Metrika članka

  • citati u SCindeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[=>]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:8
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:6
članak: 1 od 1  
Ekonomika poljoprivrede
2019, vol. 66, br. 1, str. 143-157
jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: pregledni članak
doi:10.5937/ekoPolj1901143V

Creative Commons License 4.0
Future drivers of rural prosperity in knowledge age: Lithuanian case
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
aLithuanian Institute of Agrarian economics, Vilnius, Lithuania
bUniversity of Kragujevac, Faculty of hotel management and tourism in Vrnjačka Banja, Vrnjačka Banja

e-adresa: rita.vilke@laei.lt, zivile.gedminaite@laei.lt, dra

Sažetak

(ne postoji na srpskom)
The knowledge age greatly shaped society's understanding of what goes beyond the agribusiness and sharply raised the question of farmers' responsibilities on the way they do farming in relation to the payments they receive as public support. Therefore the new rural prosperity drivers in knowledge age calls for the new principles of European Union support distribution for agriculture and rural development. The aim of this research is to explore future drivers of rural prosperity based on knowledge society measures. It is argued, that the upcoming European Union rural prosperity is guided by knowledge philosophy encompassing the nexus among 'innovating', 'networking' and 'giving back' to society. Original empirical data, collected in Lithuanian in 2017, explores farmers' attitudes towards listed knowledge society measures in relation to farm size and other relevant characteristics. Research findings suggest more promising directions for agriculture and rural development that contributes better for rural prosperity in knowledge age.

Ključne reči

Reference

*** Ethical CSR leadership: Passion or fashion. International Journal of Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility (IJSECSR), 2(2), 1-22
Boyd, B., Henning, N., Reyna, E., Wang, D., Welch, M., Hoffman, A.J. (2017) Hybrid organizations: New business models for environmental leadership. Routledge
Carroll, A.B., Brown, J.A. (2018) Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Current Concepts, Research, and Issues. u: Weber James, Wasieleski David M. [ur.] Corporate Social Responsibility, Emerald, 39-69
Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., de Massis, A., Frattini, F., Wright, M. (2014) The Ability and Willingness Paradox in Family Firm Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3): 310-318
Duh, E.S., Kos, A. (2016) Fablabs as Drivers for Open Innovation and Co-creation to Foster Rural Development. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 214-216
Dunne, T.C., Aaron, J.R., McDowell, W.C., Urban, D.J., Geho, P.R. (2016) The impact of leadership on small business innovativeness. Journal of Business Research, 69(11): 4876-4881
Esparcia, J. (2014) Innovation and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects. Journal of Rural Studies, 34: 1-14
European Commission (2018) CAP expenditure and CAP reform path. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/cap-funding/pdf/capspending-09-2018_en.pdf
Fink, M., Lang, R., Richter, R. (2017) Social Entrepreneurship in Marginalised Rural Europe: Towards Evidence-Based Policy for Enhanced Social Innovation. Regions Magazine, 306(1): 6-10
Friedrich, von den E.S., Freiling, J., Matzler, K. (2015) Why business model innovations fail. Journal of Business Strategy, 36(6): 29-38
Hardingham, E., Vrbka, J., Kliestik, T., Kliestikova, J. (2018) Will Cognitive Technology-Driven Automation Lead to Economic Growth?. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 6(4): 13-18
Horlings, L.G., Marsden, T.K. (2014) Exploring the 'New Rural Paradigm' in Europe: Eco-economic strategies as a counterforce to the global competitiveness agenda. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(1): 4-20
Jentsch, B. (2017) Young People in Rural Areas of Europe. Taylor & Francis
Kusano, S., Wright, M., Conger, A. (2016) Development and assessment of self-agency, and the ability to innovate and take risks. Center for Research on Learning and Teaching Occasional Paper, 34
Lambrecht, E., Taragola, N., Kühne, B., Crivits, M., Gellynck, X. (2015) Networking and innovation within the ornamental plant sector. Agricultural and Food Economics, 3(1):
Lavesson, N. (2016) When and how does commuting to cities influence rural employment growth?. Journal of Regional Science, 57(4): 631-654
Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics (2017) Agriculture and Food sector in Lithuania in 2016. Vilnius
Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics (2016) Agriculture and Food sector in Lithuania in 2015. Vilnius
Liu, Y., Li, Y. (2017) Revitalize the world's countryside. Nature, 548(7667): 275-277
Madureira, H., Nunes, F., Oliveira, J.V., Cormier, L., Madureira, T. (2015) Urban residents' beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1): 56-64
Mather, A.S., Hill, G., Nijnik, M. (2006) Post-productivism and rural land use: cul de sac or challenge for theorization?. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(4): 441-455
Mazur-Wierzbicka, E. (2015) The Application of Corporate Social Responsibility in European Agriculture. Miscellanea Geographica, 19(1): 19-23
Murdoch, J. (2000) Networks - a new paradigm of rural development?. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(4): 407-419
Neary, B., Horák, J., Kovacova, M., Valaskova, K. (2018) The Future of Work: Disruptive Business Practices, Technology-Driven Economic Growth, and Computer-Induced Job Displacement. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 6(4): 19
Neumeier, S. (2016) Social innovation in rural development: identifying the key factors of success. Geographical Journal, 183(1): 34-46
Nica, E., Manole, C., Stan, C.I. (2018) A Laborless Society? How Highly Automated Environments and Breakthroughs in Artificial Intelligence Bring About Innovative Kinds of Skills and Employment Disruptions, Altering the Nature of Business Process and Affecting the Path of Economic Growth. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 6(4): 25
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., Neely, A. (2005) Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5-6(3-4): 137-168
Reimers-Hild, C., Dye, A. (2015) Become a Future-Focused Leader: Use Three Megatrends to Grow Your Rural Business
Reimers-Hild, C.I., Dye, A. (2015) How to Grow Your Rural Business with Purpose and Meaning
Salemink, K., Strijker, D., Bosworth, G. (2017) Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54: 360-371
Schwartz, M.S. (2017) Corporate Social Responsibility. Routledge
Specht, K., Zoll, F., Siebert, R. (2016) Application and evaluation of a participatory 'open innovation' approach (ROIR): The case of introducing zero-acreage farming in Berlin. Landscape and Urban Planning, 151: 45-54
Sumane, S., Kunda, I., Knickel, K., Strauss, A., Tisenkopfs, T., Des, I., Ashkenazy, A. (2017) Local and farmers' knowledge matters! How integrating informal and formal knowledge enhances sustainable and resilient agriculture. J Rural Stud, In press, 1-10. Lee-Davies, L
Vaccaro, I.G., Jansen, J.J. P., van Den, B.F.A. J., Volberda, H.W. (2010) Management Innovation and Leadership: The Moderating Role of Organizational Size. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1): 28-51
Vidickiene, D., Melnikiene, R. (2014) Evolution of rural policy: monograph. Vilnius: Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, 272 p. ISBN 978-9955-481-44-7
Vochozka, M., Kliestik, T., Kliestikova, J., Sion, G. (2018) Participating in a highly automated society: how artificial intelligence disrupts the job market. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 13(4): 57
Whitby, M. C., Willis, K. G. (2017) Rural Resource Development. Routledge