- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:6
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:4
|
|
2017, vol. 9, br. 2, str. 179-190
|
Aistheton (čulno opažanje) u vreme društveno-političke krize
Aistheton in the time of socio-political crisis
University "SS. Cyril and Methodius" in Skopje, North Macedonia
Sažetak
Glavna namera ovog rada je da predloži način razumevanja odnosa između estetike i politike u misli Žaka Rensijea kao teorijskog instrumenta za primenu u konkretnoj situaciji protesta. Nadalje, protest će se uzimati samo kao društveni događaj uživo, ali i kao telesno iskustvo sa posledicama i rezultatima koji proizlaze iz toga. Polazeći od Rancijerovog stanovišta raspodele čulnog i načina na koji predmet bez glasa mora da dostigne svoje pravo na govor, ovaj rad se bavi nekolicinom tema prema kojima se može zaključiti da samo fizičko prisustvo tokom protesta daje mogućnost subjektu da taj čin oseti razumno. Ovo je prilično različit pristup telesnog razumevanju sveta i iskustava poznatih kao odnos umetnosti i estetike, označavajući aistheton i kao istovremenog nosioca značenja političkog. Studija slučaja korišćena za ovu primenu je takozvana Obojena revolucija, i "bojenje" makedonske kapije u Skoplju, u Makedoniji.
Abstract
The main attempt in this paper is to propose the understanding of the relations between aesthetics and the politics in the thought of Jacques Rancière as a theoretical instrument for implementation in a concrete situation of the protest. From here on, the protest is taken not only as a live social event, but, even more, as a bodily experience with the consequences and results that are occurring out of it. Starting from Rancière's position of the distribution of the sensible and the ways in which the muted subject has to attain his/her right of a speech, the paper deals with several topics across which one can conclude that only the corporeal presence during the protest itself enables the subject to sense the act sensibly. This is a rather different approach to the sensible understanding of the world and the experiences known as the relation between the art and the aesthetics, addressing the aistheton as a simultaneous carrier of denotation of the political. The case study used for this implementation is the so called Colourful Revolution and the "colouring" of the Macedonia Gate in Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
|
|
|
Reference
|
2
|
Debord, G. (1994) The Society of the Spectacle. New York: Zooe Books, Trans. Donald Nicholson Smith
|
|
Ivanov, B. (2016) Komentar / Comment. [https://www.facebook.com/notes/nebojša-vilić/status-100-6832-što-mi-se-sluči-vo-četvrtokot-na-5maj-2016/10153801452193220/]
|
|
Ivanov, B. (2016) §4. bagatela (za Sašo Ordanovski) / §4. bargain (for Sašo Ordanoski). Forum analitika / Forum analytics, 12, https://www.facebook.com/bojan.ivanov/posts/10208361649745130
|
|
Lisman, K.P. (2012) Teorija na neobrazovanieto: Zabludite na opštestvoto na znaenje / Theorie der Unbildung: Die Irrtümer der Wissensgesellchaft. Skopje: Templum
|
1
|
Rancière, J. (1987/1991) The Ignorant Schoolmaster. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, Transl. Kristin Ross
|
1
|
Rancière, J. (2003/2007) The Future of the Image. London-New York: Verso, Transl. Gregory Elliott
|
|
Rancière, J. (2009/2011) The Aesthetic Unconscious. Cambridge, UK-Malden, MA: Polity Press, Transl. Debra Keates & James Swenson
|
|
Rancière, J. (2010) Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London-New York: Continuum, Edited and Translated by Steven Corcoran
|
|
Rancière, J. (1998/2011) Mute Speech: Literature, Critical Theory, and Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, Transl. by James Swenson with an Introduction by Gabriel Rockhill
|
|
Rancière, J. (2017) Modernity Revisited. u: Modern Times, Zagreb: Multimedijalni institut, pp. 58-86
|
|
Schirato, T., Webb, J. (2004) Selling the Visual. u: Reading the Visual, Crows Nest: Allen & Linwin, rr. 151-68
|
|
|
|