Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:8
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:5

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 1  
2019, vol. 91, br. 2, str. 189-211
Digitalne tehnologije, rješavanje građanskih i potrošačkih sporova i pružanje pravne pomoći
Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku, Pravni fakultet, Osijek, Hrvatska
Ključne reči: access to justice; computer technology; civil justice system reform; market for legal services; lawyers; legal business
Sažetak
(ne postoji na srpskom)
In this paper the author discusses the various ways of utilizing legal tech within the systems of civil justice. Some well-known legal tech platforms are put into the context of the efforts of the Croatian and Serbian governments to increase the overall efficiency of their justice systems, with the aid of computerization and the introduction of modern information technologies in the area of procedural law, as well as other areas of law. The core thesis of the paper is that the implementation of various advanced software solutions can make our justice systems more efficient, open and user-friendly for certain types of commercial, civil and consumer disputes, as well as quicker in administering and processing low value claims. Altogether, if properly employed, legal tech can contribute to justice system reform and help with restoring citizens' and businesses' confidence in the legal system. It is envisaged that once they become fully functional, the new technologies and robot systems will create pressure on law firms and law practitioners. It is reasonable to expect that lawyers will have to transform their current model of business, accept the postulates of modern legal service markets and reform their ethical rules, all in order to keep pace with the rapid development of technology and the omnipresent changes in the business environment and consumer behavior that can be easily detected and tracked all over the developed parts of the world.
Reference
*** (2019) Report from the Commission to the Eueopean Parliament, the Concil and the European economic and social Committee on the application of Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer d. COM, Brussels, 25. 9. 2019, (2019) 425 final
Bratković, M. (2015) Reorganizacija ovrhe na temelju vjerodostojne isprave u Sloveniji. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Rijeci, 36(2)
Civil Justice Council (2015) Online dispute resolution for low value civil claims. Februry
Corrales, M., et al., ur. (2019) Legal tech: Smart contracts and block chain. Springer
Cortes, P. (2011) Online dispute resolution for consumers in the European Union. Routledge
Devenney, J., Kenny, M., ur. (2012) European consumer protection: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press
Genn, H. (2017) Online courts and the future of justice: Birkenhead lecture
Gramke, K., et al. (2013) Der Rechtsdienstleistungsmarkt 2030. Deutscher Anwaltverein (DAV
Hartung, M., et al. (2018) Legal tech: How technology is changing the legal world: A practitioner's guide. Beck
Hodges, C., et al. (2010) The costs and funding of civil litigation: A comparative perspective. CH Beck/Hart
Jakšić, A. (2017) Građansko procesno pravo. Beograd, deveto izdanje
Jelinić, Z. (2013) Nagrada za rad odvjetnika i troškovi parničnog postupka - teorijski i komparativni aspekti. Pravo u gospodarstvu, časopis za gospodarsko-pravnu teoriju i praksu, 52, 2, 487-514
Jelinić, Z. Odvjetničko pružanje pravnih usluga pro bono-etički problem ili interpretativni izazov. u: Liber amicorum Aldo Radolović, Pravni fakultet, Sveučilište u Rijeci, 195-213
Jelinić, Z. (2011) Regulacija odvjetničke djelatnosti iz perspektive pravila o tržišnom natjecanju. u: Međunarodni naučni skup, 5. maja 2011., Pravni fakultet u Kragujevcu, Zbornik referata, Kragujevac: Institut za pravne i društvene nauke, Pravni fakultet, 617-659
Jelinić, Z. (2015) Sudska praksa u građanskim predmetima u sustavu primjene i tumačenja prava. u: Rijavec V., i dr. [ur.] Aktualnosti građanskog procesnog prava - nacionalna i usporedna pravnoteorijska i praktična dostignuća, međunarodno savjetovanje, Split 19-20. studeni 2015. godine, Zbornik radova, 173-200
Katsh, E., Rabinovich-Einy, O. (2017) Digital justice: Techonology and the internet of disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Kawano, M. (2010) Courses of proceedings by electronic means. u: Colloquium of the International Association of Procedural Law, September, 23-25, University of Pecs, Faculty of Law
Kengyel, M., et al., ur. (2012) Electronic technology and civil procedure: New paths to justice from around the world. Springer
Lim, T.W. (2019) Industrial revolution 4.0, tech giants, and digitezed societies. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan
Rule, C. (2002) Online dispute resolution for business. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Schwab, K. (2016) The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum
Susskind, R. (2008) The end of lawyers?: Rethinking the nature of legal services. Oxford University Press
Susskind, R., Susskind, D. (2015) The future of the professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford University Press
Tomlinson, J. (2019) Justice in the digital state: Assessing the next revolution in administrative justice. Policy Press
Triva, S., Dika, M. (2004) Građansko parnično procesno pravo. Zagreb: Narodne novine, sedmo izmijenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje
Uzelac, A. (2002) Reforma pravosuđa i njezina ograničenja - slučaj imenovanja predsjednika sudova u Republici Hrvatskoj i njegove pouke. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 52(2)
Wagner, J. (2018) Legal Tech und Legal Robots: Der Wandel im Rechtsmarkt durch neue Technologien und künstliche Intelligenz. München: Springer/Gabler
Wang, F.F. (2009) Online dispute resolution: Technology, management and legal practice from an international perspective. Oxford: Chandos Publishing
Xucla, J. (2015) Report to committee: Access to justice and the Internet: Potential and challenges. Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe, Doc. 13918, 10 November
 

O članku

jezik rada: hrvatski
vrsta rada: pregledni članak
DOI: 10.5937/gakv91-24346
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 31.03.2020.
metod recenzije: dvostruko anoniman
Creative Commons License 4.0

Povezani članci

Gl Adv komore Vojvodine (2011)
Metodologija izrade prvostepene presude u parničnom postupku
Radovanov Aleksandar, i dr.

Zb Pravnog fak Novi Sad (2011)
O novom uređenju voljnog zastupanja u parničnom postupku
Knežević Marko

Anali Pravnog fak Beograd (2007)
Presuda zbog izostanka po novom ZPP-u
Bodiroga Nikola

prikaži sve [63]