Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u prethodnih 30 dana:16
  • preuzimanja u prethodnih 30 dana:1
članak: 1 od 1  
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
2018, vol. 66, br. 2, str. 7-46
jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: članak
doi:10.5937/AlaniPFB1802007V

Creative Commons License 4.0
Arbitražni ugovor i interkompanijskopravni sporovi
Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu + Stalna arbitraža pri Privrednoj komori Srbije

e-adresa: vaske@ius.bg.ac.rs

Sažetak

Afirmacija arbitražnog rešavanja privrednih sporova u oblasti ugovornog prava, i na nacionalnim nivoima (kao nesumnjiv trend, iako različitog stepena) i na međunarodnom nivou, otvorila je pitanje mogućnosti takvog načina rešavanja i interkompanijskopravnih sporova, kako bi se sloboda volje investitora proširila iz domena osnivanja trgovačkih društava i u domen slobode izbora foruma rešavanja mogućih sporova iz brojnih pravnih odnosa te prirode. Ipak, za razliku od ugovora u kojima sloboda volje ima primat u odnosu na njena ograničenja (odnos pravila i izuzetka), sfera interkompanijskopravnih odnosa, iako u osnovi ugovorna po nastanku, u svom funkcionisanju ima naglašenu potrebu da reši sukob ugovornog i kompanijskog prava, kako bi arbitrabilnost tih sporova bila realno moguća, a, s druge strane, sfera kompanijskog prava uvek je više od ugovornog prava u fokusu pažnje nacionalnih javnih poredaka, kao univerzalne ustanove (nezavisno od svog obuhvata) koja predstavlja branu arbitrabilnosti tih sporova. U ovom članku autor najpre analizira pravnu prirodu konstitutivnih akata privrednih društava (osnivačkog akta i statuta akcionarskog društva) u kontekstu arbitražnog ugovora, na kome se jedino može zasnovati arbitrabilnost interkompanijskopravnih sporova, i zaključuje da njihova ugovorna priroda predstavlja ozbiljnu smetnju za mandatorne arbitraže tih sporova (ako bi ovi akti s ovom klauzulom bili usvojeni većinom glasova), s tim što bi teorija ugovora po pristupu mogla da bude izlaz za podsticaj arbitrabilnosti, ali samo u zatvorenim formama društava, dok u javnom akcionarskom društvu to ne bi bilo moguće, posebno u slučaju neprofesionalnih akcionara, zbog potrebe njihove dodatne zaštite ustanovama potrošačkog prava. Autor, zatim, analizira i sam pojam interkompanijskopravnih sporova i sisteme moguće objektivne arbitrabilnosti (ratione materiae) tih sporova, konstatujući da srpsko arbitražno pravo i kompanijsko pravo, posebno u mogućoj restriktivnoj koncepciji 'isključive nadležnosti privrednih sudova' za te sporove, u najmanju ruku ima ozbiljne razloge za promene u prilog snaženja njihove arbitrabilnosti, uz određena potrebna pojedinačna isključenja, gde dominira interes javnog poretka. Najzad, autor analizira i neke aspekte multistranačke prirode interkompanijskopravnih sporova, posebno u vezi sa javnim akcionarskim društvima, kao moguće proceduralne smetnje za njihovo arbitražno rešavanje, čak i u uslovima njihove eventualne nesporne objektivne arbitrabilnosti.

Ključne reči

Arbitražni ugovor; Ugovor o osnivanju privrednog društva; Statut akcionarskog društva; Arbitrabilnost; Interkompanijskopravni arbitražni sporovi; Multistranačke arbitraže; 'Prinudne' arbitraže

