- citati u SCIndeksu: [2]
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:6
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:3
|
|
|
2015, vol. 6, br. 1, str. 26-51
|
|
Značaj i primena javnog slušanja na nacionalnom i lokalnom nivou
The importance and application of public hearings on national and local level
Sažetak
U radu se najpre određuje pojam javnog slušanja i višestruke koristi od primene ovog instituta u uporednom parlamentarnom pravu. Nakon analize različitih modaliteta javnog slušanja u savremenoj parlamentarnoj praksi i postupka organizovanja i održavanja javnog slušanja kroz tri faze, sugeriše se podela na tri osnovne vrste: (1) zakonodavna javna slušanja, koja se mogu označiti i kao konsultativna ili informativna, (2) kontrolna (nadzorna) i (3) istražna. Potom se analiziraju mogućnosti za održavanje sve tri pomenute vrste u domaćem pravnom okviru. Sledi ispitivanje i utvrđivanje značaja javnog slušanja posebno za nacionalni parlament, skupštine jedinica lokalne samouprave i organizacije civilnog društva. U drugom delu, autor analizira razvoj javnog slušanja u Srbiji najpre na nacionalnom nivou, tj. pravni okvir i dosadašnju praksu odbora Narodne skupštine u organizovanju i održavanju javnih slušanja. U fokusu je potom prenošenje dobre prakse sa nacionalnog na lokalni nivo i prva javna slušanja održana u skupštinama gradova i opština u Srbiji. Autor uočava da na oba nivoa vlasti javno slušanje počinje da se primenjuje na isti način - najpre na faktičkom planu (u formi tzv. tematskih sednica odbora), pa se tek potom pristupa njegovom pravnom uređenju. Nakon izvođenja zaključaka, autor nudi preporuke za dalji razvoj, odnosno unapređenje javnih slušanja na nacionalnom i lokalnom nivou.
Abstract
The article first determines a definition of public hearing and the multiple benefits of the application of this institute in comparative parliamentary law. Following an analysis of different modalities of public hearings in contemporary parliamentary practice and procedures for organisation and implementation of public hearings in three phases, the author suggests a classification of three basic types of public hearings: (1) legislative public hearings, which can also be labelled as consultative or informative, (2) control (oversight) hearings, and (3) investigative. After that, possibilities for realisation of the three mentioned types within the domestic legal framework are analysed. This is followed by an analysis and determination of the importance of public hearings, in particular for the national parliament, local self-government assemblies and civil society organisations. In the second part, the author analyses the development of public hearings in Serbia, primarily on the national level, i.e. the legal framework and previous practice of committees of the National Assembly in organisation and realisation of public hearings. Afterwards the focus is on transferring the good practice from the national to the local level and the first public hearings held in town and municipal assemblies in Serbia. The author notices that on both levels of government public hearings are initially applied in the same manner - first on the factual plan (in the form of so called thematic committee sessions) and only afterwards are they legally regulated. After conclusions, the author offers recommendations for further development, i.e. improvement of public hearings on the national and local level.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
*** (2009) Service and Accountability: Public Hearing Manual. National Democratic Institute
|
|
1   
|
Adams, B. (2004) Public Meetings and the Democratic Process. Public Administration Review, 64(1): 43-54
|
|
|
Baker, W.H., Addams, H. L., Davis, B. (2005) Critical Factors for Enhancing Municipal Public Hearings. Public Administration Review, 65(4): 490-499
|
|
|
Carson, L., Lubensky, R. (2010) Raising expectations of democratic participation: an analysis of the national human rigsts consultation. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 33(1): 34-59
|
|
|
Checkoway, B. (1981) The Politics of Public Hearings. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17(4): 566-582
|
|
|
Cole, R.L., Caputo, D.A. (1984) The Public Hearing as an Effective Citizen Participation Mechanism: A Case Study of the General Revenue Sharing Program. American Political Science Review, 78(2): 404
|
|
|
Diermeier, D., Feddersen, T.J. (2000) Information and Congressional Hearings. American Journal of Political Science, 44(1): 51
|
|
|
Hoffman, B. (2008) Minding the Gap: Legal Ideals and Strategic Action in State Legislative Hearings. Law & Social Inquiry, 33(1): 89-126
|
|
|
Kemp, R. (1988) Planning, Public Hearings, and the Politics of Discourse. u: Forester J. [ur.] Critical Theory and Public Life, MIT Press, str. 177-201
|
|
1
|
Kubiak, H. (1998) Democracy and the Individual Will. u: Democracy: Its Principles and Achievement, Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union, str. 57-65
|
|
8
|
Lovo, F. (1999) Velike savremene demokratije. Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića
|
|
|
McComas, K., Besley, J.C., Black, L.W. (2010) The Rituals of Public Meetings. Public Administration Review, 70(1): 122-130
|
|
4
|
Milosavljević, B.J. (2011) Uvod u teoriju ustavnog prava. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta Union
|
|
5
|
Milosavljević, B. (2009) Sistem lokalne samouprave u Srbiji. Beograd: Stalna konferencija gradova i opština
|
|
|
Morris, L., Giroux, R., Terlaud, C., ur. (2007) Local Government Participatory Practices Manuel: a toolkit to support public participation in municipal decision making. Ottawa: International Centre for Municipal Development
|
|
1
|
Power, G. (2012) Global Parliamentary Report: The changing nature of parliamentary representation. Geneva -New York: Inter-Parliamentary Union - United Nations Development Programme
|
|
|
Reich, J. (2008) An Interactional Model of Direct Democracy - Lessons from the Swiss Experience. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1154019, pristupljeno: 20150425
|
|
2
|
Roberts, N. (2004) Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. American Review of Public Administration, vol. 4 br. 34, Dec., 2004, str. 315-353
|
|
|
van der Leest, K., Ghimici, D., ur. (2007) Public Hearings Manual: Committee Consultations with the Public. OSCE-USAID
|
|
|
Vukadinović, S. (2011) Faktičko stanje zakonodavnog postupka u Srbiji i preporuke za njegovo unapređivanje. Beograd: Fondacija Konrad Adenauer, str. 46-63
|
|
1
|
Vukadinović, S. (2012) Odnos građana i narodnih poslanika nakon izbora. u: Izbori u domaćem i stranom pravu, Beograd: Institut za uporedno pravo, str. 240-272
|
|
4 
|
Vukadinović, S. (2010) Analiza uticaja zakonodavnog postupka na predloge zakona. Pravni zapisi, vol. 1, br. 1, str. 97-118
|
|
|
Vukadinović, S. (2012) Final Evaluation of the UNDP Project: Strengthening the Accountability of the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia. Belgrade: UNDP
|
|
|
|
|