• citations in SCIndeks: [11]
  • citations in CrossRef:[4]
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:12
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:6


article: 1 from 1  
Back back to result list
2014, vol. 62, iss. 5-6, pp. 229-250
Quest for new development model and economic policy platform for Serbia: The role of industrial policy
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Economy, Department of Business Economics and Management
Strategic and tactical measures to overcome real sector competitiveness crisis in Serbia (MESTD - 179050)

Keywords: Serbia; industrial policy; orthodox economic policy platform; heterodox economic policy platform; neo-liberal economics; structural economics; technological change; competitiveness
The devastating truth that after twenty-five years of transition Serbia's economy is still impotent and out of tune opens the question: Why do people continuously act against their own interest? The answer is: the wrong system. Serbia's economy is packed with structural imbalances. Among them, the most important one is disharmony between the real economy and financial sector due to wrong transition strategy and ineffective macro management, both blindly following neo-liberal doctrine. Deindustrialization along with financialization is the main contradiction of the system. As a consequence, Serbia has experienced output gap, competitiveness freefall, and high unemployment. By financialization we mean the increase in the influence of financial markets, institutions, and elites over both the economy and the government. Now the key challenge for Serbia is to compare neo-liberal policy platform with new conceptually complex one, which is capable of restoring the dynamic balance between the real economy and financial sector and embarking the economy on the road to sustainable employment. Doing so will take courage on the part of policy makers defining both economic policies (monetary and fiscal) and industrial policies. 'Smart' industrial policies are at the center of the rejuvenated wisdom known as the new structural economics. The economic system following the new doctrine is known as managed capitalism. It is conceptually different from free-market capitalism following neo-liberal doctrine and state capitalism following conventional structural economics. Most theories of growth and related economic policy platforms were developed at the macroeconomic level. Such perspective is good for spotting relation between stability and growth. That got us thinking: What institutional choices are supporting that relationship? Prior to the Great Recession, the answer was coming from monetary policy generally and inflation targeting policy tool specifically. But, universal efficiency of the market is not common in cases of major macroeconomic distortions like output gap, deflation, and demand-pull inflation. In such situations market forces unleashed recession, instead of booming prospects. Anti- crisis measures based on the same doctrine led to jobless recovery scenario, at best. Frequent crises confirm that some fundamental assumptions of conventional economic doctrine and related economic policy platform must be revisited. This article is a continuation of our last two contributions in the field of transition and related issues in Serbia [5] and [6]. It is an attempt to create the model of growth and policy platform in an impotent and out of tune economy from the ground up. Namely, by looking at the context primarily from microeconomic (or business) perspective and following revisited conceptual economic policy platform based on active role of government. It is reasonable because in post-crisis period the relevance of industrial policy as a common sense institutional choice and the government's lever is acknowledged by mainstream economists and politicians from all sides of ideological spectrum. There are some questions triggered by this turnaround. What is the rationale for revising market efficiency as fundamental assumption of economic orthodoxy and acknowledgement of active role of government in an economy? What are the key factors that have raised so much controversies about industrial policy per se and how to fix them up in renewed (let's say 'smart') industrial policy framework? How can 'smart' industrial policies be designed to avoid past failures as well as to emulate the past benefits? How to balance core economic policies (monetary and fiscal) with 'smart' industrial policies in the new (let's say 'heterodox') economic policy approach in the case of Serbia. What is the remaining policy agenda? This article intends to address these questions. The aim is to confirm that in defining anti-crisis measures for late developer in delayed transition industrial policy is a common sense institutional choice with deep theoretical roots and unquestionable practical results.
Blanchard, O., DellArica, G., Mauro, P. (2010) Rethinking macroeconomic policy. Washington, IMF Staff Position note br.SPN/10/03, Feb. 12, 2010
Chang, H.J. (2003) Kicking away the ladder?: Policies and institutions for economic development in historical perspective. London: Anthem Press
Chenery, H.B. (1961) Comparative advantage and development policy. American Economic Review, 51,(1), 18-51
Christensen, C., Bever, D.V. (2014) The capitalist's dilemma. Harvard Business Review, 92,(6), 60-68
Đuričin, D., Vuksanović, I. (2013) Reindustrialization strategy of Serbia: How to get it and how to use it. Ekonomika preduzeća, vol. 61, br. 5-6, str. 289-308
Đuričin, D., Vuksanović, I. (2014) How to be ahead of the curve: The role of politicians in Serbia's reindustrialization. Ekonomika preduzeća, vol. 62, br. 1-2, str. 1-20
Harrison, A., Rodríguez-Clare, A. (2010) Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries*. Handbook of Development Economics, str. 4039-4214
Hausmann, R., Klinger, B. (2006) Structural transformation and patterns of comparative advantage in the product space. in: Working Paper no. 128, Boston: Harvard University Center for international development
Hausmann, R., Rodrik, D. (2003) Economic development as self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72(2), 603-33
Hidalgo, C.A., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A.-L., Hausmann, R. (2007) The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations. Science, 317(5837): 482-487
Kindleberger, Ch. (1996) World economic primacy: 1500-1990. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc
Krueger, A.O. (1997) Trade policy and economic development: How we learn. American Economic Review, 87(1) 1-22
Krugman, P. (1979) A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income. Journal of Political Economy, 87(2): 253
Krugman, P. (2009) The return of depression economics and the crisis of 2008. New York: W.W. Norton Company Limited
Lim, W. (2011) Joint discovery and upgrading of comparative advantage: Lessons from Korea's development experience. in: Fardoust S., Kim Y., Sepulveda C.P. [ed.] Post crisis growth and development: A development agenda for the G-20, Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 173-237
Lin, J.Y. (2012) New structural economics: A framework for rethinking development and policy. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Lin, J., Chang, H. (2009) Should Industrial Policy in Developing Countries Conform to Comparative Advantage or Defy it? A Debate Between Justin Lin and Ha-Joon Chang. Development Policy Review, 27(5): 483-502
Lin, J.Y., Monga, C. (2010) Growth Identification And Facilitation : The Role Of The State In The Dynamics Of Structural Change. in: Policy Research Working Papers, Washington, DC: World Bank, 5313
Lin, J.Y., Tan, G. (1999) Policy Burdens, Accountability, and the Soft Budget Constraint. American Economic Review, 89(2): 426-431
Minsky, H.P. (2008) Stabilizing an unstable economy. McGraw-Hill
Monga, C. (2009) Post-macroeconomics: Reflections on the crisis and strategic directions ahead. in: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 4986, Washington: World Bank
Moss, D. (2007) A concise guide to macroeconomics: What managers, executives, and students need to know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
Mukunda, G. (2014) The price of Wall Street power: How the financial Sector's influence is undermining business. Harvard Business Review, 92,(6), 70-78
Noman, A., Botchwey, K., Stein, H., Stiglitz, J.E. (2011) Good Growth and Governance in AfricaRethinking Development Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Ohno, K. (2009) The middle income trap: Implications for industrialization strategies in East Asia and Africa. Tokyo: GRIPS Development Forum
Orhangazi, O. (2011) Review of financialization at work: Key texts and commentary. Journal of Economic Issues, XLV, 1, 247-249
Porter, M., Heppelmann, J. (2014) How smart connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92,(11), 64-88
Raghuram, R. (2010) Fault lines: How hidden fractures still threaten the world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Rodrick, D. (2010) The global revival of industrial policy: Picking winners, saving losers. Paris: The Economist, 05/08/2010,
Rodrik, D. (2009) Industrial Policy: Don’t Ask Why, Ask How. Middle East Development Journal, 1(1): 1-29
Romer, P.M. (1990) Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(S5): S71
Stiglitz, J., Greenwald, B. (2014) Creating a learning society: A new approach to growth, development, and social progress. New York: Columbia University Press
Stiglitz, J.E., Lin, J.Y., ur. (2013) The industrial policy revolution I: The role of government beyond ideology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
Stiglitz, J.E., Lin, J.Y., Monga, C. (2013) The Rejuvenation of Industrial Policy. in: Policy Research Working Papers, Washington: World Bank
Wade, R. (1990) Governing the market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
World Bank (1995) Bureaucrats in business: The economics and politics of government ownership. Oxford, itd: Oxford University Press / OUP


article language: English
document type: Original Paper
DOI: 10.5937/ekopre1406229D
published in SCIndeks: 06/05/2015

Related records

Ekonomika preduzeća (2018)
Digital Serbia: Economic context adjustments for double GDP
Đuričin Dragan, et al.

Ekonomika preduzeća (2015)
Think through strategy: New vision for industrialization of economy and modernization of society
Đuričin Dragan, et al.

Ekonomika preduzeća (2017)
Industrial policy for Serbia: A matrix approach
Vuksanović Iva

show all [62]