- citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
- citati u CrossRef-u:[1]
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:27
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:22
|
|
2020, vol. 6, br. 2, str. 91-107
|
Specifičnosti upravljanja portfolijom inovacionih projekata
Specifics of innovation project portfolio management
aUniverzitet odbrane, Vojna akademija, Beograd bUniverzitet za poslovne studiјe, Banja Luka, Republika Srpska, BiH
e-adresa: aleksa.miletic@yahoo.com
Ključne reči: inovacioni projekti; inovacioni portfolio; projektni menadžment; upravljanje portfoliom inovacionih projekata (IPPM)
Sažetak
U doba turbulentnosti savremenog poslovanja, gde se inovacije pozicioniraju kao ključni faktor kreiranja konkurentske prednosti i resursno-orijentisane strategije, kada u prvi plan dolaze ljudski kapital i intelektualna svojina, upravljanje portfoliom inovacionih projekata postaje moćno oružje, ali samo ako se njime ispravno rukuje. Razlike između klasičnih projekata sa jedne strane i inovacionih projekata sa druge strane, koje karakteriše pre svega izuzetno visok stepen rizika i uticaja ljudskog faktora, tj. kreativnosti, iziskuju komparativnu analizu samih projekata i njihovih portfolia, kako bi se došlo do zaključaka neophodnih za uspešno upravljanje inovacionim portfoliom. Zbog specifičnosti inovacionih projekata i inovacionog portfolia, metode i tehnike koje se koriste u upravljanja portfoliom klasičnih projekata ne garantuju uspešnost ako se primenjuju na portfolio inovacionih projekata. Uočavanja različitosti i osobenosti jednih i drugih predstavlja prvi korak u kreiranju metodologije koja bi dala očekivane rezultate.
Abstract
In an age of turbulence in modern business, where innovation is positioned as a key factor in creating competitive advantage and resource-oriented strategy, where human capital and intellectual property come to the fore, portfolio management of innovation projects becomes a powerful weapon, but only if handled properly. Differences between classic projects on the one hand and innovation projects on the other, characterized primarily by an extremely high degree of risk and impact of the human factor, i.e. creativity, require comparative analysis of the projects themselves and their portfolios, in order to reach the conclusions necessary for successful management of the innovation portfolio. Due to the specificity of the innovation projects and the innovation portfolio, the methods and techniques used in managing the portfolio of classic projects do not guarantee success if applied to the portfolio of innovation projects. Noticing the differences and peculiarities of both is the first step in creating a methodology that would deliver the expected results.
|
|
|
Reference
|
1
|
Berger, P.G., Minnis, M., Sutherland, A. (2017) Commercial lending concentration and bank expertise: Evidence from borrower financial statements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 64(2-3): 253-277
|
|
Brzaković, T.D., Dinčić, D.M., Dinčić, S.M. (2015) Implementacija rizika kod evaluacije investicionih projekata. Vojno delo, vol. 67, br. 1, str. 216-231
|
5
|
Davila, T., Epstein, M.J., Shelton, R. (2006) Making innovation work: How to manage it, measure it and profit from it. Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing
|
|
Denčić-Mihajlov, K. (2020) Does sustainability matter in mergers and acquisitions?: The case of the Serbian food industry. Ekonomika poljoprivrede, vol. 67, br. 1, str. 25-36
|
|
Fernhaber, S.A., Patel, P.C. (2012) How do young firms manage product portfolio complexity?: The role of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 33(13): 1516-1539
|
|
Gracia, A., Nelson, R., Oakley, J.A., Williams, A.T. (2018) Use of ecosystems in coastal erosion management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 156: 277-289
|
|
Isin, A.A. (2018) Tax avoidance and cost of debt: The case for loan-specific risk mitigation and public debt financing. Journal of Corporate Finance, 49: 344-378
|
17
|
Jovanović, P. (2010) Upravljanje projektom. Beograd: Visoka škola za projektni menadžment
|
|
Kock, A., Georg, G.H. (2016) Antecedents to decision-making quality and agility in innovation portfolio management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6): 670-686
|
1
|
Köster, H., Pelster, M. (2017) Financial penalties and bank performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 79: 57-73
|
4
|
Kostić, R. (2020) Revizija ostvarivanja ciljeva budžetskih programa. Održivi razvoj, vol. 2, br. 1, str. 41-52
|
|
Kwak, Y.H., Anbari, F.T. (2009) Analyzing project management research: Perspectives from top management journals. International Journal of Project Management, 27(5): 435-446
|
|
Lekić, S.G., Vapa-Tankosić, J.M. (2019) Uticaj timskog rada na kreiranje inovativnih organizacija i povećanje konkurentnosti. Kultura polisa, 16(39): 505-515
|
1
|
Malbašić, S.B., Petrović, V.P., Luković, B.R. (2017) Primena projektnog menadžmenta u projektima podržanim od međunarodnih institucija - realnost i nužnost. Vojno delo, vol. 69, br. 1, str. 408-432
|
|
Marković, V., Brković, R. (2020) Javno-privatno partnerstvo u oblasti zdravstva u Republici Srbiji. Kultura polisa, 17(41): 637-652
|
|
Meifort, A. (2016) Innovation portfolio management: A synthesis and research agenda. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(2): 251-269
|
8
|
Milojević, I., Mihajlović, M. (2019) Primena metoda ocene investicionih projekata u javnom sektoru. Oditor - časopis za Menadžment, finansije i pravo, vol. 5, br. 1, str. 19-31
|
2
|
Prdić, N., Kuzman, B., Damjanović, J. (2019) Marketing research in the function of business efficiency. Ekonomika poljoprivrede, vol. 66, br. 4, str. 1039-1054
|
|
Smyth, H.J., Morris, P.W.G. (2007) An epistemological evaluation of research into projects and their management: Methodological issues. International Journal of Project Management, 25(4): 423-436
|
5
|
Stojanović, C., Stanojević, P. (2017) Ciljevi organizacionog sistema i IMS-a. Akcionarstvo, 23, (1): 5-18
|
1
|
Stošić, B. (2013) Menadžment inovacija - inovacioni projekti, modeli i metodi. Beograd: Fakultet organizacionih nauka
|
5
|
Vukša, S., Anđelić, D., Milojević, I. (2020) Analiza kao osnova održivosti poslovanja. Održivi razvoj, vol. 2, br. 1, str. 53-72
|
|
Waibel, M.W., Steenkamp, L.P., Moloko, N., Oosthuizen, G.A. (2017) Investigating the effects of smart production systems on sustainability elements. Procedia Manufacturing, 8: 731-737
|
1
|
Wang, M., Sun, X. (2019) Identity of large owner, regulation and bank risk in developing countries. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 59: 106-133
|
1
|
Wanke, P., Azad, A.K., Emrouznejad, A., Antunes, J. (2019) A dynamic network DEA model for accounting and financial indicators: A case of efficiency in MENA banking. International Review of Economics & Finance, 61: 52-68
|
2
|
Živković, A. (2019) Kvalitet upravljanja operativnim rizicima u finansijskim institucijama. Akcionarstvo, 25(1): 5-32
|
|
|
|