Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:2
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:1

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 1  
2013, vol. 46, br. 3, str. 299-314
Karakteristike i činioci pristupa studiranju studenata nastavničkih fakulteta
aUniverzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet sporta i fizičkog vaspitanja
bUniverzitet u Beogradu, Učiteljski fakultet

e-adresadusanka.lazarevic@fsfv.bg.ac.rs
Projekat:
Identifikacija, merenje i razvoj kognitivnih i emocionalnih kompetencija važnih društvu orijentisanom na evropske integracije (MPNTR - 179018)
Koncepcije i strategije obezbeđivanja kvaliteta bazičnog obrazovanja i vaspitanja (MPNTR - 179020)

Ključne reči: pristupi studiranju; Bigzov '3P' model podučavanja i učenja; nastavnički fakulteti; uspeh u studiranju
Sažetak
Polazeći od Bigzovog '3P' modela podučavanja i učenja, cilj istraživanja je da se ispitaju zastupljenost i relacije pristupa studiranju (dubinski, površinski) sa vrstom srednjoškolskog obrazovanja, polom, vrstom nastavničkog fakulteta i uspehom u studiranju. Uzorak je činilo 356 studenata Fakulteta sporta i fizičkog vaspitanja i Učiteljskog fakulteta u Beogradu. Za ispitivanje pristupa studiranju primenjen je Bigzov Revidirani dvofaktorski upitnik o pristupima studiranju (R-SPQ-2F). Rezultati pokazuju da je na uzorku studenata u celini, dubinski pristup značajno zastupljeniji u odnosu na površinski. Analiza varijanse ukazuje da vrsta srednjoškolskog obrazovanja, pol i vrsta nastavničkog fakulteta, kao nezavisne varijable, imaju specifičan efekat na pristupe studiranju. Prema rezultatima korelacione analize postoji značajna korelacija oba pristupa studiranju sa uspehom i to pozitivna sa dubinskim, a negativna sa površinskim pristupom. Nalazi upućuju na to da je u cilju unapređenja uspeha studiranja bitno uticati na smanjivanje površinskog i podržavanje dubinskog pristupa kao poželjnog kod budućih nastavnika.
Reference
Aharony, N. (2006) The use of deep and surface learning strategies among students learning English as a foreign language in an Internet environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4): 851-866
Biggs, J.B. (1987) Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research
Biggs, J.B. (1985) The role of metalearning in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(3): 185-212
Biggs, J., Kember, D., Leung, D.Y.P. (2001) The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1): 133-149
Biggs, J. (1979) Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes. Higher Education, 8(4): 381-394
Cano, F. (2005) Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British journal of educational psychology, 75(Pt 2): 203-21
Cano, F. (2007) Approaches to learning and study orchestrations in high school students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(2): 131-151
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., Lewis, M. (2007) Personality and approaches to learning predict preference for different teaching methods. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(3): 241-250
Diseth, A. (2003) Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 17(2): 143-155
Entwistle, N.J. (1991) Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Higher Education, 22(3): 201-204
Entwistle, N.J., Tait, H. (1994) The revised approaches to study inventory. Center for Research into Learning and Instruction
Entwistle, N., Hanley, M., Hounsell, D. (1979) Identifying distinctive approaches to studying. Higher Education, 8(4): 365-380
Felder, R.M., Brent, R. (2005) Understanding Student Differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1): 57-72
Fox, R.A., McManus, I.C., Winder, B.C. (2001) The shortened Study Process Questionnaire: An investigation of its structure and longitudinal stability using confirmatory factor analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(4): 511-530
Gordon, C., Debus, R. (2002) Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context. Br J Educ Psychol, 72(Pt 4): 483-511
Gow, L., Kember, D. (1990) Does higher education promote independent learning?. Higher Education, 19(3): 307-322
Grgin, T. (2004) Edukacijska psihologija. Jastrebarsko: Naklada Slap
Harper, G., Kember, D. (1986) Approaches to Study of Distance Education Students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 17(3): 212-222
Hayes, K., Richardson, J.E. (1995) Gender, subject and context as determinants of approaches to studying in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 20(2): 215-221
Kember, D., Leung, D.Y.P. (1998) The dimensionality of approaches to learning: An investigation with confirmatory factor analysis on the structure of the SPQ and LPQ. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 395-407
Kember, D., Biggs, J., Leung, D.Y.P. (2004) Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2): 261-279
Knežević, G.D., Momirović, K. (1996) RTT9G i RTT10G - dva programa za analizu metrijskih karakteristika kompozitnih mernih instrumenata. u: Kostić Petar [ur.] Merenje u psihologiji, Beograd: Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, br. 2, str. 37-56
Marton, F., Säljö, R. (1976) On qualitative differences in learning: i-outcome and process*. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1): 4-11
Marton, F., Säaljö, R. (1976) On qualitative differences in learning-ii outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(2): 115-127
Parpala, Anna., Lindblom-Ylänne, Sari., Komulainen, Erkki., Litmanen, Topi., Hirsto, Laura. (2010) Students' approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment in different disciplines. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2): 269-282
Phan, H.P. (2008) Predicting change in epistemological beliefs, reflective thinking and learning styles: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1): 75-93
Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., Mckeachie, W.J. (1993) Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3): 801-813
Schmitt, N. (1996) Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4): 350-353
Tenjović, L. (2002) Statistika u psihologiji - priručnik. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju Društva psihologa Srbije
Tenjović, L., Smederevac, S. (2011) Mala reforma u statističkoj analizi podataka u psihologiji - malo p nije dovoljno, potrebna je i veličina efekta. Primenjena psihologija, 4(4): 317-333
Vermunt, J.D. (1996) Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31(1): 25-50
Watkins, D., Hattie, J. (1981) The learning processes of australian university students: investigations of contextual and personological factors. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(3): 384-393
Weinstein, C.E., Zimmerman, S.A., Palmer, D.R. (1988) Assessing learning strategies: The design and development of the LASSI. u: Weinstein C.E., Goetz E.T., Alexander P.A. [ur.] Learning and study strategies, New York: Academic Press, 25-40
Wilson, K.L., Smart, R.M., Watson, R.J. (1996) Gender differences in approaches to learning in first year psychology students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 66, 59-71
Wong, N., Lin, W., Watkins, D. (1996) Cross‐cultural Validation of Models of Approaches to Learning: an application of confirmatory factor analysis. Educational Psychology, 16(3): 317-327
Zeegers, P. (2001) Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. Br J Educ Psychol, 71(Pt 1): 115-32
 

O članku

jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: originalan članak
DOI: 10.2298/PSI130601006L
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 04.10.2013.
metod recenzije: dvostruko anoniman