Akcije

SAJ - Serbian Architectural Journal
kako citirati ovaj članak
podeli ovaj članak

Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: [6]
  • citati u CrossRef-u:[16]
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:3
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:2

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 4  
Back povratak na rezultate
2009, vol. 1, br. 2, str. 81-106
Rational or collaborative model of urban planning in Serbia: Institutional limitations
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet, Srbija
Projekat:
TP 163013

Sažetak
(ne postoji na srpskom)
This paper outlines the basic characteristics of the rational and collaborative model of urban planning. The situation in which urban planning in Serbia has found itself in has been analyzed. In the circumstances of the undeveloped fundamental institutions of the democratic and market-oriented society, the lack of the necessary rationality and simulation of the basic models of planning is perceived in the planning practice in Serbia. The request to explore aspects of a wider reform agenda of planning practice has been highlighted. The transformation of planning comprises a fundamental reorganization of the institutions, development of the analytical framework, change in the planning approach, i.e. the change of the planning culture. The basic position in the paper is that those changes can be realized only by building and pinpointing the system in which planning is performed, namely by defining the institutions of the socio-economic framework: the market, the private ownership and its protection, as well as the rule of law.
Reference
*** (2009) Bela knjiga Saveta stranih investitora - predlozi za poboljšanje poslovnog okruženja u Srbiji. Beograd: Savet stranih investitora
*** (2009) The global competitiveness report: 2009-2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum
Allock, J.B. (2000) Explaining Yugoslavia. London: Hurst
Amdam, J. (2002) Governance and communicative planning in practice in a welfare state: Experience from county level in Norway. u: AESOP Congress in Volos, Greece, paper
Amdam, J. (2007) The emerging Norwegian municipal structure: Alternative options and their consequences for the political and organisational reform of the local and regional levels. European Journal of Spatial Development, 1-25; (August); [Electronic version] From: http:// tilsett.hivolda.no/ja/Notat/debate_Amdam070830.pdf
Banfield, E.C. (1961) Urban government: A reader in politics and administration. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe
Batty, M. (2008) Cities as complex systems: Scaling, interactions, networks, dynamics and urban morphologies. London: Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (UCL, Working paper; CASA Working Papers (131)
Batty, M. (1995) Planning support systems and the new logic of computation. Regional Development Dialogue, 16(1): 1-17
Begović, B. (2005) Porezi na imovinu u Srbiji - postojeće stanje i predlog reforme. Finansije, vol. 60, br. 1-6, str. 37-57
Bengs, C. (2005) Planning theory for the naive?. European Journal of Spatial Development, 18: 1-10; [Electronic version].From: http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/debate050718.pdf
Bertaud, A. (2003) The spatial organization of cities: Deliberate outcome or unforeseen consequence?. u: World Development Report 2003: Sustainable Development in a Dynamic World, Washington, DC: World Bank
Bertaud, A., Renaud, B. (1997) Socialist cities without land markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 41(1): 137-151
Booher, D.E. (2004) Collaborative governance practices and democracy. National Civic Review, 93(4): 32-46
Booher, D.E., Innes, J.E. (2002) Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3): 221-236
Brody, S.D., Godschalk, D.R., Burby, R.J. (2003) Mandating citizen participation in plan making: Six strategic planning choices. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(3): 245-264
Bryson, J.M., Cunningham, G.L., Lokkesmoe, K.J. (2002) What to do when stakeholders matter: The case of problem formulation for the African American men project of Hennepin county, Minnesota. Public Administration Review, 62(5): 568-584
Connick, S., Innes, J.E. (2003) Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: Applying complexity thinking to evaluation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(2): 177-197
Čolić, R. (2009) Participacija u strateškom planiranju gradova i razvoj saznanja - primer Strateškog plana razvoja Niša. Belgrade: Faculty of Architecture, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
Fainstein, S., Fainstein, N. (1996) City planning and political values: An updated view. u: Campbell S.; Fainstein S. [ur.] Readings in Planning Theory, Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 265-287
Fainstein, S. (2000) New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4): 451-478
Flyvbjerg, B. (1998) Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Forester, J. (1987/2001) Planning in the face of conflict. u: LeGates R.T.; Stout F. [ur.] The City Reader, London: Routledge, 410-423
Forester, J. (1996) Argument, power, and passion in planning practice. u: Mandelbaum S.J.; Mazza L.; Burchell L.W. [ur.] Explorations in Planning Theory, New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University -Center for Urban Policy Research, pp. 241-262
