Article metrics

  • citations in SCindeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[=>]
  • visits in previous 30 days:5
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:2
article: 1 from 5  
Back back to result list
Psihologija
2007, vol. 40, iss. 2, pp. 263-275
article language: Serbian
document type: unclassified
published on: 03/12/2007
doi: 10.2298/PSI0702263D
Methodological problems in Rorschach research
Clinical Center of Serbia, Clinic for Psychiatry, Belgrade

e-mail: midjocic@EUnet.yu

Abstract

Comprehensive System of Rorschach interpretation is considered as nomotetic system that makes possible using of projective method in research projects. However, research use of Rorschach method besides of appropriate knowledge of assign procedures and interpretation rules, means a knowledge of specific methodological issues. The Rorschach indicators are nor independent, as they are a part of specific net, so in some research it is necessary to control basic variables not to get artifacts in our research. This is basically relied on researches where we compare groups, as well as in normative studies where through cross-cultural we compare Rorschach indicators.

Keywords

References

Acklin, M.W. (1996) Rorschach classics in contemporary perspective: John exner and the book that started it all: a review of the Rorschach systems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(3): 650
Acklin, M.W., McDowell, C.J., Verschell, M.S., Chan, D. (2000) Interobserver agreement, intraobserver reliability, and the Rorschach Comprehensive System. J Pers Assess, 74(1): 15-47
Allen, J., Dana, R.H. (2004) Methodological issues in cross-cultural and multicultural rorschach research. J Pers Assess, 82(2): 189-208
Aronow, E., Reznikoff, M., Moreland, K.L. (1995) The Rorschach: Projective technique or psychometric test?. Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 213-28
Camara, W., Nathan, J., Puente, A. (2000) Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 31(2): 141
Costantoni, G., Flanagan, R., Malgady, R. (1995) The history of the Rorschach: Overcoming bias in multicultural projective assessment. Rorschachiana, 20, 148-170
Cronbach, L.J. (1949) Statistical methods applied to Rorschach scores: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 46(5): 393
Đurić-Jočić, D. (2005) Correlation of the Rorschach method and NEO PI-R questionnaire. Rorschachiana, 27, 11-30
Đurić-Jočić, D. (2001) Konceptualna i empirijska povezanost Rorschach metoda i NEO PI-R upitnika ličnosti. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Doktorska disertacija
Đurić-Jočić, D. (2002) Rorschach metod - Obuhvatni sistem interpretacije Johna Exnera. Podgorica: Unireks
Ellenberger, H. (1954) The life and ork of Hermann Rorschach. Bulletin of the Meninger clinic, 5, 173-213
Erdberg, P., Shaffer, T.W. (1999) Tables for the International symposium on Rorschach nonpatient data: Findings from around the world. in: XVI International Congress of Rorschach and Projective methods, Amsterdam
Exner, J.E. (1978) The Rorschach: A comprehensive system, vol. 2: Current research and advansed interpretation. New York, itd: Wiley
Exner, J.E. (1988) Problems with brief Rorschach protocols. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(4): 640
Exner, J.E. (1992) R in Rorschach Research: A Ghost Revisited. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58(2): 245
Exner, J.E. (1993) The Rorschach: A comprehensive system, vol. 1: Basic Foundations. New York, itd: Wiley
Exner, J.E. (1995) Issues and methods in Rorschach research. Hillsdale, NJ, itd: Erlbaum
Exner, J.E., Armbruster, G., Mittman, B. (1978) The Rorschach response process. J Pers Assess, 42(1): 27-38
Exner, J.E. (1994) Rorschach and the study of the individual. Rorschachiana, 19, 7-22
Exner, J.E. (2001) A Rorschach workbook for the comprehensive system. Asheville: Rorshach Workshops
Fisk, D.W., Baughman, E.E. (1953) Relationships between Rorschach scoring categories and the total number of responses. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48(1): 25
Ganellen, R.J. (2001) Weighing evidence for the Rorschach's validity: A response to Wood et al. (1999). J Pers Assess, 77(1): 1-15
Ivanouw, J. (1999) The Rorschach adult normative study in Denmark. in: XVI International congress of Rorschach and projective methods, Amsterdam
Ivanouw, J. (2000) The effect of motivation on non-patient normative Rorschach data. in: VERA Congress, Paris
Lilienfeld, S.O., Wood, J.M., Garb, H.N. (2000) The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(2): 27
Meyer, G.J. (1992) Response frequency problems in the rorschach: Clinical and research implications with suggestions for the future. Journal of personality assessment, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 231-44
Meyer, G.J. (2002) Exploring possible ethnic differences and bias in the Rorschach Comprehensive System. J Pers Assess, 78(1): 104-29
Petot, J.M., Djurić-Jočić, D. (2005) Discrepances between the Rorschach inkblot method and self-report measures of personality: Methodological and theoretical reflections. Rorschachiana, 27, 101-118
Rorschach, H. (1942) Psychodiagnostics. Berne: Hans Huber
Wood, J.M., Nezworski, M.T., Garb, H.N., Lilienfeld, S.O. (2001) The misperception of psychopathology: Problems with the norms of the comprehensive system for the Rorschach. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 8(3): 350
Wood, J.M., Nezworski, M.T., Stejskal, W.J., Garven, S., West, S.G. (1999) Methodological issues in evaluating Rorschach validity: A comment on Burns and Viglione (1996), Weiner (1996), and Ganellen (1996). Assessment, 6(2): 115-29
Zillmer, E. A., Vuz, J. (1995) Factor analysis with Rorschach data. in: J. Exner [ed.] Issues and Methods in Rorschach Research, Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers