- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:12
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:7
|
|
2019, vol. 58, br. 82, str. 139-164
|
Novčana kazna u savremenom krivičnom pravu
A fine in the contemporary criminal law
Sažetak
U strukturi kriminaliteta od najstarijih vremena do danas, kako u našoj, tako i u drugim zemljama, preovladava imovinski kriminalitet. Upravo zato sva krivična zakonodavstva u sistemu krivičnih sankcija propisuju različite vrste imovinskih krivičnopravnih mera kao efikasan odgovor društva prema učiniocima imovinskih krivičnih dela. U imovinske krivičnopravne mere spadaju: 1) imovinske kazne: novčana kazna i konfiskacija imovine, 2) imovinska mera bezbednosti oduzimanja predmeta, 3) mera oduzimanja imovinske koristi koja je pribavljena krivičnim delom i 4) oduzimanje imovine proistekle iz krivičnog dela. Iako spada u najstarije vrste kazni, novčanu kaznu predviđaju sva savremena krivična zakonodavstva, kao i neki međunarodni dokumenti smatrajući je adekvatnom sankcijom prema učiniocima imovinskih krivičnih dela. Upravo o pojmu, obeležjima, koncepciji, sadržini, karakteristikama, vrstama, prirodi, izricanju i izvršenju novčane kazne govori ovaj rad.
Abstract
Since times immemorial, crimes against property have always been the most frequent offences, both in the national and comparative law systems. For this reason, all criminal legislations prescribe different types of punishment and property-related criminal measures as an efficient social response to crimes against property. In the criminal law of the Republic of Serbia, the property-related penalties and measures that affect the perpetrator's property include: 1) a fine and confiscation of property (as envisaged penalties); 2) a safety measure involving the confiscation of objects, 3) the measure of confiscation of financial benefit derived from the commission of a criminal offence; and 4) the measure of confiscation of property derived from the commission of a criminal offence. A fine is one of the oldest forms of punishment, which has been envisaged in all modern criminal legislations (including the Serbian legislation) and in some international documents as the adequate sanction (penalty) against the perpetrators of property-related crimes. In this paper, the author discusses the concept, characteristics, content, types, legal nature, effects, and the process of imposing and execution of this criminal penalty. All contemporary criminal laws provide various penalties and measures for suppression and prevention of crime in general, and crimes against property in particular. Nowadays, property-related crimes are prevalent in the structure of modern criminality. Criminal sanctions depend on the specific nature and distinctive characteristics of crimes against property and their perpetrators. A fine is a specific kind of sanction that may be prescribed as a principal and/or accessory property -related penalty, which has a repressive but also highly preventive impact. In all contemporary states, crimes against property prevail in terms of the total number of committed acts, their perpetrators, consequences, the scope and intensity of social danger, recidivism, and other features. In order to suppress crime in general, and crimes against property in particular, various social (primarily state) agencies at all social levels have applied different measures, instruments and procedures. All of them may be divided into preventive and repressive ones. The Serbian criminal legislation envisages two forms of fine: a) a fine in daily amounts, and b) a fine in fixed/specified amount (the Criminal Code 2005), which may be awarded to the perpetrators of property-related crimes depending on the nature, characteristics, significance and effects of the committed criminal act.
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
*** (2001) Karistusseadustik (Luhend Kar S). RT, I, 61, 364, (dated 6. June 2001.)...... RT I 2017. 30. 3 (dated 13. Decembre 2017.)
|
|
*** (2006) Legge 10. Ottombre 1930. No. 1398. Testo coordinate ed aggiornate del Regio Decreto Legge 20. 3. 2016. No. 20 e 8. Marzo 2017. No. 24
|
|
*** (2011-2017) Narodne novine Republike Hrvatske, Br. 125.2011, 144.2012, 56.2015, 61.2015 i 101.2017
|
|
*** (2010) Sbornik nakazateljni zakoni: Nakazatelen kodeks. Sofija: Sofi-R
|
|
*** (2005-2016) Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, Br. 85.2005, 88.2005, 107.2005, 72.2009, 111.2009, 121.2012, 104.2013, 108.2014 i 94.2016
|
|
*** (2008) Službeni glasnik Republike Srbij, Br. 97
|
|
*** (2013-2016) Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, Br. 65.2013, 13.2016 i 98.2016
|
|
*** (2014) Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, Br. 55
|
|
*** (1977-1990) Službeni list SFRJ, Br. 4.1977, 36.1977, 14.1985, 74.1987, 57.1989 i 3.1990
|
|
*** (1968/2017) State Gazette, No. 26, No.85
|
|