Friedmann, J. (1987) Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Friedmann, J. (1992) Empowerment: The politics of alternative development. Cambridge, MA.-Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers
Healey, K.P.A., Motte, A., Needham, B., Eds (1997) Making strategic spatial plansinnovation in Europe. London: UCL Press
Healey, P. (2004) Creativity and urban governance. Policy Studies, 25(2): 87-102
Healey, P. (2007) Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Toward a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge/ RTPI Library Series
Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan Press
Hoch, C. (1996) A pragmatic inquiry about planning and power. u: Mandelbaum S.J.; Mazza L.; Burchell L.W. [ur.] Explorations in Planning Theory, New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University-Center for Urban Policy Research, 30-44
Hoch, C. (2007) Pragmatic communicative action theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(3): 272-283
Innes, J. (1995) Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3): 183-189
Innes, J.E., Booher, D.E. (1999) Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: Toward a theory of collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(1): 9-26
Innes, J.E., Booher, D.E. (2004) Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4): 419-436
Klosterman, R. (1985) Arguments for and against planning. Town Planning Review, 56(1): 5-20
Klosterman, R.E. (1994) Large-scale urban models: Twenty years later. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(1): 3-6
Larsen, T.K. (2003) ICT in urban planning. Aalborg University, From: http://www.akademik. unsri.ac.id/download/journal/files/msgeografi/ICT_in_UrbanPlanning_Torben_Larsen.pdf
Lazarević-Bajec, N. (1996) Strateško urbano planiranje, usmeravanje i/ili posredovanje. u: Lazarević Bajec N.; Ralević M. [ur.] Strategija urbanizacije u uslovima neizvesnosti, Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Arhitektonski fakultet, 3-28
Lazarević-Bajec, N. (2006) Integralni strateški plan opštine. u: Trifunović V.; Ralević M. [ur.] Planiranje, investicije i realizacija u tranziciji ka evropskom zakonodavstvu, Beograd: Udruženje urbanista Srbije, 157 - 167
Lazarević-Bajec, N. (2007) Tržište i planiranje - debata koja traje. u: Janić M.; Trifunović V.; Ralević M. [ur.] Investitori - investicije. Mesto i značaj u izradi strategije prostornog i urbanog razvoja Srbije, Beograd: Udruženje urbanista Srbije, 35-45
Lazarević-Bajec, N. (2009) Lokalno strateško planiranje u Srbiji - evaluacija rezultata. u: International Conference Regional Development Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance, Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam, Beograd, Proceedings, vol 2: 125-145
Lind, H. (2002) Market-oriented land-use planning: A conceptual analysis. Planning and Markets, 5: (1); [Electronic version]From: http://www-pam.usc.edu/volume5/v5i1a5s1. html#sec1
Lindblom, C.E. (2001) The market system. New Haven: Yale University Press
Lindblom, C.E. (1959) The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19(2): 79-88
Maruna, M. (2008) Primena metodologija Unified Process-a u urbanističkom planiranju. Belgrade: Faculty of Architecture, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
Meyerson, M., Banfield, E.C. (1955) Politics, planning and the public interest. New York: Free Press
Mijatović, B., Begović, B., Paunović, M. (2007) Reforma naknade za uređenje građevinskog zemljišta. Beograd: Centar za liberalno-demokratske studije, From: http://www. clds.org.rs/newsite/Reforma%20naknade%20SRPSKI.doc
Mučibabić, D. (2009) Ni presuda iz Strazbura ne ruši divlju kuću. Politika, 28. 11.; deo; Beograd
Musil, J. (2005) Why socialist and post-socialist cities are important for forward looking urban studies. u: Conference Forward. Look on Urban Science, Helsinki 26-28 May, Presented at the conference; From: http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/yhpo/kaupunki/Musil_Why_are_socialist_and_post.doc
Pasour, E. (1983) Land-use planning: Implications of the economic calculation debate. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 7(1): 127-165
Roberson, P.J., Choi, T. (2009) Self-organization and responsiveness: A simulation of collaborative governance. u: 10th National Public Management Research Conference. Oktobar 1 -3, Columbus Ohio
Sandercock, L. (1998) Towards cosmopolis: Planning for multicultural cities. New York: John Wiley & Sons
Shmueli, D.F., Kaufman, S., Ozawa, C. (2008) Mining negotiation theory for planning insights. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(3): 359-364
Tsenkova, S. (2007) Reinventing strategic planning in post-socialist cities: Experiences from Sofia. European Planning Studies, 15(3): 295-317
Vujović, S. (2004) Akteri urbanih promena u Srbiji. u: Milić A. [ur.] Društvene transformacije i strategije društvenih grupa: Svakodnevnica Srbije na početku novog milenijuma, Beograd: Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta
Weber, E.P., Khademian, A.M. (2008) Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2): 334-349
Webster, D. (1994) Effective urban management: New challenges, new responses. Regional Development Dialogue, 15(2): 7-16
 

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: neklasifikovan
DOI: 10.5937/SAJ0902081L
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 15.07.2021.

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka