Akcije

Journal of Regional Security
kako citirati ovaj članak
podeli ovaj članak

Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:30
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:11

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 5  
Back povratak na rezultate
2021, vol. 16, br. 1, str. 5-26
Comparative analysis of video surveillance regulation in data protection laws in the former Yugoslav states
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
aUniverzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet organizacionih nauka + Masaryk University, Czechia
bShare Foundation, Belgrade
cUniverzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet

e-adresakrivokapic@fon.rs, danilo@sharedefense.org, jelenaa@sharedefense.org, aleksandra.stef97@gmail.com
Projekat:
This article is supported by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) project "CyberSecurity, CyberCrime and Critical Information Infrastructures Center of Excellence" (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000822)

Ključne reči: surveillance; facial recognition; privacy; regulatory framework; former Yugoslav states
Sažetak
(ne postoji na srpskom)
Video surveillance, the monitoring of a specific area, event, activity or person through an electronic device or a system for visual monitoring is already established as a central tool of public security policy. Video surveillance represents a starting point for implementing advanced technologies such as automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) and automatic facial recognition (AFR), which tend to become standards in many urban areas. Based on the increased use of video surveillance technologies, governments and private actors' capabilities in terms of monitoring of the population and potentially violating fundamental human rights are colossally increased. The article will provide a comparative analysis of national regulatory frameworks of video surveillance in public spaces in former Yugoslav states and its compliance with standards provided by new data protection regulatory framework, particularly General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The article will also give an overview of the major violations of the right to privacy by video surveillance and insight into and potential impact of new projects and technologies currently under deployment in the observed countries.
Reference
*** (2006) Security guards peeked into the locker rooms of the Emporium. Dnevnik, https://www.dnevnik.si/186409
*** (2011) The Yanks investigate 'sex at the Arena' too. Mondo, https://mondo.rs/Info/Drustvo/a205507/I-Ameri-istrazuju-seks-kod-Arene.html, Accessed 19.05.2020
*** (2019) How many CCTV Cameras are there in London. CCTV Installer, https://www.cctv.co.uk/how-many-cctv-cameras-are-therein-london/, Accessed 04.04.2020
*** (2016) Abuse of video surveillance: Criminals and police officers like Big Brother. Monitor Online, https://www.monitor.co.me/zloupoterba-video-nadzora-kriminalci-i-policajci-kao-veliki-brat, Accessed 19.05.2020
*** (2019) Major Trends in the Video Surveillance Market 2018 to 2023. u: Memoori Research, https://memoori.com/major-trends-video-surveillance-market-2018-2023, Accessed 04.04.2020
Bischoff, P. (2019) Surveillance camera statistics: which cities have the most CCTV cameras. Comparitech, https://www.comparitech.com/vpn-privacy/the-worlds-most-surveilled-cities, Accessed 04.04.2020
CAPDPFAI (2017) Conclusion on video surveillance of natural persons on their private property. Montenegro, http://www.azlp.me/docs/zastita/Stavovi%20Savjeta/Zaklju%C4%8Dak%20o%20nenadle%C5%BEnost%20, Accessed 19.05.2020
CAPDPFAI (2019) Position on recording of employees on official premises. Montenegro, http://www.azlp.me/docs/zastita/Stavovi%20 Savjeta/Stav%20Savjeta%20snimanje%20slu%C5%BEbenih%20lica.docx, Accessed 19.05.2020
CAPDPFAI (2020) Position on video surveillance in residential buildings. Montenegro, http://www.azlp.me/docs/zastita/Stavovi%20 Savjeta/video-nadzor-u-stambenim-zgradama.doc, Accessed 19.05.2020
CE (1981) Protocol amending the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data. https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016807c65 bf#globalcontainer, Accessed 19.06.2020
CPDPA (2016) Decision on surveillance system in offices of a municipality building. https://azop.hr/images/dokumenti/490/videonadzor-radno-mjesto.pdf, Accessed 19.05.2020
CPDPA (2020) Guidelines for application of the GDPR in preschool institutions. https://azop.hr/info-servis/detaljnije/primjena-opce-uredbe-o-zastiti-podataka-u-predskolskim-ustanovama, Accessed 19.05.2020
ECHR (2020) https://www.echr. coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf, Accessed 19.05.2020
ECHR (2017) Antović and Mirković v. Montenegro. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178904, Accessed 19.05.2020
