- citati u SCIndeksu: [2]
- citati u CrossRef-u:[3]
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:5
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:5
|
|
|
2020, vol. 25, br. 2, str. 67-77
|
The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
aInstitut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd, Srbija bInstitut za uporedno pravo, Beograd, Srbija
e-adresa: maticmarina77@yahoo.com
Sažetak
(ne postoji na srpskom)
In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in idem principle in the practice of the European Court for Human Rights and Court of Justice of the EU and their interpretation of the principle in relation to the application on the criminal offences and misdemeanour offences, including administrative penal offences, against the same person for the same acts. Article followed the development in interpretation of the principle by the European Court of Human Rights in Zolotukhin case to the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the EU in Menci case. European Courts jurisprudence could be used for dialogue on challenges that the Serbian judiciary and tax authories are facing in the interpretation of legislation and application of ne bis in idem principle on criminal and misdemeanour proceedings against the same person for the same acts. The articile provides the basis for discussion on the unification of court practice.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
2   
|
Bovan, S.B. (2014) Metodski potencijali hermeneutičkog pragmatizma u razumevanju i primeni načela ne bis in idem. Crimen, vol. 5, br. 1, str. 62-74
|
|
|
Burić, Z. (2019) Ne bis in idem in European criminal law: Moving in circles?. u: Duić D., et al. [ur.] EU and comparative law issues and challenges, Series 3 (ECLIC), International scientific conference, Osijek: University of Osijek-Faculty of Law Josip Juraj Strossmayer
|
|
|
Desterbeck, F. (2019) Ne bis in idem and tax offences: How Belgium adapted its legislation to the recent case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU. Eucrim, (2): 135-141
|
|
5
|
Ilić, G.P. (2017) Načelo ne bis in idem u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. Strani pravni život, br. 3, str. 21-34
|
|
1
|
Kostić, J. (2018) Krivičnopravna zaštita finansijskih interesa Evropske unije. Beograd: Institut za uporedno pravo
|
|
|
Luchtman, M. (2018) The ECJ'S recent case law on the ne bis in idem: Implications for law enforcement in a shared legal order. Common Market Law Review, 55(6), 1717-1750
|
|
|
Matić-Bošković, M. (2016) Uloga Evropskog javnog tužioca u borbi protiv organizovanog kriminala. u: Ćirić J. [ur.] Suzbijanje organizovanog kriminala kao preduslov vladavine prava, Scientific conference, Beograd: Institut za uporedno pravo, pp. 247-258
|
|
1
|
Mirandola, S., Lasagni, G. (2019) The European ne bis in idem at the crossroads of administrative and criminal law. Eucrim, 2, 126-135
|
|
1
|
Mitsilegas, V. (2009) EU criminal law. Oxford-Portland: Hart Publishing
|
|
4
|
Mrvić-Petrović, N. (2014) Poštovanje načela ne bis in idem pri suđenju za slične prekršaje i krivična dela. Nauka, bezbednost, policija - Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo, br. 2, str. 27-39
|
|
|
Nenadic, S. (2014) Načelo ne bis in idem u Evropskoj konvenciji za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda i primena načela u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. Revija za kriminologiju i krivicno pravo, 52(2), 144-167
|
|
4
|
Peers, S. (2013) EU Justice and Home Affairs Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3rd ed
|
|
|
Satzger, H. (2012) International and European criminal law. München: Beck, C. H
|
|
|
Stojanović, S. (2007) Razvoj sistema finansiranja Evropske unije. u: Ćirić J. [ur.] 50 godina Evropske unije, Beograd: Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
|
|
53
|
Škulić, M. (2014) Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta
|
|
3
|
Trechsel, S. (2005) Human rights in criminal proceedings. New York: Oxford University Press
|
|
|
van Bockel, B. (2010) The ne bis in idem principle in EU law. Kluwer Law International
|
|
|
Vervaele, J.A.E. (2005) The transnational ne bis in idem principle in the EU: Mutual recognition and equivalent protection of human rights. Utrecht Law Review, vol. 1, 6p. 2, str. 100-118
|
|
|
Vervaele, J.A.E. (2013) Ne bis in idem: Towards a transnational constitutional principle in the EU. Utrecht Law Review, 9(4): 211-229
|
|
|
Vetzo, M. (2018) The past, present and future of the ne bis in idem dialogue between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights: The cases of Menci, Garlsson and Di Puma. Review of European Administrative Law, 11(2): 55-84
|
|
|
|
|