Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u prethodnih 30 dana:11
  • preuzimanja u prethodnih 30 dana:9
članak: 1 od 1  
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
2018, vol. 66, br. 4, str. 84-102
jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: članak

Creative Commons License 4.0
Do TFEU provisions on free movement of goods apply to private parties: Expanded vertical or horizontal direct effect?
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
University of Montenegro, Faculty of Law, Montenegro



(ne postoji na srpskom)
The paper aims to establish whether and to what extent the TFEU provisions on free movement of goods apply to legal relations established between two or more private parties. To that end, a stringent analysis of the case law related to this particular issue is provided, aimed at supporting the initial hypotheses that, notwithstanding sporadic but only implicit inclination in its judgments towards establishing the direct horizontal effect of the free movement of goods, the CJEU has constantly and resolutely abstained from recognizing the existence of such an effect - the same effect that it acknowledged decades ago, regarding the free movement of workers and freedom to provide services. Before this analysis, overview is provided of the status quo regarding the horizontal direct effect of the free movement of workers and services, which was needed not only for understanding the differences in the CJEU's approach to various fundamental freedoms but also to outline the general framework in which the horizontal direct effect of fundamental freedoms currently exists, too. Finally, based on the case law analysis, the conclusion is offered that in terms of the recent developments in the field of free movement of goods the CJEU has opted for further expansion of the concept of vertical direct effect in order to both avoid establishing the horizontal direct effect of the freedom of movement of goods and safeguard the functioning of internal market against certain impediments generated by private parties.

Ključne reči


Arnull, A. (1996) The European Court and Judicial Objectivity: A Reply to Professor Hartley. Law Quarterly Review, 112
Barnard, C. (2016) The substantive law of the EU: The four freedoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Barnard, C. (2008) Viking and Laval: An Introduction. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 10: 463-492
Blauberger, M., Schmidt, S.K. (2017) The European Court of Justice and its political impact. West European Politics, 40(4): 907-918
Chalmers, D., Davies, G., Monti, G. (2010) European Union Law cases and materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Cuyvers, A. (2017) Freedom of Establishment and the Freedom to Provide Services in the eu. u: Ugirashebuja, Emmanuel; Ruhangisa, John Eudes; Ottervanger, Tom; Cuyvers, Armin [ur.] East African Community Law, Brill, str. 376-391
Dawson, M., de Witte, B., Muir, E., Muir, E., Dawson, M., de Witte, B. (2013) Introduction: the European Court of Justice as a political actor. u: Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice, Edward Elgar Publishing, str. 1-10
de Freitas, L.V. (2015) The Judicial Activism of the European Court of Justice. Cham: Springer Nature, str. 173-180
de Mol, M. (2010) Kücükdeveci: Mangold Revisited - Horizontal Direct Effect of a General Principle of EU Law: Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) Judgment of 19 January 2010, Case C-555/07, Seda Kücükdeveci v. Swedex GmbH & Co. KG. European Constitutional Law Review, 6(02): 293-308
de Waele, H. (2010) The role of the European court of justice in the integration process: A contemporary and normative assessment. Hanse Law Review, 6(1)
Gormley, L.W. (2015) Private parties and the free movement of goods: Responsible, irresponsible, or a lack of principles?. Fordham International Law Journal, 38(4)
Hartkamp, A. (2010) The effect of the EC treaty in private law: On direct and indirect horizontal effects of primary community law. European Review of Private Law, 18(3)
Hartley, T.C. (1996) The European Court, Judicial Objectivity and the Constitution of the European Union. Law Quarterly Review, 112
Krenn, C. (2012) A missing piece in the horizontal effect ‘jigsaw': Horizontal direct effect and the free movement of goods. Common Market Law Review, 49(1)
Lohse, J.E. (2007) Fundamental freedoms and private actors: Towards an ‘indirect horizontal effect'. European Public Law, 13(1)
Mayr, S. (2012) Putting a leash on the court of justice?: Preconceptions in national methodology v effet utile as a meta-rule. European Journal of Legal Studies, 5(2)
Rasmussen, M. (2014) Revolutionizing European law: A history of the Van Gend en Loos judgment. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(1): 136-163
Rasmussen, M. (2017) How to enforce European law? A new history of the battle over the direct effect of Directives, 1958-1987. European Law Journal, 23(3-4): 290-308
Robin-Olivier, S. (2014) The evolution of direct effect in the EU: Stocktaking, problems, projections. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(1): 165-188
Sadl, U. (2015) The Role of Effet Utile In Preserving the Continuity and Authority of European Union Law: Evidence from the citation web of the pre-accession case law of the court of justice of the EU. European Journal of Legal Studies, 8(1)
Savkovic, V. (2016) The Alleged Case of Golden Shares in Montenegro: A Candidate Country’s Experience as an Incentive for Including Acta Jure Gestionis within the Range of Restrictions on Free Movement of Capital. Review of Central and East European Law, 41(2): 117-156
Schepel, H. (2013) Freedom of contract in free movement law: Balancing rights and principles in European public and private law. European Review of Private Law, 21(5/6)
Schepel, H. (2012) Constitutionalising the Market, Marketising the Constitution, and to Tell the Difference: On the Horizontal Application of the Free Movement Provisions in EU Law. European Law Journal, 18(2): 177-200
Shapiro, M. (1999) The European Court of Justice. u: Craig P., De Búrca G. [ur.] The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Storey, T., Turner, C. (2014) Unlocking Company Law. Abingdon, New York: Routledge, Oxon
Stuyck, J. (2015) The European Court of Justice as a motor of private law. u: Twigg-Flesner, Christian; Twigg-Flesner, Christian [ur.] The Cambridge Companion to European Union Private Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (CUP), str. 101-115
Tridimas, T. (1996) The Court of Justice and Judicial Activism. European Law Review, 21
Usher, J.A. (2007) The evolution of the free movement of capital. Fordham International Law Journal, 31(5)
van de Kooij, A.C. (2013) The private effect of the free movement of goods: Examining private-law bodies' activities under the scope of article 34 of the treaty of the functioning of the European Union. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 40(4)
van Harten, H., Nauta, T. (2013) Towards horizontal direct effect for the free movement of goods?: Comment on Fra. Bo. European Law Review, 38(5)
van Leuken, R. (2017) Private Law and the Internal Market. Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Vuletić, D. (2014) Direct horizontal effect of the free movement of goods and reshaping of the European economic constitution: Back to the future?. Inter EU Law East, 1(2)
Weiler, J.H.H. (1987) The Court of Justice On Trial. Common Market Law Review, 24
Weiss, F., Kaupa, C. (2014) European Union Internal Market Law. Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Wiberg, M. (2014) The EU Services Directive: Law or Simply Policy?. The Hague: Springer Nature
Wyatt, D. (2008) Horizontal Effect of Fundamental Freedoms and the Right to Equality after Viking and Mangold, and the Implications for Community Competence. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 4(4):