Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:27
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:12

Contents

article: 5 from 10  
Back back to result list
2020, vol. 74, iss. 1, pp. 47-56
Discourse of discipline: Communicative strategies in coaches' speech
aUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Sports and Physical Education
bUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Philology

emailgordana.vekaric@fsfv.bg.ac.rs
Keywords: pragmatics; sports discourse; strategic model of communication
Abstract
The great importance sport plays in modern society has resulted in analyses of many aspects of its social dynamics. The relationship of its main actors, in this case the coaches and athletes, was most often discussed form pedagogical, psychological and sociological stances and a relatively small number of studies referred to their communication, or rather its linguistic expression. The aim of this research was to describe the pragmatic mechanisms and the strategy of disciplining that coaches use when talking to athletes in two typical situations in sport: in training and at a competition. The research corpus, collected by a Discourse Completion Test, consists of authentic responses from 93 coaches of both genders. The corpus for analysis included 196 responses, categorised as clusters of speech acts which according to the strategic model could be categorised as examples of the disciplining strategy. Qualitative analysis provided an insight into the types of speech acts used in the analysed speech sequences, the functioning of politeness strategies used to mitigate the pressure on the interlocutors face, conversation implicatures and presuppositions which enable interpretation of the intended meaning that shapes coaches' discourse. The results of the analysis imply that coaches prefer using a more direct strategy in both observed situations, but also that by combining politeness strategies and indirectness they frequently disguise their communicative intentions, which most often refer to disciplining and requiring a change in the behaviour of the athlete. The conclusions we reached could be practically used in the education of coaches, by raising awareness of the importance of the aspects of linguistic production that would be appropriate in training and competitive situations, since the choice of linguistic strategies can improve the interaction of coaches and athletes.
References
Article uploaded retrospectively: references checking, normalizing and linking in progress.
Aijmer, K., & Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M. (2011). Pragmatic markers. Discursive pragmatics (Vol. 8). John Benjamins Publishing
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words? Harvard University Press
Blitvich, P. G. C., & Sifianou, M. (2019). Im/ politeness and discursive pragmatics. Journalof Pragmatics, 145: 91-101
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (Vol. 31). Ablex Pub
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dumitriu, D. (2011). The role of context in coaches' post-match discourses. Romanian Journal of Communication & Public Relations, 13(3): 43-55
Đulijanoti, R. (2008). Sport -kritička sociologija. [Sport -critical sociology. In Serbian]. Beograd:Clio
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA, US. Harvard University Press
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts. Brill
Haugh, M., & Culpeper, J. (2018). Integrative pragmatics and (im) politeness theory. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces. John Benjamins Amsterdam/Philadelphia
Kasper, G. (2006). Beyond repair: Conversation analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA review, 19(1): 83-99
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London, New York. Longman
Lorenzo, J., Navarro, R., Rivilla, J., & Lorenzo, A. (2013). The analysis of the basketball coach speech during the moments of game and pause in relation to the performance in competition. Revista de psicología del deporte, 22(1):227-230
Ostin, D. L. (1994). Kako delovati rečima. [How to act with words. In Serbian]. Novi Sad. Matica srpska
Savović, B., Ubović, M., & Radenović, S. (2018). Analysis of the motivational speech held by the National team coach before the final FIFA U-20 World Cup match. Fizička kultura. 72(1): 102-110
Serl, Dž. (1991). Govorni činovi. Ogled iz filozofije jezika. [Speech acts. An essay on the philosophy of language. In Serbian]. Beograd: Nolit
Trbojević Milošević I. (2016). Poruke neizrečenog: ključevi pragmatičke analize. [Messages of the Unspoken: The Keys to Pragmatic Analysis. In Serbin]. Beograd.Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filološki fakultet
Vekarić G. (2019). Diskurs moći u sportu: Komunikacioni modeli i strategije u interakciji trener-sportista (neobjavljena doktorska disertacija). [Discourse of power in sport: Communication models and strategies in coach-athlete interaction (unpublished doctoral dissertation. In Serbian]. Beograd. Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filološki fakultet
White, P. R. (2011). Appraisal. Discursive pragmatics (Vol. 8). John Benjamins Publishing
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics.Oxford University Press
Zienkowski, J., Östman, J. O., & Verschueren, J. (Eds.). (2011).Discursive pragmatics (Vol.8). John Benjamins Publishing
 

About

article language: Serbian, English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/fizkul2001047V
received: 04/06/2020
accepted: 18/06/2020
published online: 22/07/2020
published in SCIndeks: 20/11/2020
peer review method: double-blind
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

No related records