Akcije

Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
kako citirati ovaj članak
podeli ovaj članak
Direktan link

Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: [5]
  • citati u CrossRef-u:[3]
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:10
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:4

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 1  
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
2015, vol. 63, br. 3, str. 112-126
Acquisition of ownership of real property by contract in Serbian law: Departing from the titulus-modus system?
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
Živković Miloš
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet

e-adresa: mdz@ius.bg.ac.rs
Ključne reči: Acquisition of Real Property; Iustus titulus; Modus acquirendi
Sažetak
(ne postoji na srpskom)
This paper examines the systems of contractual acquisition of ownership of real property in various civil law jurisdictions. It then presents Serbian legislative solutions in that respect, commonly denoted as titulus-modus system. It particularly emphasizes recent departures from the traditional system in respect of acquisition of ownership of real property in the current practice of Serbian courts and in recent legislation. These developments seem to indicate a certain shift towards a system of conveyance effect of the contract itself, resembling in some aspects the French law. This development is subjected to critical analysis, the conclusion of which is that there needs to be a consistent application of a chosen system, once it is chosen. Finally, the author proposes a solution that would achieve such goal and increase the level of legal certainty.
Reference

*** Decision of the Supreme Court of Cassation, Rev. 385/2010(1) dated 30 June 2010 (contract without registration cannot lead to acquisition of ownership)

*** Decision of the Commercial Appellate Court, Pž. 2739/2010 dated 20 October 2010 (registration without the valid contract, as well as contract without registration, are insufficient for acquisition of ownership). all available in database Paragraf Lex

*** Decision of the Commercial Appellate Court, Pž. 6835/2010(1) dated 14 April 2010 (if the contract upon which the seller acquired his ownership is void, the ownership of the buyer falls, and the sale contract is also void

*** Decision of the Commercial Appellate Court, Pž. 8186/2014 dated 21 August 2014 (the successor in law cannot acquire nor transfer to other more rights than what his predecessor in law actually had). all available in database Paragraf Lex

*** Decision of the Commercial Appellate Court, Pž. 7975/2013(2) dated 2. October 2014 (proof of payment of purchase price and of possession can replace registration as modus acquirendi

*** Decision of the Commercial Appellate Court, Pž. 8712/2013(2) dated 13. November 2014 (for unregistered real property, price payment and transfer of possession are modus acquirendi). all available in database Paragraf Lex

*** (1987) Bilten sudske prakse VSS / Court Practice Bulletin of the VSS, 3, 5

*** (2005) Decision of the supreme court of Serbia. Rev. 1/2004 dated 19 April 2005 n(good faith principle decisive in case of multiple alienation, and irrelevant outside that scenario)

*** (2007) Decision of the higher commercial court. Pž. 9360/2006 dated 30 January 2007 (possession decisive when both acquirers from the same transferor are in good faith)

*** (1980/1990/2005) Zakon o osnovnim svojinsko-pravnim odnosima. Official gazette of the Republic of Serbia, Nos. 6/1980 and 36/1990

*** (2012) Draft Property Code. http://www.ius.bg.ac.rs/prof/Materijali/xivmil/NACRT%20ZAKONIKA%20O%20SVOJINI.pdf, last visited on April 6, 2015

*** (2008) Decision of the Higher Commercial Court. Sudska praksa trgovinskih sudova, No. 4 (both iustus titulus and modus acquirendi required for acquiring ownership)

*** (2008) Decision of the higher commercial court. Sudska praksa trgovinskih sudova – Bilten / Case Law of Commercial Courts, Bulletin, Pž. 2010/2008(1) dated 8 May 2008, No. 4/2008 (among the acquirers in good faith, the one having possession prevails)

*** (2010) Decision of the supreme court of cassation. Rev. 1177/2010 dated 8 July 2010 (awareness of the existence of the previous contract, even if it is formally inadequate but apt for convalescence, renders the subsequent acquirer in bad faith), all a

*** (2015) Bilten sudske prakse privrednih sudova [Bulletin of Case Law of Commercial Courts], No. 1, 48-50

*** (1998-2009) Law on transfer of immovable property. Official gazette of RS, Nos. 42/1998, 42/2009

*** (2014-2015) Law on transfer of immovable property came into force on 1 September 2014. Official gazette of RS, Nos. 93/2014, 121/2014 and 6/2015

Baur, J., Sturner, R. (2009) Sachenrecht. Munchen, 284 et seq. (for immovable property), 635 et seq. (for movables)

Buchholz, S. (1978) Abstraktionsprinzip und Immobiliarrecht. Frankfurt a.M, 1 et seq

1

Demelius, E. (1900) Grundris des Sachenrechts. Leipzig, 24

5

Ehrenzweig, A. (1923) System des osterreihischen allgemainen Privatsrechts, Bd I: Sachenrecht. Wien, str, 55

Ghestin, J., Jamin, C., Billiau, M. (2001) Traité de droit civil: Les effets du contrat. Paris, 855

Gschnizer, F. (1968) Sachenrecht. Wien, 90-94

Gschnizer, F. (1985) Osterreichisches Sachenrecht. Wien, 99-104

Iro, G. (2010) Bürgerliches Recht: Sachenrecht. Wien, Band IV, 129 et seq

Klang, H. (1931) u: Klang H. [ur.] Kommentar zum Allgemeinen burgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Wien: Erster band Zweiter Halbband, 151-152

Kletečka, A., Koziol, H., Welser, R. (2006) Bürgerliches Recht. Wien, 310–311, 325–329

11

Koziol, H.V., Welser, R. (1996) Grundriss des bürgerlichen Rechts. Wien: Manz, Band I und II, 5

Krainz, J., Pfaff, L., Ehrenzweig, A. (1913) System des osterreichischen allgemeinen Privatrechts, Band I Der allgemeine Teil und das Sachenrecht. Wien, 5, 135–137, 581 et seq., 624–626

Marković, L. (1927) Građansko pravo - opšti deo i stvarno pravo / Civil law: General part and property law. Beograd, I, I, 2, 353–356, 370 et seq

Martinek, M. (2012) Kollegiale Reflexionen zur Didaktik des Abstraktionsprinzips: Wie lehren wir es und was lehrt es uns?. u: Stamm Jurgen [ur.] Festschrift fur Helmut Rusmann, Saarbrucken, 95 et seq

Povlakić, M. (2009) Transformacija stvarnog prava u Bosni i Hercegovini / Transformation of property law in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sarajevo, 125 et seq

Ripert, G., Boulanger, J. (1957) Traite de droit civil, d'apres le traite de Planiol: Obligations-Droits Reels. u: Il [le contrat] est translatif de propriete, Paris, Tome II, 854, emphasis in original text

Schwab, K.H., Prutting, H. (2006) Sachenrecht. Munchen, 137 et seq. (for immovable property), 144 et seq. (for movables)

47

Stanković, O., Orlić, M. (1999) Stvarno pravo. Beograd: Nomos

Vodinelić, V. (2012) Građansko pravo - uvod u građansko pravo i Opšti deo građanskog prava/Civil law: Introduction to civil law and general part of civil law. Beograd, n117-120

Westermann, H.P., Gursky, K.H., Eickmann, D. (2011) Sachenrecht. Heidelberg, 634 et seq. (for immovable property), 305 et seq. (for movables)

1

Wolff, M., Raiser, L. (1957) Sachenrecht. Tubingen, 211 et seq. (for immovable property), 233 et seq. (for movables)

Zénati, F. (1988) Les biens. Paris, Alfred Rieg, Le role de la volonté dans l’acte juridique en droit civil français et allemande, Paris 1961, 489

Živković, M. (2004) Real Estate Registers. u: Property Law Amendments in Serbia, Belgrade

Živković, M. (2004) Acquisition of Right of Property. u: Property Law Amendments in Serbia, Belgrade

1

Živković, M. (2010) O kvalitetu novijih građanskopravnih propisa u Srbiji. Pravni zapisi, vol. 1, br. 1, str. 119-138
   

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: članak
DOI: 10.5937/AnaliPFB1503112Z
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 27.02.2016.

Povezani članci

Anali Pravnog fak Beograd (2011)
Pravni položaj prethodnog naslednika
Đurđević Dejan B.

Zb Pravnog fak Novi Sad (2017)
Načelo upisa u registar nepokretnosti sa osvrtom na sudsku praksu
Tešanović Jelena J.

Zb Pravnog fak Novi Sad (2019)
Priroda rokova za sudsku državinsku zaštitu (čl. 77 ZOSPO)
Knežević Marko S., i dr.

prikaži sve [61]