EDPB (2020) Guidelines 3/2019 on processing of personal data through video devices Version 2.0, Adopted on 29 January 2020. https://edpb.europa.eu/sites/edpb/files/files/file1/edpb_guidelines_201903_video_devices.pdf, Accessed 26.10.2020
GDPR (2016) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (Gener. https://gdpr-info.eu/recitals/no-39/, Accessed 18.05.2020
Genetec (2017) What the GDPR means for Video Surveillance. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for video surveillance applications. u: Whitepaper, 12, https://resources.genetec.com/i/894178-gdpr-video, Accessed 18.05.2020
Goold, B.J. (2010) CCTV and Human Rights. u: Citizens, Cities and Video Surveillance: Towards a Democratic and Responsible Use of CCTV, Paris: European Forum for Urban Security, 27-35
Governement of UK (2019) UK Surveillance Camera Commissioner's annual report 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/surveillance-camera-commissioner-annual-report-2018-to-2019, Accessed 18.05.2020
Heilmann, E. (2011) Video surveillance and security policy in France: From regulation to widespread acceptance. Information Polity, 16(4): 369-377
Jansen, A.M., Giebels, E., van Rompay, T.J.L., Junger, M. (2018) The Influence of the Presentation of Camera Surveillance on Cheating and Pro-Social Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9: 1937-1937
MIS (2019) Data Protection Impact Assessment of video surveillance system. https://www.sharefoundation.info/wp-content/uploads/MUP-Procena-uticaja-obrade-na-zastitu-podataka-o-licnosti-koriscenjem-sistema-video-nadzora.pdf, Accessed 19.05.2020
MIS (2020) Data Protection Impact Assessment of video surveillance system II. https://www.sharefoundation.info/Documents/Procena_Uticaja%20_2_0.pdf, Accessed 19.11.2020
Niculescu-Dinca, V. (2012) Managing Suspicion and Privacy in Police Information Systems. u: Serge Gutwirth; Ronald Leenes; Paul de Hert [ur.] European Data Protection: In Good Health, Netherlands: Springer
Oulasvirta, A., Pihlajamaa, A., Perkiö, J., Debarshi, R., Taneli, V., Vainio, N., Petri, M. (2012) 'Long-term effects of ubiquitous surveillance in the home. u: UbiComp'12 -Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 41-50
Petrović, Z. (2017) Recording in progress!. https://resursi.sharefoundation.info/sr/resource/pazi-snima-se, Accessed 19.05.2020
Porter, J. (2019) The NYT investigates China's surveillance-state exports. https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/29/18522248/china-surveillance-state-exporting-ecuador-senain-ecu-911-privacy-facial-recognition-tracking, Accessed 04.04.2020
Schneier, B. (2015) Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. New York: W.W. Norton & Company
SCIPIPDP (2019) Opinion on MoI DPIA. https://praksa.poverenik.rs/predmet/detalji/FB967E2A-AE57-4B2C-8F11-D2739FD85A9B, Accessed 19.05.2020
SCIPIPDP (2019) Opinion on MoI DPIA II. https://www.sharefoundation.info/Documents/Mi%c5%a1ljenje_Poverenika_2_0.pdf, Accessed 19.11.2020
Share Foundation (2019) Huawei knows everything about cameras in Belgrade: And they are glad to share!. https://www.sharefoundation.info/en/huawei-knows-everything-about-cameras-in-belgrade-and-they-are-glad-to-share, Accessed 19.05.2020
Share Foundation (2019) Serbian government is implementing unlawful video surveillance with face recognition in Belgrade. https://www.sharefoundation.info/wp-content/uploads/Serbia-Video-Surveillance-Policy-brief-final.pdf, Accessed 19.05.2020
Share Foundation (2020) Kamere bez upotrebne dozvole/procena uticaja 2.0. https://www.sharefoundation.info/sr/kamere-bezupotrebne-dozvole-procena-uticaja-2-0/
SIC (2015) Guidelines on Video Surveillance. https://www.ip-rs.si/fileadmin/user_upload/Pdf/smernice/ Guidelines_videosurveillance_eng.pdf, Accessed May 19, 2020
SIC (2017) Information Commissioner of the Republic of Slovenia Annual Report 2017. https://www.ip-rs.si/fileadmin/user_upload/Pdf/letna_porocila_ang/Annual2017.pdf, Accessed 17.02.2021
Snow, J. (2018) Amazon's Face Recognition Falsely Matched 28 Members of Congress With Mugshots. The American Civil Liberties Union, https://www.aclu.org/blog/privacy-technology/surveillancetechnologies/amazons-face-recognition-falsely-matched-28, Accessed 18.05.2020
Stojkovski, B. (2019) Big Brother Comes to Belgrade. Foreign Policy, https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/06/18/big-brother-comesto-belgrade-huawei-china-facial-recognition-vucic/, Accessed 18.05.2020
Zuboff, S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. London: Profile Books, 8-12
 

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
DOI: 10.5937/jrs16-27170
primljen: 20.06.2020.
prihvaćen: 30.12.2020.
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 29.06.2021.
metod recenzije: dvostruko anoniman

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka