Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u prethodnih 30 dana:6
  • preuzimanja u prethodnih 30 dana:5
članak: 1 od 1  
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
2018, vol. 66, br. 4, str. 143-155
jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: članak

Creative Commons License 4.0
Justified epistemic authority (in legal interpretation)
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet



(ne postoji na srpskom)
The paper analyzes one of the main influences on the results of legal interpretation - epistemic authority. An account of authority is given along with a distinction between two basic types of authority, followed by a brief explanation of practical authority. Epistemic authority and derivative epistemic authority in particular are explained, in order to propose the conditions under which the influence of epistemic authority on judicial interpretation is justified. The general conclusion of the paper is the following: A court or judge Y is rationally justified to defer to the ascription of meaning (interpretation) p to a legal text q of person X, if court or judge Y has good reasons to believe that X has more knowledge, skills, experience or training in ascribing meaning to (interpreting) q.

Ključne reči

Authority; Legal interpretation; Epistemic authority; Practical Authority


Alston, W.P. (1994) Belief-forming practices and the social. u: Schmitt F. [ur.] Socializing Epistemology, Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
Darwall, S. (2010) Authority and Reasons: Exclusionary and Second‐Personal. Ethics, 120(2): 257-278
de George, R.T. (1970) The function and limits of epistemic authority. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 8(2-3): 199-204
Foley, R. (1994) Egoism in epistemology. u: Schmitt F. [ur.] Socializing Epistemology, Lanham, Maryland: Littlefield Publishers
Foley, R. (2001) Intellectual Trust in Oneself and Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fricker, E. (2007) Second-Hand Knowledge*. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73(3): 592-618
Fricker, E. (2006) Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy. u: Lackey, Jennifer; Sosa, Ernest [ur.] The Epistemology of Testimony, Oxford University Press (OUP), str. 225-245
Gadamer, H-G. (2006) Truth and Method. London-New York: Continuum, (translated by J. Weinsheimer, D. G Marshall)
Glenu, H.P. (1987) Persuasive authority. McGill Law Journal, 32(2)
Green, L. (1988) The authority of the state. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Hardwig, J. (1985) Epistemic Dependence. Journal of Philosophy, 82(7): 335
Himma, K.E. (2018) Practical Authority. u: Bongiovanni, Giorgio; Postema, Gerald; Rotolo, Antonino; Sartor, Giovanni; Valentini, Chiara; Walton, Douglas [ur.] Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation, Dordrecht: Springer Nature, str. 191-217
Hurd, H. (2009) Moral Combat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Jäger, C. (2016) Epistemic authority, preemptive reasons, and understanding. Episteme, 13(02): 167-185
Lackey, J. (2006) The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Lehrer, K. (1977) Social Information. Monist, 60(4): 473-487
Marmor, A. (2009) Social Conventions. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
Nozick, R. (1981) Philosophical explanations. Belknap Press
Raz, J. (1995) Ethics in the Public Domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Raz, J. (1979) The authority of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Raz, J. (1988) The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Raz, J. (1999) Practical Reason and Norms. Oxford University Press (OUP)
Raz, J. (2009) Between Authority and Interpretation. Oxford University Press (OUP)
Schauer, F. (2008) Authority and Authorities. Virginia Law Review, 94
Sunstein, C.R., Vermeule, A. (2002) Interpretation and Institutions
Zagzebski, L.T. (2012) Epistemic Authority. Oxford University Press (OUP)