Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:2
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:2
članak: 2 od 4  
Back povratak na rezultate
Belgrade Philosophical Annual
2016, br. 29, str. 157-178
jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
doi:10.5937/BPA1629157J
Deliberation across deep divisions: Transformative moments
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
aUniversity of Cali, Colombia
bThe Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brasil
cUniversity of Bern, Switzerland
dUniversity of North Carolina, Chapell Hill, USA

Sažetak

(ne postoji na srpskom)
In group discussions of any kind there tends to be an up and down in the level of deliberation. To capture this dynamic we coined the concept of Deliberative Transformative Moments (DTM). In deeply divided societies deliberation is particularly important in order to arrive at peace and stability, but deliberation is also very difficult to be attained. Therefore, we wanted to learn about the conditions that in group discussions across the deep divisions of such societies help deliberation. We organized such group discussions between ex-guerrillas and ex-paramilitaries in Colombia, Serbs and Bosnjaks in Srebrenica, and poor residents and local police officers in the favelas (slums) of Brazil. We could identify factors that help to transform discussions from low to high deliberation and risk transformations in the opposite direction. We could also identify factors that help to keep a discussion at a high level of deliberation, and, in a next step, we could determine to what extent long sequences of deliberation had a positive impact on the outcomes of the discussions. Finally, we show how our research results can have a long term effect if it is used in schools of such deeply divided societies.

Ključne reči

Reference

Barber, B. (1984) Strong Democracy. Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press
Black, L.W. (2008) Deliberation, Storytelling, and Dialogic Moments. Communication Theory, 18(1): 93-116
Callan, E. (1997) Creating Citizens. Political Education and Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Clarendon
Dewey, J. (1902) The Child and the Curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Dickson, D., ur. (2006) John Donne's Poetry. New York: W. W. Norton
Englund, T. (2011) The Potential of Education for Creating Mutual Trust: Schools as sites for deliberation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(3): 236-248
Floridia, A. (2016) From Participation to Deliberation. A Critical Genealogy of Deliberative Democracy. Colchester: ECPR Press
Habermas, J. (1981) Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp
Institute of Political Science (2016) Deliberation. www.ipw.unibe.ch/content/research/deliberation
Johnson, P.E. (1990) We Do Too Have Morals: On Rational Choice in the Classroom. PS: Political Science and Politics, 23(4): 610
Kant, I. (1784) Was ist Aufklärung?. Berlinische Monatsschrift, Dezember: 481-494
Krause, S.R. (2008) Civil Passions. Princeton: Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Mandela, N. (1995) Long walk to freedom - the autobiography of Nelson Mandela. London: ABACUS
Muirhead, R. (2014) The Promise of Party in a Polarized Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Nansen Dialogue Network (2011-2015) Vision and mission. http://www.nansen-dialogue.net/index.php/en/who-are-we/vision-and-mission
Parkinson, J., Mansbridge, J. (2012) Deliberative Systems - Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Regione Toscana - Consiglio Regionale (1998-2016) Autorità per la partecipazione, Consiglio regionalle della Toscana. http://www.consiglio.regione.toscana.it/oi/default?idc=47andnome=PARTECIPAZIONE
Steiner, J. (2012) The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Steiner, J., Jaramillo, M.C., Maia, R.C.M., Mameli, S. (2017) Deliberation Across Deeply Divided Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Steiner, J., Jaramillo, M.C., Mameli, S. (2014) The dynamics of deliberation. Filozofski godišnjak, br. 27, str. 39-47
Steiner, J. (1991) We Need More Politicians Like Havel and We Should Tell Our Students So. PS: Political Science and Politics, 24: 46-50
Steiner, J. (1996) Conscience in Politics. An Empirical Investigation of Swiss Decision Cases. New York-London: Garland Publishing
Štajner, J. (2015) Osnovi deliberativne demokratije - empirijsko istraživanje i normativne implikacije. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
Ugarriza, J.E., Nussio, E. (2015) There is No Pill for Deliberation: Explaining Discourse Quality in Post-conflict Communities. Swiss Political Science Review, 22(1): 145-166