- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:9
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:7
|
|
|
2012, vol. 4, br. 2, str. 142-159
|
|
Umetnost i estetika - tri skorašnje perspektive
Art and aesthetics: Three recent perspectives
Research Center of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute of Philosophy, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Sažetak
Autor skicira razvoj odnosa između umetnosti i estetike u nedavnoj prošlosti. Kao svoju polaznu tačku on uzima stanovište koje su umetnici ustanovili šezdesetih godina u odnosu na filozofsku estetiku. Po njegovom mišljenju 1980 godina je predstavljala istorijski početak što se tiče transformacija i u umetnosti i u filozofiji. On zatim razmatra tri teorije umetnosti i estetike - "relacionu estetiku" Nikolasa Burioda iz devedestih, estetski projekat Žaka Ransijera iz naredne decenije i najskoriju "teoriju savremene umetnosti" koju je razvio Teri Smit. Po autorovom mišljenju, ove tri teorije estetike i umetnosti ne samo da opovrgavaju prožimajuće mišljenje da je savremena estetika shvaćena kao filozofija umetnosti još jednom odvojena od savremene umetnosti i sveta umetnosti, ali isto tako jasno ispoljavaju njihov faktički značaj i uticaj u savremenim diskusijama o umetnosti.
Abstract
The author sketches the development of the relationship between art and aesthetics in the recent past. As his starting point, he takes the position that artists established in the sixties in relation to philosophical aesthetics. In his view 1980 represented a historical threshold as concerns transformations both in art and its philosophy. He then discusses three theories of art and aesthetics - Nicolas Bourriaud's "relational aesthetics" from the nineties, Jacques Rancière's aesthetic project from the following decade, and the very recent "theory of contemporary art" developed by Terry Smith. In author's opinion, these three aesthetic or art theories not only disprove the pervasive opinion that contemporary aesthetics understood as philosophy of art is once more separated from contemporary art and the art world, but also manifest their factual import and impact in contemporary discussions on art.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
5 
|
Adorno, T.W. (1997) Aesthetic theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, Trans. R. Hullot-Kentor
|
|
1
|
Badiou, A. (2007) The century. Cambridge: Polity Press, Trans. A. Toscano
|
|
|
Bauman, Z. (1989) Legislators and Interpreters. Cambridge: Polity Press
|
|
|
Bishop, C. (2004) Antagonism and relational aesthetics. October, New York, 110: 51-79
|
|
1
|
Bourriaud, N. (2002) Relational aesthetics. Monts, France: Les presses du réel, Trans. S. Pleasance & F. Woods
|
|
1
|
Danto, A.C. (1986) The philosophical disenfranchisement of art. New York: Columbia University Press
|
|
|
Foucault, M. (1994) The order of things: An archeology of human sciences. New York: Vintage Books
|
|
|
Groys, B. (2008) Art power. Cambridge, MA: MIT
|
|
|
Haberrmas, J. (1990) Modernity: An incomplete project. u: Hal Foster [ur.] Postmodern Culture, London: Pluto Press, 3-15
|
|
1
|
Jameson, F. (1991) Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. London-New York: Verso
|
|
5
|
Jencks, C. (1987) The language of post-modern architecture. London: Academy Editions
|
|
1
|
Rancière, J. (2009) Aesthetics and its discontents. Cambridge: Polity Press, trans. S. Corcoran
|
|
|
Rancière, J. (2003) Politics and aesthetics: An interview. Angelaki, Trans. F. Morlock, 8 (2): 194-211
|
|
|
Smith, T. (2008) Introduction. u: Smith T.; Enwezor O.; Condee N. [ur.] Antinomies of Art and Culture: Modernity, Postmodernity, Contemporaneity, Durham, NC: Duke UP, pp. 1-19
|
|
|
Smith, T. (2010) Contemporary art of the world today: Patterns in transition. unpublished manuscript
|
|
|
Smith, T. (2011) Contemporary art: World currents. London: Lurence King Publishing
|
|
|
Welsch, W. (1988) Modernité et postmodernité. Les Cahiers de Philosophie, 6: 21-31
|
|
|
|
|