kako citirati ovaj članak
podeli ovaj članak


  • citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:5
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:0


članak: 3 od 6  
Back povratak na rezultate
2016, vol. 49, br. 2, str. 129-148
The investigation of the manipulation with scores on amoral dimension of the HEDONICA inventory
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
aUniverzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju
bUniverzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Odeljenje za psihologiju

Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. ON 17901

Ključne reči: faking; personality inventory; intelligence; self'-concept; social desirability
(ne postoji na srpskom)
Faking on Amoral dimension of the HEDONICA personality inventory was incited by the context simulation instructions: fake good (S2), fake bad (S3) and be honest (S1). Simultaneously, under instruction S1, the scores of respondents were measured on the Amoral facets of Self-concept scale (GSC), the Balanced social desirability scale (BIDR) and the cognitive tests of the fluid (IT2, ALF and RM) and the crystallized (AL4, vocabulary and GSN) intelligence, supposed (Morality), or known from the literature, as possible faking determinants. The score differences on Amoral dimension facets were calculated for S2 and for S3 situations using as a baseline the score in S1 situation. The score differences between S3 and S1 situations (abbreviated as FB) were found to be larger than the ones between S2 and S1 situations (abbreviated as FG). This result indicated that a) Amoral is susceptible to faking, and b) in S3, rather than in S2 situation, respondents displayed higher tendency of faking, or in other words, they incline to make worse rather than good presentation of themselves. The Projection facet of Amoral was most sensitive toward faking. These differences are found to be correlated with the Morality dimension of Self- concept scale and the fluid intelligence factor, but not with the dimensions of Social desirability scale in both situation for almost all faking scores on Amoral facets. Only Brutality was not related to the Morality, and Viciousness was not related to the Gf. This indicated that the dimension Morality of the Self-concept scale is far more correlated with the Amoral dimension of the HEDONICA personality scale than with the Social desirability scale.
Ashton, M.C., Lee, K. (2007) Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Advantages of the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2): 150-166
Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R.E., di Blas, L., Boies, K., Boele, D.R. (2004) A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2): 356
Baumeister, R.F. (1993) Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self regard. New York: Plenum Press
Book, A.S., Holden, R.R., Starzyk, K.B., Wasylkiw, L., Edwards, M.J. (2006) Psychopathic traits and experimentally induced deception in self-report assessment. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(4): 601-608
Brown, J.D. (1986) Evaluations of Self and Others: Self-Enhancement Biases in Social Judgments. Social Cognition, 4(4): 353-376
Burns, N.G., Christiansen, N.D. (2011) Methods of Measuring Faking Behavior. Human Performance, 358-372; 24
Cattell, R.B. (1971) Abilities: Their structure, growth and action. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin
Christiansen, N.D., Burns, G.N., Montgomery, G.E. (2005) Reconsidering Forced-Choice Item Formats for Applicant Personality Assessment. Human Performance, 18(3): 267-307
Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale-London, itd: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Cohen, J. (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1): 155-159
Costa, P.T., Mccrae, R.R. (1992) Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources
Crowne, D.P., Marlowe, D. (1960) A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol, 24: 349-54
de Vries, R.E., Zettler, I., Hilbig, B.E. (2013) Rethinking Trait Conceptions of Social Desirability Scales: Impression Management as an Expression of Honesty-Humility. Assessment, 21(3): 286-299
Edens, J.F., Buffington, J.K., Tomicic, T.L., Riley, B.D. (2001) Effects of positive impression management on the Psychopathic Personality Inventory. Law and Human Behavior, 25(3): 235-256
Emmons, R.A. (1984) Factor Analysis and Construct Validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory\. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3): 291-300
Eysenck, H.J., Eysenck, S.B.G. (1975) Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service
Galić, Z., Jerneić, Ž., Prevendar, T. (2008) Socijalno poželjno odgovaranje, ličnost i inteligencija u selekcijskoj situaciji. Psihologijske teme, 17(1); 93-110
