- citati u SCIndeksu: [3]
- citati u CrossRef-u:[2]
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:28
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:24
|
|
2019, br. 47, str. 199-206
|
Fukoov koncept odnosa između znanja i moći
Foucalt's concept of the relationships between power and knowledge
Projekat: Materijalna i duhovna kultura Kosova i Metohije (MPNTR - 178028)
Sažetak
Svoju koncepciju postmodernizma i ključnih koncepata znanja i moći Fuko je razvio na osnovu svoje kritike modernizma/prosvetiteljstva. Koncept odnosa između moći i znanja tumači antibejkonski: dok je za Bejkona znanje bilo moć radi ovladavanja prirodom, za Fukoa su ove kategorije kompatibilne jer "moć kreira oblike znanja". Fuko odbija jednačinu odnosa između razuma, emancipacije i progresa. Moderni oblici moći i znanja vezani su za novi oblik dominacije. Umesto istine kao objektivne kategorije, Fuko povezuje znanje i moć ukorenjene u specifičnim institucijama (bolnice, zatvori, škole). Moć se sprovodi kroz nadzor i kažnjavanje. Fukoova koncepcija postmodernizma je podložna kritici, gde se posebno istakao Habermas. Postmodernizam je projekat koji odbija sebe, razum i konsenzus. Kritikuje postmoderniste jer se zalažu za diskontinuitet, pa, stoga, modernizam ne treba napustiti već upotpuniti.
Abstract
For Foucault power and knowledge are not seen as independent entities but are inextricable and related to each other - knowledge is always an exercise or power, and power is always a function of knowledge. It is important to say that Foucault understands power/knowledge as productive and constraining as well. Foucault also connects power and discipline. It is mechanism of power that regulates the thought and behaviour of social actors through subtle means. Modern society is a disciplinary one - power is exercised through disciplinary means in a variety of institutions (prison, schools, hospitals, militaries). Foucault's concept of power and knowledge fits into his critique of the Enlightenment era based on reason and individualism. There is no individual and universal view on the world, and no objective truth. Foucault's conception of postmodernism is subject to critique, especially by Habermas and Baudrillard. For Habermas, reason is not capacity or feature. Postmodernism is the project which rejects self, reason and consensus. They favorise discontinuity, so that modernism does not have to be abandoned, but completed. Baudrillard, from his point of view, although belongs to postmodernism, criticizes Foucault's conception of power and knowledge and speaks about its disappearance.
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
Foucault, M. (1975) Surveiller et punit. Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard
|
|
Foucault, M. (1984) The Foucault reader. London: Penguin
|
2
|
Foucault, M. (1982) The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4): 777-795, The University of Chicago Press
|
|
Kalanj, R. (1993) Mišel Fuko i problemi moći. Revija za sociologiju, Zagreb, Vol. 24, No 1-2, 77-85
|
|
Kisse, F. (2015) French Theory - Fuko, Derida, Delez & Co i preobražaj intelektualnog života u SAD. Paris: Carpos Supplementa Alolographica
|
11
|
Lyotard, J. (1983) The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: Univeristy of Minnesota Press, transl. by Geoff Bennington and Brian Missuri
|
3
|
Niall, L. (2016) Dictionary of postmodernism. Oxford-Malden: Wiley Blackwell
|
|
Slović, S. (2014) Fukujamin koncept države, društva i međunarodnih odnosa. Srpska politička misao, br. 3, vol. 46, 331-346, Institut za političke studije
|
|
Slović, S.Ž. (2017) Vestfalski mir - vododelnica nove uloge države u međunarodnim odnosima. Baština, br. 43, str. 209-219
|
|
|
|