Reference

*** (2007) National report for Italy: Arbitration in company matters. u: Paulsson J., Bosman L. [ur.] ICCA International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, Supplement No. 48
Abraham, K.S., Montgomery, J.W. (2012) The lawlessness of arbitration. http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=353340, 25.mart 2018
Alderman, R.M. (2003) Consumer arbitration: The destruction of the common law. The Journal of American Arbitration, 2(1)
Allen, C.H. (2014) Bylaws mandating arbitration of stockholders disputes?. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 39(3)
Anglani, A., Liguori, F. (2007) Italy's New arbitration Laws. European Arbitration Review
Antić, O. (2007) Obligaciono pravo. Beograd
Armour, J., Black, B., Cheffins, B., Nolan, R. (2009) Private Enforcement of Corporate Law: An Empirical Comparison of the United Kingdom and the United States. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6(4): 687-722
Babović, B. (2017) O uvođenju grupne tužbe anglosaksonskog tipa u prava država članica EU. Pravo i privreda, vol. 55, br. 4-6, str. 521-532
Ben-Shahar, O. (2016) The paradox of access justice and its application to mandatory arbitration. The University of Chicago Law Review, 83(4)
Berger, M. (2004) Arbitration and arbitrability: Toward an expectation model. Baylor Law Review, 56(3)
Born, G.B. (2009) International commercial arbitration. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, Volume 1
Borris, Ch. (2016) Collective arbitration: The European experience - Germany and the DIS supplementary rules of corporate law disputes. u: Hanotiau B., Schwartz E.A. [ur.] Class and civil group actions in arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International
Brabant, T.A., Desplats, M., Salem, S. (2015) Arbitration and company law in France. European Company Law, 12(3)
Braga, P.C. (2007) Non-Signatories to the Arbitration Agreement: Recent Developments in Brazil
Brekoulakis, S.L. (2009) On Arbitrability: Persisting misconceptions and new areas of concern. u: Mistelis L.A., Brekoulakis S.L. [ur.] Arbitrability - International and Comparative Perspectives, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International
Carter, J., Payton, S. (2015) Arbitration and company law in England and Wales. European Company Law, 12(3)
Cate, T.I.M. (2004) Multy-Party and Multy-Contract Arbitrations: Procedural Mechanisms and Interpretation of Arbitration Agreements under US Law. American Review of International Arbitration, 15
Choi, A.H., Min, G. (2017) Amending corporate charters and bylaws. http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1898/, 25.mart 2018
Coffee, J.C. (2012) The Death of Stockholder Litigation?. National Law Journal, February; 13
Cohen, D. (1993) Arbitrage et société. Paris: LGDJ
Cozian, M., Viandier, A. (2006) Droit des sociétés. Paris: LITEC
Cukavac, M. (2001) Sadržina arbitražnog ugovora. Arbitraža
Cukavac, M. (2003) Arbitraža i treća lica. Arbitraža
Daujotas, R. (2012) Non-Signatories and Abuse of Corporate Structure in International Commercial Arbitration
Dent, G.W. (1980) The power of directors to terminate stockholder litigation: The death of the derivative suit?. Northwestern University Law Review, 75(1)
Deskoski, T. (2016) International Arbitration Law. Skopje
Di, P.D. (2009) General remarks on arbitrability under the New York convention. u: Mistelis L.A., Brekoulakis S.L. [ur.] Arbitrability - International and Comparative Perspective, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International
Dika, M. (1999) Arbitrabilnost i isključiva nadležnost sudova. Pravo u gospodarstvu, 38(1)
Đorđević, M., Jovanović, M. (2017) Access to Arbitration by Economically Weaker Parties. Croatian Arbitration Yearbook, br. 24
Easterbrook, F., Fischel, D. (2012) The Corporate Contract, Foundations of Corporate Law. New York
Esin, I., i dr. (2015) Arbitrating M&A disputes. u: Esin I., Yesilimark A. [ur.] Arbitration in Turkey, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International
Fouchard, P., Gaillard, E., Goldman, B. (1996) Traité de l'arbitrage commercial international. Paris
Galič, A. (2017) Establishing an Out-of-Court Mechanism for the Resolution of Consumer Disputes. Croatian Arbitration Yearbook, br. 24
Goldštajn, A., Triva, S. (1987) Međunarodna trgovačka arbitraža. Zagreb: Informator
Gowling, W.L.G. (2016) Coming to Canada: Corporate Disputes and Litigation-Related Bylaws. https://gowlingwlg.com/en/insights-resources/articles/2016/corporate-disputes-and-litigation-bylaws-canada, 25. mart 2018
Gross, J. (2016) The historical basis of securities arbitration as an investor protection mechanism. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 1
Gross, J.I. (2010) The End of Mandatory Securities Arbitration?. Pace Law Review, 4
Guyon, Y. (2003) Droit des affaires. Paris: Economica, str. 292
Hamel, J., Lagarde, G., Jauffret, A. (1980) Droit commercial. Paris, 2e volume, No 686, str. 457
Jakšić, A. (2003) Međunarodna trgovinska arbitraža. Beograd
Klein, P. (2017) The arbitration agreement: Arbitrability of company law disputes. u: Zeiler G., i dr. [ur.] Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration, Wien
Knežević, G. (1999) Međunarodna trgovinska arbitraža. Beograd
Knežević, G., Pavić, V. (2009) Arbitraža i ADR. Beograd
Kondo, M., i dr. (2004) Arbitration Law of Japan. Tokyo
Kraayvanger, J., Hilgard, M.C. (2009) Arbitrability of shareholders' disputes under German law. International Litigation Quarterly, 26(1)
le Cannu, P., Dondero, B. (2012) Droit des sociétés. Paris