Goffin, R.D., Boyd, A.C. (2009) Faking and personality assessment in personnel selection: Advancing models of faking. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 50(3): 151-160
Goldberg, L.R. (1993) The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American psychologist, 48(1): 26-34
Griffith, R.L., Malm, T., English, A., Yoshitta, Y., Gujar, A. (2006) Applicant faking behavior. Testing appart the influence of situational variance, cognitive biases and individual differences. u: Griffith R.L., Peterson M.H. [ur.] A closer examination of applicant faking behavior, Greenwich, CT: Information Age, pp. 151-178
Griffith, R.L., Peterson, M.H. (2011) One Piece at a Time: The Puzzle of Applicant Faking and a Call for Theory. Human Performance, 24(4): 291-301
Hare, R. (1998) The hare PCL-R: Some issues concerning its use and misuse. Legal and Criminological Psychology, vol. 3
Holden, R.R., Book, A.S. (2011) Faking Does Distort Self-Report Personality Assessment. u: M. Ziegler, C. MacCann & R. D., Roberts [ur.] New Perspectives on Faking in Personality Assessment, New York: Oxford University Press, str. 71-84
Holden, R.R., Passey, J. (2010) Socially desirable responding in personality assessment: Not necessarily faking and not necessarily substance. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5): 446-450
Jackson, D.N. (1994) Personality Research Form Manual. Port Nuron, MI: Research Psychologist Press
Knežević, G., Radović, B., Peruničić, I. (2008) Can amorality be measured. u: European Conference on Personality (XIV), July 16-20, Tartu, Estonia, book of abstracts, str. 137
Knežević, G. (2008) HEDONICA - Battery of Personality Tests. Ministry of Interior of Serbia, Technical report 2008
Knežević, G., Opačić, G. (2011) Priručnik za inventar ličnosti HEDONICA-5. Unpublished manuscript
Knežević, G., Opačić, G. (2011) Test rečnika. Unpublished software
Knežević, G.D., Momirović, K. (1996) RTT9G i RTT10G - dva programa za analizu metrijskih karakteristika kompozitnih mernih instrumenata. u: Kostić Petar [ur.] Merenje u psihologiji, Beograd: Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, br. 2, str. 37-56
Knežević, G. (2003) Koreni amoralnosti. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju
Konstabel, K., Aavik, T., Allik, J. (2006) Social desirability and consensual validity of personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 20(7): 549-566
Krueger, J. (1998) Enhancement Bias in Descriptions of Self and Others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(5): 505-516
Kurtz, J.E., Tarquini, S.J., Iobst, E.A. (2008) Socially desirable responding in personality assessment: Still more substance than style. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(1): 22-27
Lanyon, R.I. (2004) Favorable self-presentation on psychological inventories: An analysis. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 22 (1); 53-65
Law, K.S., Wong, C., Song, L.J. (2004) The Construct and Criterion Validity of Emotional Intelligence and Its Potential Utility for Management Studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3): 483-496
Lee, K., Gizzarone, M., Ashton, M.C. (2003) Personality and the likelihood to sexually harass. Sex Roles, 59-69; 49
Levashina, J., Campion, M.A. (2006) A Model of Faking Likelihood in the Employment Interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(4): 299-316
Li, A., Bagger, J. (2006) Using the BIDR to Distinguish the Effects of Impression Management and Self-Deception on the Criterion Validity of Personality Measures: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(2): 131-141
Lilienfeld, S.O., Andrews, B.P. (1996) Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal populations. J Pers Assess, 66(3): 488-524
Lönnqvist, J., Paunonen, S., Tuulio-Henriksson, A., Lönnqvist, J., Verkasalo, M. (2007) Substance and Style in Socially Desirable Responding. Journal of Personality, 75(2): 291-322
Lu, H.J., Chang, L. (2011) The association between self-deception and moral self-concept as functions of self-consciousness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(7): 845-849
MacCann, C. (2013) Instructed faking of the HEXACO reduces facet reliability and involves more Gc than Gf. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(7): 828-833
MacCann, C., Ziegler, M., Roberts, R.D. (2011) Faking in personality assessment: Reflections and recommendations. u: M. Ziegler, C. MacCann & R. D. Roberts [ur.] New Perspectives on Faking in Personality Assessment, New York: Oxford University Press, str. 309-329
MacNeil, B.M., Holden, R.R. (2006) Psychopathy and the detection of faking on self-report inventories of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(4): 641-651
McFarland, L.A., Ryan, A.M. (2000) Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5): 812-821
