Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u prethodnih 30 dana:8
  • preuzimanja u prethodnih 30 dana:5
članak: 1 od 1  
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
2018, vol. 66, br. 4, str. 38-55
jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: članak
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1804038P

Creative Commons License 4.0
Legal certainty and taxation: The problem of retroactive interpretation
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet

e-adresa: dejan.popovic@ius.bg.ac.rs, skostic@ius.bg.ac.rs

Sažetak

(ne postoji na srpskom)
This article shows that the principle of legality of a tax norm is not exhausted in its 'source' component (i.e. that the norm is enacted by parliament) but also encompasses the 'content' element - a set of requirements for it to be deemed as good law. It is not just retroactivity of a law that is an issue, but legal certainty is also jeopardized by retroactive interpretation implying changes in interpretation of the same norm by authorities who understood it for a long period in a different sense. A threat to legal certainty also exists when a provision that was dormant for years is suddenly applied. A case study shows that the Serbian Parliament issued an authentic interpretation of a tax norm to assert essentially a different interpretation compared to the one well-established in the past, in order to solve a particular case, while a court used that interpretation to pass judgment in a pending case. Within the EU we find notable cases where not only are norms attributed a certain meaning from their inception, even though 60 years may have passed from their initial introduction to the possibility of the existence of a 'new meaning' being suggested for the first time, but taxpayers are made to suffer the consequences of the new interpretation. Had the legislator been able to pay more attention to the content of the bills and apply a more comprehensive approach to current issues, the legal certainty, in terms of avoiding 'innovative' retroactive interpretations, could be preserved.

Ključne reči

Good law; Retroactivity; Authentic interpretation; Urgent procedure; Retroactive interpretation

Reference

*** (2007) Priručnik za primenu Zakona o porezu na dobit preduzeća [Manual for the application of the corporate income tax law]. Belgrade: Ministry of Finance, Tax Administration
Agh, A. (1997) Parliaments as Policy-making Bodies in East Central Europe: The Case of Hungary. International Political Science Review, 18(4): 417-432
Antić, T. (2015) Vjerodostojno tumačenje zakona. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 1
de Crouy-Chanel, E., de la Motte, M.A. (2010) France. u: Dourado A.P. [ur.] Separation of Powers in Tax Law, Amsterdam: IBFD, EATLP International Tax Series
del Federico, L., Castigione, R., Miconi, F. (2010) Italy. u: Dourado A.P. [ur.] Separation of Powers in Tax Law, Amsterdam: IBFD, EATLP International Tax Series
Dourado, A. P. (2010) General report: In search of validity in tax law: The boundaries between creation and application in a rule-of-law state. u: Dourado A.P. [ur.] Separation of Powers in Tax Law, Amsterdam: IBFD, EATLP International Tax Series
Fuller, L.L. (2001) Moralnost Prava [The Morality of Law]. Belgrade: University of Belgrade Faculty of Law
Goetz, K.H., Zubek, R. (2007) Government, Parliament and Law-making in Poland. Journal of Legislative Studies, 13(4): 517-538
Gribnau, H. (2010) Netherlands. u: Dourado A.P. [ur.] Separation of Powers in Tax Law, Amsterdam: IBFD, EATLP International Tax Series
Gribnau, H. (2013) Equality, Legal Certainty and Tax Legislation in the Netherlands
Fundamental Legal Principles as Checks on Legislative Power: A Case Study. Utrecht Law Review, 9(2): 52
Heinrich, J., Prinz, I. (2010) 'Austria', Separation of Powers in Tax Law. Amsterdam: EATLP International Tax Series, IBFD, (ed. A. P. Dourado)
Kopecký, P. (2004) Power to the executive! the changing executive-legislative relations in eastern Europe. Journal of Legislative Studies, 10(2-3): 142-153
Lunder, E.K., Meltz, R., Thomas, K.R. (2012) Constitutionality of retroactive tax legislation. Congressional Research Service, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42791.pdf, 9 November 2017
Mason, R. (2017) Special Report on State Aid - Part 3: Apple. Tax Notes, February; 6
Mccormack, S.W. (2013) Tax Abuse According to Whom?. Florida Tax Review, 1
Nielsen, J.G. (2010) 'Denmark', Separation of Powers in Tax Law. Amsterdam: EATLP International Tax Series, IBFD, (ed. A. P. Dourado)
Peters, B., van de Velde, E. (2010) Belgium. u: Dourado A.P. [ur.] Separation of Powers in Tax Law, Amsterdam: IBFD, EATLP International Tax Series
Pettai, V., Madise, Ü. (2006) The Baltic parliaments: Legislative performance from independence to EU accession. Journal of Legislative Studies, 12(3-4): 291-310
Tipke, K. (2013) Die Steuerrechtsordnung, Band 3. Köln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt
U.S. Department of the Treasury (2016) White paper: European Commission's recent state aid investigations of transfer pricing rulings. Washington, DC, 24 August, https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/treaties/Documents/White-Paper-State-Aid.pdf
Vanistendael, F. (1996) Legal framework for taxation. u: Thuronyi V. [ur.] Tax Design and Drafting, Washington, DC: IMF, Vol. I
Verhagen, H.L.E. (2017) State Aid and Tax Rulings - An Assessment of the Selectivity Criterion of Article 107(1) of the TFEU in Relation to Recent Commission Transfer Pricing Decisions. European Taxation, 7
Vuković, D. (2016) Hollowing Out of Institutions: Law-making and Policymaking in Contemporary Serbia. u: 8th Central and Eastern European Forum for Young Legal, Political and Social Theorists: Central and Eastern European Socio-Political and Legal Transition, Budapest, 8