Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:6
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:4
članak: 1 od 1  
Strani pravni život
2019, br. 4, str. 19-39
jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
doi:10.5937/spz63-24844
Ka boljem razumevanju standarda adekvatne zastupljenosti pripadnika nacionalnih manjina u javnom sektoru
Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd

e-adresa: milicavmatijevic@gmail.com

Sažetak

Članom 15 Okvirne konvencije nalaže se državama članicama da stvore uslove potrebne za delotvorno učešće pripadnika nacionalnih manjina u radu državne uprave i drugim segmentima javnog sektora. Kao što je to slučaj i sa ostalim elementima čl. 15, stepen ispunjenosti ove obaveze ocenjuje se spram standarda adekvatne zastupljenosti. Obaveza obezbeđenja uslova za adekvatnu zastupljenost pripadnika nacionalnih manjina i/ili osoba koje govore manjinske jezike u javnom sektoru predstavlja novinu u načinu organizacije javne uprave jer su sve do donošenja Okvirne konvencije one po pravilu bile jednojezične. To, kao i okolnost da su odredbe čl. 15 programatskog karaktera, dovodi do izražene neodređenosti standarda adekvatne zastupljenosti. U radu autorka pristupa ovom problemu kroz nastojanje da identifikuje pravne ciljeve koje treba ostvariti primenom standarda adekvatne zastupljenosti pripadnika nacionalnih manjina u javnom sektoru, te sa tim naumom analizira tematske komentare i pojedinačna mišljenja Savetodavnog komiteta za Okvirnu konvenciju. Svrha rada je da se kroz potpunije razumevanje pravnih ciljeva koji leže u temelju standarda adekvatne zastupljenosti doprinese njegovom daljem normativnom elaboriranju. Ovo je neophodno kako bi standard postao određeniji i jasniji, te time i korisniji kako državama članicama Okvirne konvencije u njihovim nastojanjima da ispune obavezu stvaranja uslova za delotvorno učešće pripadnika nacionalnih manjina u radu javnog sektora, tako i samom Savetodavnom komitetu prilikom procene stepena ispunjenosti čl. 15.

Ključne reči

čl. 15; standard adekvatne zastupljenosti; tela javne uprave; Savetodavni komitet; nacionalne manjine