Međedović, J. (2012) Topography of dishonesty - mapping the opposite pole of honesty-humility personality domain. Primenjena psihologija, 5(2): 115-135
Međedović, J., Kujačić, D., Knežević, G. (2012) Ličnosne dispozicije ka kriminalnom recidivu u uzorku institucionalizovanih adolescenata. Zbornik Instituta za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, vol. 31, br. 2, str. 7-24
Merlini, P., Sudduth, M.M., Ricci-Twitchell, M., Kung, M-C., Griffith, R.L. (2010) The smart or right choice: Exploring job-related intelligence and faking. u: Poster presented at the 25th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA
Mersman, J.L., Shultz, K.S. (1998) Individual differences in the ability to fake on personality measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(2): 217-227
Mesmer-Magnus, J., Viswesvaran, C., Deshpande, S., Joseph, J. (2006) Social desirability: the role of over-claiming, self-esteem, and emotional intelligence. Psychology Science, 48 (3); 336-356
Mueller-Hanson, R., Heggestad, E.D., Thornton, G.C. (2006) Individual differences in impression management: an exploration of the psychological processes underlying faking. Psychology Science, 48 (3); 288-312
Opačić, G.Đ. (1995) Ličnost u socijalnom ogledalu. Beograd: Institut za pedagoška istraživanja / IPI
Pallier, G., Wilkinson, R., Danthiir, V., Kleitman, S., Knežević, G., Stankov, L., Roberts, R.D. (2002) The role of individual differences in the accuracy of confidence judgments. Journal of General Psychology, vol. 129, br. 3, str. 257-299
Paulhus, D.L. (1998) Manual for Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR-6). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems
Paulhus, D.L., Williams, K.M. (2002) The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6): 556-563
Pauls, C.A., Crost, N.W. (2005) Effects of different instructional sets on the construct validity of the NEO-PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2): 297-308
Raskin, R., Novacek, J., Hogan, R. (1991) Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and Defensive Self-Enhancement. Journal of Personality, 59(1): 19-38
Robie, C., Brown, D.J., Beaty, J.C. (2007) Do people fake on personality inventories? A verbal protocol analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(4): 489-509
Rothstein, M.G., Goffin, R.D. (2006) The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support?. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2): 155-180
Scandell, D.J. (2000) Development and initial validation of validity scales for the NEO-Five Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(6): 1153-1162
Scheier, M.F., Carver, C.S. (1985) The self-consciousness scale: A revised version for use with general populations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15(8): 687-699
Snell, A.F., Sydell, E.J., Lueke, S.B. (1999) Towards a Theory of Applicant Faking: Integrating Studies of Deception. Human Resource Management Review, 9(2): 219-242
Stake, J.E. (1994) Development and Validation of the Six-Factor Self-Concept Scale for Adults. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(1): 56-72
Stankov, L. (2000) Complexity, Metacognition, and Fluid Intelligence. Intelligence, 28(2): 121-143
Tonković, G.M., Jerinić, Ž. (2015) To fake or not to fake? Interaction of warning and motivational determinants in predicting faking. u: 17th Congress of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Book of Abstracts, Oslo, Norway, May 2015; 20-23; no 769952
Topping, G.D., o'Gorman J.G. (1997) Effects of faking set on validity of the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(1): 117-124
Vasilopoulos, N.L., Cucina, J.M., Dyomina, N.V., Morewitz, C.L., Reilly, R.R. (2006) Forced-Choice Personality Tests: A Measure of Personality and Cognitive Ability?. Human Performance, 19(3): 175-199
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D.S. (1999) Meta-Analyses of Fakability Estimates: Implications for Personality Measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(2): 197-210
Williams, K.M., Paulhus, D.L., Nathanson, C. (2002) The nature of over-claiming: Personality and cognitive factors. u: Poster presented at the 110th annual meeting of the American psychological association, August, 2002, Chicago, I.L
Wolf, B., Momirović, K., Džamonja, Z. (1992) Baterija testova inteligencije KOG3. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju
Ziegler, M. (2011) Applicant Faking: A look into the Black Box. Industrial and Organizational Psychologist, 29-36; 49

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: originalan članak
DOI: 10.2298/PSI1602129M
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 25.06.2016.
metod recenzije: dvostruko anoniman
Creative Commons License 4.0