Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: [1]
  • citations in CrossRef:[1]
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:0
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:0

Contents

article: 1 from 1  
2015, vol. 52, iss. 1, pp. 14-17
Weed flora in dill (Anethum graveolens L., Apiaceae, Apiales) grown in conventional and organic production systems
aUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture, Serbia
bInstitute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad, Serbia

email[email protected]
Project: Organic agriculture: Improvement of production by use of fertilizers, biopreparates and biological measures (MESTD - 31027)
Keywords: Anethum graveolens; conventional crop production; dill; organic crop production; weed infestation; weeds
Abstract
This study was performed to compare the weed flora in dill crops maintained conventionally and according to the principles of organic production. Out of 17 weed species noted for the two growing systems, even four (Amaranthus retroflexus L., Datura stramonium L., Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers., and Veronica persica Poir.) are invasive in Vojvodina region (Serbia). Weed infestation (number of individuals per m2) was significantly higher on the conventional plots (p = 0.0000**). The dominating species in conventional growing system were Convolvulus arvensis, Veronica persica and Chenopodium album (8.00, 6.67 and 5.33 individuals per m2, respectively), while Amaranthus retroflexus dominated on organic plots (8.00 individuals per m2). Regarding life forms of the recorded weed flora, therophytes dominate both in conventional (92.31%) and organic (66.67%) systems. The observed differences in weed flora are due to the specificities of dill conventional and organic production.
References
Anačkov, G., Bjelić-Čabrilo, O., Karaman, I., Karaman, M., Radenković, S., Radulović, S., Vukov, D., Boža, P. (2011) [IASV] Lista invazivnih vrsta na području AP Vojvodine = List of invasive species in AP Vojvodina [Internet]. Version 0.1beta. Novi Sad: Department of Biology and Ecology, http://iasv.dbe.pmf.uns.ac.rs/ (pristupljeno: 20140717)
Džigurski, D., Ljevnaić-Mašić, B., Nikolić, Lj. (2012) Invazivne biljke korovske flore u organskoj poljoprivredi. Acta biologica iugoslavica - serija G: Acta herbologica, 21(1): 21-29
Đurovka, M. (2008) Gajenje povrća na otvorenom polju. Novi Sad: Poljoprivredni fakultet, str. 1-248
Josifović, M., ur. (1970-1977) Flora SR Srbije, I-IX. Beograd, Srbija: SANU
Kišgeci, J. (2002) Lekovito bilje - Gajenje, sakupljanje, upotreba. Beograd: Partenon
Kojić, M., Šinžar, B., Stepić, R. (1988) Korovska vegetacija severozapadne Srbije. Zbornik radova Poljoprivrednog fakulteta, 32-33(589): 83-107
Kovačević, D. (2008) Njivski korovi-biologija i suzbijanje. Zemun, Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu, Poljoprivredni fakultet, str. 1-506
Moody, M.E., Mack, R.N. (1988) Controlling the Spread of Plant Invasions: The Importance of Nascent Foci. J Appl Ecol, 25(3): 1009-1021
Nikolić, Lj., Ilić, O., Džigurski, D., Ljevnaić-Mašić, B. (2013) Analysis of weed flora in conventional and organic potato production. Biologica Nyssana, Journal of Biological Science, 4(1-2): 9-14
Pearson, R.G., Dawson, T.P. (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?. Global Ecol Biogeogr, 12(5): 361-371
Tucakov, J. (1997) Lečenje biljem - fitoterapija. Beograd, str. 1-717
Ujvárosi, M. (1973) Gymnövények. Budapest: Mezőgazdasági Kiado, str. 1-833
Vrbničanin, S., Karadžić, B., Dajić-Stevanović, Z. (2004) Adventivne i invazivne korovske vrste na području Srbije. Acta biologica iugoslavica - serija G: Acta herbologica, 13(1): 1-12
Weibull, A.C., Östman, Ö., Granqvist, A. (2003) Species richnes in agroecosystems; the effect of landscape, habitat and farm management. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12(7): 1335-1355
 

About

article language: English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/ratpov52-7220
published in SCIndeks: 03/04/2015
peer review method: double-blind

Related records

Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)

Top SDG Classifications

  • Zero Hunger (33%)

  • Responsible Consumption and Production (31%)

  • Life on Land (28%)

Goals Description