Akcije

Panoeconomicus
kako citirati ovaj članak
podeli ovaj članak

Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:2
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:1

Sadržaj

članak: 3 od 4  
Back povratak na rezultate
2012, vol. 59, br. 3, str. 311-324
Does Gibrat's law hold in the insurance industry of China? A test with sequential panel selection method
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
aDepartment of Insurance and Actuarial Science, Wuhan University, China
bDepartment of Risk Management and Insurance, Feng Chia University, Taiwan
cDepartment of Finance, Feng Chia University, Taiwan

e-adresapan.guochen@gmail.com, chenss@fcu.edu.tw, tychang@fcu.edu.tw
Ključne reči: Gibrat's law; sequential panel selection method; insurance; China
Sažetak
(ne postoji na srpskom)
This study applies the Sequential Panel Selection Method to investigate whether the growth rate of total insurance premium is independent of their size, as postulated by Robert Gibrat's (1931) Law of Proportionate Effects. Time-series data for the total insurance premium of 35 insurance companies in China during the December 2005 to May 2011 period are used. Since other panel-based unit root tests are joint tests of a unit root for all members of a panel and are incapable of determining the mix of I(0) and I(1) series in a panel setting, the SPSM, proposed by Georgios Chortareas and George Kapetanios (2009), classifies a whole panel into a group of stationary series and a group of non-stationary series. In doing so, we can clearly identify how many and which series in the panel are stationary processes. The empirical results from the SPSM tests unequivocally indicate that Gibrat's Law is only valid for one of these 35 companies studied here. Our study has important policy implications for insurance regulation, insurance market construction, and policyholder protection.
Reference
Bai, J., Ng, S. (2004) A PANIC Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration. Econometrica, 72(4): 1127-1177
Choi, B.P. (2010) The U.S. Property and Liability Insurance Industry: Firm Growth, Size, and Age. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 13(2): 207-224
Choi, I. (2002) Combination unit root tests for Cross-sectionally correlated panels. u: Peter Phillips C.B., Dean Corbae, Steven N.Durlauf, Bruce E.Hansen [ur.] The Econometric Theory and Practice: Frontiers of Analysis and Applied Research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 311-333
Chortareas, G., Kapetanios, G. (2009) Getting PPP right: Identifying mean-reverting real exchange rates in panels. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(2): 390-404
Clark, S.J., Stabler, J. (1991) Gibrat's Law and the Growth of Canadian Cities. Urban Studies, 28(4): 635-639
Dorfman, M.S. (2008) Introduction to risk management and insurance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson edu
Evans, D.S. (1987) Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 95(4): 657
Gibrat, R. (1931) Les inequalities economiques. Paris: Recueil Sirey
Hall, B.H. (1987) The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the US Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4): 583
Hardwick, P., Adams, M. (2002) Firm Size and Growth in the United Kingdom Life Insurance Industry. Journal of Risk & Insurance, 69(4): 577-593
Hart, P.E., Oulton, N. (1996) Growth and size of firms. Economic Journal, 106, 1242-1252
Heckman, J.J. (1979) Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica, 47(1): 153
Im, S.K., Hashem, P., Yongcheol, S. (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1): 53
Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y., Snell, A. (2003) Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics, 112(2): 359-379
Kumar, M.S. (1985) Growth, Acquisition Activity and Firm Size: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of Industrial Economics, 33(3): 327
Levin, A., i dr. (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1): 1-24
Maddala, G.S., Wu, S. (1999) A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(s1): 631-652
Mansfield, E. (1962) Entry, Gibrat's Law, Innovation, and the Growth of Firms. American Economic Review, 52, 5, 1023-1051
Moon, H.R., Benoit, P. (2004) Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors. Journal of Econometrics, 122(1): 81-126
Newey, W.K., West, K.D. (1994) Automatic Lag Selection in Covariance Matrix Estimation. Review of Economic Studies, 61(4): 631-653
Özerkek, Y., Çelik, S. (2010) The link between government spending, consumer confidence and consumption expenditures in emerging market countries. Panoeconomicus, vol. 57, br. 4, str. 471-485
Pesaran, H.M. (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2): 265-312
Ranjpour, R., Zahra, T.K. (2008) Evaluation of the income convergence hypothesis in ten new members of the European union: A panel unit root approach. Panoeconomicus, vol. 55, br. 2, str. 157-166
Singh, A., Whittington, G. (1975) The Size and Growth of Firms. Review of Economic Studies, 42(1): 15
Taylor, M.P., Sarno, L. (1998) The behavior of real exchange rates during the post-Bretton Woods period. Journal of International Economics, 46(2): 281-312
Tschoegl, A.E. (1983) Size, Growth, and Transnationality Among the World's Largest Banks. Journal of Business, 56(2): 187
Ucar, N., Omay, T. (2009) Testing for unit root in nonlinear heterogeneous panels. Economics Letters, 104(1): 5-8
Utton, M.A. (1971) The Effect of Mergers on Concentration: U.K. Manufacturing Industry, 1954-65. Journal of Industrial Economics, 20(1): 42
Vining, D.R. (1976) Autocorrelated Growth Rates and the Pareto Law: A Further Analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 84(2): 369
 

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
DOI: 10.2298/PAN1203311P
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 22.03.2013.