofija je istorijski nastala kao mišljenje i razmišljanje o stvarima neba i zemlje, njihovoj uzajamnoj igri i smislu, kao njihov logos. Govor o stvarima smisla života i danas se najpre tiče čoveka. Arhajsko mišljenje je izoštravano i usavršavano tokom vremena, a razvoj je podrazumevao sve snažnije utvrđivanu terminologiju, kao i izdvajanje ključnih reči koje obeležavaju naročit i eminentan pristup stvarima mišljenja. Pojmovi koji se označavaju rečima istovremeno su i oni koji pripadaju stvarima, tako da je njihovo međusobno odnošenje svojevrsan istorijat promišljanja sadržaja samog mišljenja. Izlaganje stasalog mišljenja podrazumeva i uklone na putu prema mudrosti koji je brdovit i podrazumeva i stranšutice. Kod Hegela nailazimo na izoštreno kritičko mišljenje, ali i ukazivanje na potrebu za daljom negom filosofskog mišljenja. Mizološki stav, koji nije ni danas retka pojava, upotrebljava moguća zabasavanja kao dokaz da je sama filosofija jalova i nepotrebna. Međutim, da li sam govor o stvarima koje se tiču svih nas ikada može da bude dosadan i nepotreban, teško da će moći suvislo da odgonetne bilo ko, a ko se već i sam ne bavi filosofijom.
|