*** (1996-2014) Služben vesnik na Republika Makedonija, Br. 37.1996, 80.1999, 4.2002, 43.2003, 19.2004, 81.2005, 60.2006, 7.2008, 114.2009, 51.2011, 135.2011, 185.2011, 142.2012, 166.2012, 55.2013, 82.2013, 14.2014, 27.2014, 28.2014, 41.2014, 115.2014 i 13
|
|
*** (2003-2018) Službeni glasnik Bosne i Hercegovine, Br. 3.2003, 32.2003, 37.2003, 54.2004, 61.2004, 30.2005, 53.2006, 55.2006, 32.2007, 8.2010, 47.2014, 22.2015 , 40.2015 i 35.2018
|
|
*** (2003-2018) Službeni list Crne Gore, Br. 70.2003, 47.2006, 40.2008, 25.2010, 32.2011, 40.2013, 14.2015, 42.2015, 58.2015, 44.2017 i 49.2018
|
|
*** (1974) Bundesgesetz: Strafgesetzbuch - StGB. BGBl, 60
|
|
*** (2008-2016) Uradni list Republike Slovenije, Br. 55.2008, 66.2008, 39.2009, 91.2011, 50.2012, 54.2015, 6.2016 i 38.2016
|
|
*** (2001) Criminal code of the Republik of Belarus. Minsk, Official text
|
|
*** (1968) Criminal code. No. VIII, No.XII-1649
|
|
*** (1998/2013) Krimallikums. Latvias Vestnesis, No. 199/200...No. 61/4867
|
|
*** (2003) Kriminalnij kodeks Ukraini: Oficijne vidanija. Kiev: Verhovna rada Ukraini
|
|
Babić, M., Marković, I. (2008) Krivično pravo - Opšti deo. Banja Luka: Pravni fakultet
|
1
|
Bogdašič, O.V. (2003) Ugolovnij kodeks Litovskoj respubliki. Sankt Peterburg: Juridičeskij centr Press
|
|
Bukljaš, I. (1960) Krivična djela, prekršaji i prijestupi. Zagreb: Narodne novine
|
3
|
Čejović, B. (1985) Krivično pravo u sudskoj praksi - opšti deo. Beograd: Naučna knjiga
|
4
|
Čejović, B. (2002) Krivično pravo - opšti deo. Beograd: Službeni list
|
|
Dalloz (2017) Code penal du France. Paris, Version consolidee au 7 aout 2017
|
|
Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag (2012) Strafgesetzbuch (StGB). Munchen, 50. Auflage
|
4
|
Đorđević, M., Đorđević, Đ. (2016) Krivično pravo. Beograd: Projuris
|
|
Eksmo (2014) Ugolovnij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii. Moskva
|
4
|
Foregger, E., Serini, E. (2004) Strafgesetzbuch. Wien: Manzsche Verlag
|
|
Geninet, B. (2012) Droit penal general. Paris: Studyrama
|
4
|
Gropp, W. (1998) Strafrecht: Allgemeiner teil. Berlin: Beck
|
2
|
Grozdanić, V., Škorić, M., Martinović, I. (2013) Kazneno pravo - Opći dio. Rijeka: Pravni fakultet
|
|
Grupa, A. (1995) Komentar KZ SR Jugoslavije. Beograd: Savremena administracija
|
4
|
Horvatić, Ž. (2003) Kazneno pravo - Opći dio. Zagreb: Pravni fakultet
|
|
Jovanović, Lj., Jelačić, M. (1997) Privredni prestupi i prekršaji. Beograd: Policijska akademija
|
|
Jovašević, D. (2000) Privredni prestupi. Beograd: Intermeks
|
3
|
Jovašević, D., Kostić, M. (2012) Politika suzbijanja kriminaliteta. Niš: Pravni fakultet
|
15
|
Jovašević, D. (2018) Krivično pravo - Opšti deo. Beograd: Dosije
|
|
Jovašević, D., Miladinović-Stefanović, D. (2018) Prekršajno pravo. Niš: Pravni fakultet
|
|
Kuznjecova, N.F., Rešetnikova, F.M. (1998) Ugolovnij kodeks Ispanii. Moskva: Zercalo
|
|
Lazarević, Lj., Vučković, B., Vučković, V. (2004) Komentar Krivičnog zakonika. Cetinje: Obod
|
|
Liberalis (2013) Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch (StGB). Zurich, 7.Auflage
|
1
|
Lolis, N., Mangakis, G. (1973) Greek Penal code. London: Sweet-Maxwel
|
2
|
Lukashov, A.I., Sarkisova, E.A. (2001) The Latvian Penal code. Saint Petersburg: Juridičeskij centr Press
|
6
|
Mrvić-Petrović, N. (2005) Krivično pravo. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
|
|
Novaković, Lj. (1986) Privredni prestupi kroz sudsku praksu. Beograd: Službeni list
|
16
|
Novoselec, P. (2004) Opći dio kaznenog prava. Zagreb: Pravni fakultet
|
4
|
Pavišić, B., Grozdanić, V., Veić, P. (2007) Komentar Kaznenog zakona. Zagreb: Narodne novine
|
|
Rarog, A.I., Esakov, G.A., Čučaev, A.I., Stepalin, V.P. (2007) Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii: Časti obšaja i osobennaja. Moskva: Prospekt
|
|
Rarog, A.I. (2008) Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii: Obšaja čast. Moskva: Prospekt
|
|
Selinšek, L. (2007) Kazensko pravo: Opšti del in osnove posebnega dela. Ljubljana: Založba GV
|
1
|
Serebrenikova, a.V., Kuznjecova, N.F. (2000) Ugolovnij kodeks Švejcarii. Moskva: Zercalo
|
4
|
Simić, I., Trešnjev, a. (2010) Krivični zakonik sa kraćim komentarom. Beograd: Ing pro
|
|
Simone (2008) Compendio di Diritto penale: Parte generale e speciale. Napoli
|
4
|
Stojanović, Z. (1991) Politika suzbijanja kriminaliteta. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet
|
80
|
Stojanović, Z. (2000) Krivično pravo - Opšti deo. Beograd: Pravna knjiga
|
1
|
Triffterer, O. (1994) Österreichisches Strafrecht: Allgemeiner Teil. Wien-New York: ETC Publishing
|
2
|
Turković, K., et al. (2013) Komentar Kaznenog zakona. Zagreb: Narodne novine
|
|
Vrhovšek, M. (1982) Sistem sankcija i uslova odgovornosti za privredne prestupe u SFRJ. Beograd: Službeni list
|
|
Zapevalov, V.V., Mancev, N.I. (2001) Ugolovnij kodeks Estonskoj respubliki. Sankt Peterburg: Juridičeskij centr Press
|
8
|
Zlatarić, B., Damaška, M. (1966) Rječnik krivičnog prava i postupka. Zagreb: Informator
|
|
|
|