Reference

*** (1992) Explanatory report to the European charter for regional or minority languages, European treaty series no. 148. European Treaty Series, 5 October; Strasbourg
*** (1995) Explanatory report to the Framework Convention for the protection of national minorities, European treaty series no. 157. 1 February
*** (1995) Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. CoE ETS No. 157; (1 February)
*** (1997) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 999, (23 March), p. 171
*** (2000) Thlimmenos v Greece, judgment (preliminary objection, merits and just satisfaction). u: App. No. 34369/97, App. No. 34369/97, ECHR 2000-IV, (2001) 31 EHRR 411, IHRL 2928 (ECHR 2000)
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2015) Fourth Opinion on Croatia. ACFC/OP/IV(2015)005rev (adopted on 18 November)
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2013) Third Opinion on Serbia. ACFC/OP/III(2013)006 (28 November )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2008) Commentary no. 2: The effective participation of persons belonging to national minorities in cultural, social and economic life and in public affairs. ACFC/31DOC(2008)001 (adopted on 27 February )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2001) Opinion on Cyprus. ACFC/INF/OP/I(2002)4 (adopted on 6 April )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2001) Opinion on Croatia. ACFC/INF/OP/I(2002)003 (adopted on 6 April )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2002) Opinion on Germany. ACFC/INF/OP/I(2002)008 (1 March 2002)
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2010) Opinion on the Netherlands. ACFC/OP/I(2009)002 (adopted on 17 February )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2008) Second Opinion on Albania. ACFC/OP/II(2008)003 (adopted on 29 May )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities Second Opinion on Bosnian and Herzegovina. ACFC/OP/II(2008)005 (adopted on 9 October )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2005) Second Opinion on Italy. ACFC/INF/OP/II(2005)003 (adopted on 24 February )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2009) Second Opinion on Kosovo. ACFC/OP/II(2009)004 (adopted on 5 November )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2009) Second Opinion on Serbia. ACFC/OP/II(2009)001 (adopted on 19 March )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2011) Third Opinion on Estonia. ACFC/OP/III(2011)004 (adopted on 1 April )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2010) Third Opinion on Italy. ACFC/OP/III(2010)008 (adopted on 15 October )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2013) Third Opinion on Kosovo. ACFC/OP/III(2013)002 (adopted on 6 March )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2019) Third Opinion on Montenegro. ACFC/OP/III(2019)001rev (adopted on 7 March )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2016) Fourth Opinion on Finland. ACFC/OP/IV(2016)002 (adopted on 24 February )
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2017) Fourth Opinion on Kosovo. ACFC/OP/IV(2017)001 (adopted on 8 March 2017)
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minoritiess (2016) Fourth Opinion on Moldova. ACFC/OP/IV(2016)004 (adopted on 25 May 2016)
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2016) Fourth Opinion on North Macedonia. ACFC/OP/IV(2016)001 (adopted on 24 February 2016)
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2016) Fourth Opinion on Norway. ACFC/OP/IV(2016)008 (adopted on 13 October 2016)
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2014) Fourth Opinion on the Slovak Republic. ACFC/OP/IV(2014)004 (adopted on 3 December 2014)
Advisory committee on the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (2019) Fourth Opinion on Serbia. ACFC/OP/IV(2019)001 (adopted on 26 June 2019)
Basta-Fleiner, L.R. (2013) Participation rights under the framework convention for the protection of national minorities (FCNM): Towards a legal framework against social and economic discrimination. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, br. 65, str. 19-36
Baude, W., Sachs, E.S. (2017) The law of interpretation. Harvard Law Review, 130: 1079-1147
Boran, I. (2003) Global linguistic diversity, public goods, and the principle of fairness. u: Kymlicka W.; Patten A. [ur.] Language Rights and Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 189-209
Brink, O.D. (1998) Legal theory, legal interpretation, and judicial review. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 17(2): 105-148
de Vos, M. (2007) Beyond formal equality: Positive action under directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC. Luxembourg: European Commission, str. 34
Dworkin, R. (1977) Taking rights seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Economides, C. (2010) Content of the obligation: Obligations of means and obligations of result. u: Crawford J.; Pellet A.; Olleson S. [ur.] The Law of International Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 371-382
Fraser, N. (1997) Justice Interruptus: Critical reflections on the 'postsocialist' condition. New York: Routledge
Greenberg, M. (2017) What makes a method of legal interpretation correct: Legal standards vs. fundamental determinants. Harvard Law Review Forum, 130(4): 105-126
Henrard, K. (2009) Minorities and socio-economic participation: The two pillars of minority protection revisited. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 16(4): 549-576
Joseph, M. (2009) Effective participation of national minorities in public affairs in light of national case law. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 16: 621-642
Kostadinova, G. (2011) Minority rights as a normative framework for addressing the situation of Roma in Europe. Oxford Development Studies, 39(2): 163-183
Malloy, H.T. (2008) Indicators for assessing the impact of the FCNM in its state oarties: (Draft study). u: Enhancing the Impact of the Framework Convention. 9-10 October 2008, Strasbourg: European Academy Bolzano
Malloy, T.H., Wolf, S. (2016) Linguistic minority rights in the Danish-German border region: Reciprocity and public administration policies. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 23(4): 485-504
Moore, N.J. (2015) The control of foreign intervention in internal conflict. Virginia Journal of International Law, 9(2): 205-342
OSCE (1999) The lund recommendations on the effective participation of bational minorities in public life. The Hague: High Commissioner on National Minorities
OSCE (2012) The Ljubljana guidelines on integration of diverse societies & explanatory note. The Hague: High Commissioner on National Minorities
Packer, J. (2003) The OSCE High Commissioner on national minorities: Pyrometer, prophylactic, pyrosvestis. u: Ghanea, N.; Xanthaki A. [ur.] Minorities, Peoples and Self-Determination, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 249-268
Palermo, F. (2007) Legal solutions to complex societies: The law of diversity. u: Ruiz Vieytez E. J.; Dunbar, R. [ur.] Human Rights and Diversity: New Challenges for Plural Societies, Bilbao: University of Deusto, 63-82
Patten, A. (2005) The rights of internal linguistic minorities. u: Eisenberg A.; SpinnerHalev, J. [ur.] Minorities within Minorities: Equality, Rights and Diversity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135-154
Penasa, S. (2014) From protection to empowerment through participation: The case of Trentino: A laboratory for small groups. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues, 13(2): 30-53
Phillips, A. (2009) Contribution of the council of Europe Framework Convention for the protection of national minorities and its Advisory Committee to the effective participation rights of national minorities. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 16(4): 527-537
Pound, R. (1913) Justice according to law. Columbia Law Review, 13(8): 696-713
Ringelheim, J., Bribosia, E., Rorive, I. (2010) Reasonable accommodation for religious minorities: A promising concept for European antidiscrimination law. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 17(2): 137-161
Roter, P. (2015) Additional opinion on the action plan for the realisation of the rights of national minorities of the Republic of Serbia. Available at: https://pjp-eu.coe.int/en/ web/minority-rights/images/additional%20opinion%20on%20the%20action%20 plan%20and%20the%20revised%20action%20plan%20from%2020%20january%20 2016%20-%20dr%20petr
Rubio, M.R. (2003) Language rights: Exploring the competing rationales. u: Kymlicka, W.; Patten, A. [ur.] Language Rights and Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 52-79
Tobler, C. (2008) Limits and potential of the concept of indirect discrimination. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
UN Human Rights Committee (1996) General Comment NNo. 25: Article 25: (Participation in public affairs and the right to vote), the right to participate in public affairs, voting rights and the right of equal access to public service. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/ Add.7, (12 July)
UN Sub-Commission On The Promotion And Protection Of Human Rights (2005) Commentary of the working group on minorities to the United Nations declaration on the rights of persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities. E/ CN.4/Sub.2/AC.5/2005/2 (adopted on 4 April )
Vacca, A. (2016) Rights to use minority languages in the public administration and public institutions: Italy, Spain and the UK. Torino: Giappichelli
van Parijs, P. (2003) Linguistic justice. u: Kymlicka W.; Patten A. [ur.] Language Rights and Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 153-168
Venice Commission (2011) The participation of minorities in public life. u: Science and technique of democracy, Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, no. 45
Verstichel, A. (2002) Elaborating a catalogue of best practices of effective participation of national minorities: Review of the opinions of the Advisory Committee regarding Article 15 of the council of Europe Framework Convention for the protection of national minorities. European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online, 2(1): 165-195
Vukojičić, T.T. (2017) Suvremeni pristupi i modeli zapošljavanja društvenih manjina u javnoj upravi. Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava, 17(3): 365-388
Weller, M. (2004) Creating the conditions necessary for the effective participation of persons belonging to national minorities. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 10(4): 265-290