Lee, J. (2015) Intra-Corporate Dispute Arbitration and Minority Shareholder Protection: A Corporate Governance Perspective
Lipton, A.M. (2016) Manufactured consent: The problem of arbitration clauses in corporate charters and bylaws. The Georgetown Law Journal, 104(3)
Markert, L. (2015) Arbitrating corporate disputes: German approaches and international solutions to reconcile conflicting principles. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 8(1)
McLaughlin, J.T. (1996) Arbitrability: Current Trends in the United States. Arbitration International, 12(2): 113-136
Merle, P. (2018) Droit commercial - Sociétés commerciales. Paris: Dalloz
Mistelis, L.A. (2009) Arbitrability: International and comparative perspective. u: Mistelis L.A., Brekoulakisv S.L. [ur.] Arbitrability - International and Comparative Perspective, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International
Morrisey, D.J. (2012) Will arbitration end securities litigation. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2048707, 25.mart 2018
Oberhammer, E., Weber, S. (2010) The arbitration agreement and the arbitrability: The arbitration of corporate disputes in limited liability companies. u: Klausegger Ch., i dr. [ur.] Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration, Wien
Ozel, O.E. (2016) The group of companies doctrine as a non-signatory issue in arbitration agreements. http://ozel.law/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ozel_articles-002.pdf, 25.mart 2018
Palačković, D. (2003) Množina procesnopravnih odnosa u arbitražnom postupku. Arbitraža
Pamboukis, Ch. (2009) On arbitrability: The arbitrator as a problem solver. u: Mistelis L.A., Brekoulakis S.L. [ur.] Arbitrability - International and Comparative Perspective, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International
Paulsson, J., i dr. (1996) Arbitrability Special Issue. Arbitration International, 12(2): iii-x
Paulsson, J. (1995) Arbitration Without Privity. ICSID Review, 10(2): 232-257
Perović, J. (1998) Ugovor o međunarodnoj trgovinskoj arbitraži. Beograd
Perović, S. (1980) Obligaciono pravo. Beograd
Pitkowitz, N. (2014) The arbitration agreement and arbitrability. u: Klausegger Ch., i dr. [ur.] The Arbitrability of Corporate Disputes under Austrian Law - Still Open Questions?: Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration, Wien
Radović, M. (2014) Pojam ugovora u ime budućeg društva. Pravo i privreda, vol. 52, br. 4-6, str. 148-175
Raeschke-Kessler, H.R. (1996) Arbitrability of disputes concerning resolutions of a Limited Liability Company (GmBH). Association Suisse de l' arbitrage Bulletin, 14(3)
Redffern, A., Hunter, M. (1992) International Commercial Arbitration. London
Schwartz, D.S. (2008) If you love arbitration - set it free: How ‘mandatory' undermines arbitration. Nevada Law Journal, 8(1)
Shell, G.R. (1989) Arbitration and corporate governance. North Carolina Law Review, 67(3)
Shmatenko, L. (2012) Piercing the corporate veil is relative. Young Arbitration Review, 4(1)
Shore, L. (2009) The United States’ perspective on ‘arbitrability’. u: Mistelis L.A., Brekoulakis S.L. [ur.] Arbitrability: International and Comparative Perspective, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International
Stanivuković, M. (2013) Međunarodna arbitraža. Beograd
Stipanowitch, Th.J. (1987) Arbitration and multi-party dispute: The search for workable solutions. Iowa Law Review, 72(3)
Strong, S.I. (2008) Enforcing class arbitration in the international sphere: Due process and public policy concerns. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 30(1)
Strong, S.I. (2013) Class, mass and collective arbitration in national and international law. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/class-mass-and-collective-arbitration-in-national-and-international-law-9780199772520?cc=rs&lang=en&, 25. mart 2018
Tomić-Petrović, N. (2014) Rešavanje potrošačkih sporova pred arbitražom. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 62, br. 2, str. 86-114
Trajković, M. (2000) Međunarodno arbitražno pravo. Beograd
Uzelac, A. (2002) Nove granice arbitrabilnosti u hrvatskom pravu. Pravo u gospodarstvu, 41(2)
Varadi, T. (2014-2015) What is pro-arbitration today. Croatian Arbitration Yearbook, 21-22
Varady, T., i dr. (1999) International Commercial Arbitration - A Transnational Perspective. St. Paul: Minn
Vasiljević, M. (2017) Kompanijsko pravo. Beograd
Vasiljević, M. (2017) Arbitrability ratione materiae in company law. Pravni život, br. 11
Viscasillas, P.P.D.M. (2017) Some specific issues about arbitrability in Spain: Back to the past?. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 65, br. 4, str. 28-52
Ware, S.J. (2006) The case of enforcing adhesive arbitration agreements: With particular consideration of class actions and arbitration fees. The Journal of American Arbitration, 5(2)
Ware, S.J. (2008) What Makes Securities Arbitration Different from Other Consumer and Employment Arbitration?. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 76
Ware, S.J. (1999) Default Rules from Mandatory Rules: Privatizing Law Through Arbitration. Minnesota Law Review, 83(3)
Winship, V. (2016) Shareholder litigation by contract. Boston University Law Review, 96(2)
Woolhouse, S.P. (2004) Group of Companies Doctrine and English Arbitration Law. Arbitration International, 20(4): 435-444
Youssef, K.A. (2009) The death of inarbitrability. u: Mistelis L.A., Brekoulakis S.L. [ur.] Arbitrability - International and Comparative Perspective, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International