2014, vol. 6, br. 3, str. 238-255
|
|
Operativne razlike - Ajzenman, Tafuri i lekcija Piranezija
Operative differences: Eisenman, Tafuri and the lesson of Piranesi
University of Camerino, School of Architecture and Design, Camerino, Italy
Sažetak
Piter Ajzenman je arhitekta. Iako povezana sa interesovanjem za razne oblike, oblast njegovog delovanja obuhvata istraživanje teorijskog osnova arhitektonske discipline. Arhitektura, kao artefakt i kao projekat, može da se posmatra kao najočiglednija reprezentacija tradicionalne opozicije zapadne metafizike: odsustva i prisustva. Stoga je zadatak arhitekte, prema Ajzenmanu, da analitički interveniše u ovom dijalektičkom stanju i učini ga operativnim. Sa ove tačke gledišta, Ajzenmanov pristup disciplini - kao i čitav njegov, celoživotni arhitektonski razvojni put - posmatra se u svetlu dela Đovanija Batiste Piranezija. Otišavši dalje od kritike italijanskog istoričara arhitekture Manfreda Tafurija, Ajzenman je istraživao mogućnost novog tumačenja dijalektike između pozitivnog i negativnog, izbravši pojam zemljišta kao samog mesta ove opozicije. Berlinski Spomenik ubijenim Jevrejima Evrope nudi konačnu reprezentaciju ove dijalektike, čime otvara mogućnost daljeg, neuporedivog rada na njoj.
Abstract
Peter Eisenman is an architect. His field of action, although related to a multiform set of interests, is the investigation of the theoretical foundation of the architectural discipline. Architecture, as an artefact as well as a project, can be seen as the most evident representation of the traditional opposition of Western metaphysics: absence and presence. The task of the architect, according to Eisenman, is therefore to intervene analytically in this dialectical condition and make it operable. From this point of view, Eisenman's approach to the discipline - as well as his entire, lifelong architectural journey - is observed in the light of the work of Giovanni Battista Piranesi. Going beyond the critique made by the Italian architecture historian Manfredo Tafuri, Eisenman explored the possibility of a new interpretation of the dialectic between positive and negative, electing the notion of ground as the very place of this opposition. The Berlin Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe offers the final representation of this dialectic, opening it to a further, unparalleled working field.
|