- citati u SCIndeksu: [9]
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:6
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:0
|
|
|
2012, vol. 60, br. 1, str. 137-158
|
|
O položaju oštećenog u krivičnom postupku
On the position of an injured party in criminal proceedings
Sažetak
U radu su razmotrene značajne promene do kojih je poslednjih decenija došlo u sagledavanju položaja oštećenog u krivičnom postupku. Autor ističe da je načelni zahtev da se sa oštećenim u krivičnom postupku ima postupati saosećajno, sa poštovanjem i uz uvažavanje njegovog dostojanstva, proklamovan u brojnim međunarodnim dokumenima. Usled toga je u uporednom pravu procesni položaj oštećenog dobio zapaženo mesto, pri čemu normativno uređenje ovog pitanja ima dva aspekta. Prvi se odnosi na nastojanje oštećenog da u krivičnom postupku ostvari imovinskopravni zahtev, dok je drugi aspekt posledica potrebe za preduzimanjem mera za sprečavanje njegove sekundarne viktimizacije. Kada je reč o srpskom pravu, autor zaključuje da je ono na tragu postojećih uporednih rešenja u ovoj oblasti, i to kako u pogledu procesnog položaja oštećenog u krivičnom postupku, tako i u odnosu na mere njegove procesne zaštite. Određene promene do kojih je došlo u procesnom položaju oštećenog, posledica su nove koncepcije krivičnog postupka, s tim da je prilikom njihovog zakonskog uređenja vođeno računa o standardima ljudskih prava. Sa tim u vezi, autor ukazuje na veliki značaj koji za ovu problematiku imaju standardi koji su izgrađeni u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. U okviru njih se položaj oštećenog u krivičnom postupku sagledava kako u svetlu prava na pravično suđenje, tako i u okviru koncepta evropskog javnog poretka.
Abstract
The paper considers important changes which have ensued in the last decade and so regarding views on the position of an injured party in criminal proceedings, and which come as a result of an endeavor to strengthen the process of pacification of custom. The author emphasizes that greater sensitivity towards injuries or jeopardizing of personal or property rights of an injured party has primarily led to a principal stand that he/she should be treated during criminal proceedings with compassion, respect, and with valuing of his/her dignity. This approach, which has been proclaimed in numerous international documents, has resulted in an intensified interest for the rights of injured parties in criminal proceedings which has led to a noticeable movement in comparative law for the establishment of a legal framework that would guarantee a procedural position and the rights of the injured party. With all the differences highlighted in the paper, the author concludes that the legislative framework pertaining to the position of an injured party essentially has two aspects. First pertains to the attempt of the injured party to satisfy his/her restitution claim in criminal proceedings, while the second aspect comes as a result of a need to take measures in order to prevent secondary victimization. When it comes to Serbian legal system, the author concludes that it follows the existing comparative legal solutions in this field, both in relation to the procedural position of an injured party in criminal proceedings, as well as in relation to his/her procedural protection. Certain changes that have taken place regarding the procedural position of an injured party have come as a result of a new concept of criminal proceedings during whose legal drafting attention was paid to human rights standards. Relatedly, the author points out the great significance of standards developed by the European Court of Human Rights to this issue. Within this framework, the position of an injured party in criminal proceedings is viewed both in light of the right to a fair trial, as well as within the concept of a European public order. The said two aspects sometimes have to be analyzed in parallel having in mind that the European Court of Human Rights in its decisions often views the right to a fair trial in the context of 'core' human rights.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
*** (2005) Krivični zakonik. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 85, 88
|
|
|
*** (2008-2011) Zakon o kaznenom postupku. Narodne novine Republike Hrvatske, br. 152/08, 76/09 i 80/11
|
|
|
*** (2008) Zakon o novčanoj naknadi žrtvama kaznenih djela. Narodne novine, br. 80
|
|
|
*** (2011) Zakonik o krivičnom postupku. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 72 i br. 101
|
|
|
Banović, B., Ilić, A. (2011) Mere zaštite svedoka u novom Zakoniku o krivičnom postupku, Nova rešenja u krivičnom procesnom zakonodavstvu - teoretski i praktični aspekt. u: Bejatović S. [ur.] XLVIII redovno godišnje savetovanje Udruženja za krivičnopravnu teoriju i praksu, Zlatibor – Beograd, 121
|
|
1  
|
Bejatović, S. (2005) Nove tendencije u savremenoj nauci krivičnog prava i krivičnoprocesno zakonodavstvo Srbije. Bezbednost, Beograd, vol. 47, br. 5, str. 721-753
|
|
1
|
Beliveau, P., Vauclair, M. (2000) Traité général de preuve et de procédure pénales. Montreal: Faculte de droit Universite de Montreal
|
|
|
Bonfils, P. (2006) La participation de la victime au proces penal une action innomme. u: Casarola F., i dr. [ur.] Le droit penal a laube du troisieme millenaire Melanges offerts a Jean Pradel, Paris: Edition Cujas, 181
|
|
6
|
Brkić, S. (2005) Zaštita svedoka u krivičnom postupku. Novi Sad
|
|
|
Chiavario, M. (2002) Private parties: the rights of the defendant and the victim. u: Delmas-Marty M., Spencer J.R. [ur.] European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 544
|
|
1
|
d'Hauteville Anne (2003) Le droit des victims. u: Cabrillac R. , Frison-Roche M.A., Revet T. [ur.] Libertes et droits fondamentaux, Paris: Dalloz, 560
|
|
1
|
Dimitrijević, V., i dr. (2006) Međunarodno pravo ljudskih prava. Beograd: Beogradski centar za ljudska prava, Biblioteka Udžbenici
|
|
1
|
Douglas, B.E. (1999) The third model of criminal process: The victim participation model. Utah Law Review, 2/299
|
|
1
|
Đurđević, Z. (2004) Odluka o kazni - kaznenoprocesna pitanja. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 2, 11, 758-760
|
|
1
|
Guinchard, S., Buisson, J. (2002) Procédure pénale. Paris: Litec
|
|
|
Henrion, H. (2008) Y a-t-il une place pour la victime en procedure penale allemande?. u: Guidicelli-Delage G., Lazerge C. [ur.] La victime sur la scene en Europe, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, coll. Les voies du droit
|
|
7 
|
Ignjatović, Đ., Simeunović-Patić, B. (2011) Viktimologija. Beograd: Pravni fakultet
|
|
44
|
Ignjatović, Đ.M. (2011) Kriminologija. Beograd: Dosije
|
|
3
|
Ilić, G.P. (2005) Pojam, zadatak, subjekti i radnje prethodnog krivičnog postupka. u: Policija i pretkrivični i prethodni krivični postupak, Beograd: VŠUP
|
|
4
|
Ilić, G.P. (2011) Pravo na obrazloženu sudsku odluku. Crimen, vol. 2, br. 2, str. 227-244
|
|
|
Ilić, G.P. (2010) Zaštita oštećenog u krivičnom postupku, Nasilnički kriminal: etiologija, fenomenologija, prevencija ED Kron L. Beograd: Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, 78
|
|
|
Ilić, G.P., Majić, M., Nikolić, B. (2006) Komentar Zakona o Programu zaštite učesnika u krivičnom postupku - sa uporednopravnim pregledom i merama procesne zaštite. Beograd: OEBS Misija u Srbiji i Crnoj Gori, 42, 43
|
|
14
|
Jakšić, A. (2006) Evropska konvencija o ljudskim pravima - komentar. Beograd: Pravni fakultet
|
|
|
Jung, E. (1981) Die Stellung des Verletzten im Strafverfahren. ZStW, 93, 1150
|
|
5
|
Krapac, D. (2010) Nezakoniti dokazi u kaznenom postupku prema praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 60(6): 1207-1240
|
|
1
|
Kuijer, M. (2004) The blindfold of Lady Justice Judicial Independence and Impartiality in Light of the Requirements of Article 6 ECHR. Leiden: Leiden University - E. M Meijers Institute of Legal Studies
|
|
|
Lanthiez, L. (2008) La clarification des fondements europeens des droits des victims. u: Guidicelli-Delage G., Lazerge C. [ur.] La victime sur la scene en Europe, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, coll. Les voies du droit
|
|
26
|
Lazarević, L. (2006) Komentar Krivičnog zakonika Republike Srbije. Beograd: Savremena administracija
|
|
4
|
Lukić, T. (2011) Uticaj međunarodnih pravnih standarda na oblikovanje pripremnog stadijuma krivičnog postupka. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 59, br. 2, str. 142-162
|
|
|
Martini, A. (2008) La victime en Angleterre. u: Guidicelli-Delage G., Lazerge C. [ur.] La victime sur la scene en Europe, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, coll. Les voies du droit, 53
|
|
1
|
Mcconville, M. (2002) Plea bargaining. u: Mcconville M. , Wilson G. [ur.] The handbook of the criminal justice process, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 373, 374
|
|
|
Mechin, M. (2008) Le double visage de la victime en France, entre quete de reconnaissance et quete d'un veritable role procedurale. u: Guidicelli-Delage G., Lazerge C. [ur.] La victime sur la scene en Europe, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, coll. Les voies du droit, 115
|
|
1
|
Mikieli, L. (2008) Jedno nasilnije društvo? - društveno-istorijska analiza interpersonalnih nasilja u Francuskoj od 1970. godine do danas - II deo. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 56, br. 2, str. 5-24
|
|
|
Ottenhof, R. (2002) Les Droits des Victimes en Droit Penal International. u: International Criminal Law: Quo Vadis?, Proceedings of the International Conference, 28 November-3 December, Siracusa, Italy, on the Occasion of the 30th Anniversary of ISISC, Nouvelles etudes penales, No 19, Ramonville Saint-Agne 2004, 519, 520
|
|
4
|
Ovey, C., White, R.C.A. (2006) European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, str. 62
|
|
|
Packer, H.L. (1968) The limits of the criminal sanction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
|
|
|
Pavišić, B. (2008) Novi hrvatski zakon o kaznenom postupku. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, Zagreb, br. 2
|
|
|
Piquerez, G. (2000) Procedure penale suisse Traue theorique et pratique. Zurich: Schulthess
|
|
9
|
Pradel, J., Corstens, G. (2009) Droit pénal européen. Paris: Dalloz, str. 335
|
|
3
|
Renucci, J.F. (2002) Droit européen des droits de l'homme. Paris, str. 662-675
|
|
|
Rodolphe, J.–Birmann (2002) The German system. u: Delmas-Marty M., J.R.Spencer [ur.] European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
|
|
|
Saeki, M. (2010) Victim participation in criminal trials in Japan, International Journal of Law. Crime and Justice, 38: 149-165
|
|
|
Schunemann, B. (1986) Zur Stellung des Opfers im System der Strafrechtspflege. NStZ, 198
|
|
|
Sudre, F. (2001) Droit international et européen des droits de l'homme. Paris: PUF
|
|
|
Tomašević, G., Pajčić, M. (2008) Subjekti u kaznenom postupku: pravni položaj žrtve i oštećnika u novom hrvatskom kaznenom postupku. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 2, 15, 829-831
|
|
5
|
Trechsel, S. (2005) Human rights in criminal proceedings. Oxford: Oxford University Press
|
|
|
Trumbull, C.P. (2008) The Victims of Victim Participation in International Criminal Proceedings. Michigan Journal of International Law, 29: 780
|
|
8
|
van Dijk, P., van Hoof, G.J.H. (2001) Teorija i praksa Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima. Sarajevo: Müller
|
|
|
|
|