Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: 0
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:12
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:8

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 14  
Back povratak na rezultate
2020, vol. 25, br. 50, str. 153-157
Grain yield potential of spring dry pea varieties
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
Naučni institut za ratarstvo i povrtarstvo, Novi Sad

e-adresabranko.milosevic83@gmail.com
Projekat:
Povećanje tržišnog značaja krmnih biljaka oplemenjivanjem i optimizacijom tehnologije proizvodnje semena (MPNTR - 31024)

Ključne reči: grašak za krmu i zrno; sorta; prinos; sadržaj sirovih proteina
Sažetak
Proteinski grašak se uglavnom koristi za ishranu životinja u našem regionu i u zemljama bivšeg SSSR-a, dok se u zemljama zapadne Evrope, Kanade, SAD-a i Bliskog istoka najviše koristi za ishranu ljudi. Tokom tri godine (2010-2012) ispitivane su komponente prinosa i prinos zrna najrasprostranjenijih sorti proteinskog graška. Najmanji broj biljaka utvrđen je kod sorte NS Junior, namenjene za kombinovanu upotrebu (65 biljaka / m2), dok su sorte Dukat i Partner imale u proseku 88 i 85 biljaka / m2. Prosečna visina stabljike za sortu NS Junior iznosila je 158 cm, a za sorte Dukat i Partner 65 i 70 cm. Sorte Dukat (4846 kg / ha) i Partner (4521 kg / ha) imale su znatno veći prinos zrna u poređenju sa sortom NS Junior (2717 kg / ha). Sadržaj sirovih proteina u zrnu bio je najveći kod sorte NS Junior (27,6%), dok su sorte Dukat i Partner imale između 23 i 25%.
Reference
Denarie, J., Debelle, F., Rosenberg, C. (1992) Signaling and Host Range Variation in Nodulation. Annual Review of Microbiology, 46(1): 497-531
Erić, P., Ćupina, B., Mihailović, V.M., Mikić, A.M. (2004) Sortna specifičnost agrotehnike stočnog graška. Zbornik radova Instituta za ratarstvo i povrtarstvo, br. 40, str. 405-417
FAOSTAT (2016) FAO Statistical Databases (FAOSTAT). Rome, http://faostat.fao.org
Guilioni, L., Wéry, J., Lecoeur, J.J. (2003) High temperature and water deficit may reduce seed number in field pea purely by decreasing plant growth rate. Functional Plant Biology, 30(11): 1151-1164
Heath, M.C., Knott, C.M., Dyer, C.J., Rogers-Lewis, D. (1991) Optimum plant densities for three semi-leafless combining pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars under contrasting field conditions. Annals of Applied Biology, 118(3): 671-688
Jovičić, D., Vujaković, M., Milošević, M., Karagić, Đ., Taški-Ajduković, K., Ignjatov, M., Mikić, A. (2010) Uticaj zaslanjenosti na klijanje i parametre porasta ponika stočnog graška (Pisum sativum L.). Ratarstvo i povrtarstvo, vol. 47, br. 2, str. 523-528
Karagić, Đ., Katić, S., Mihailović, V., Vasiljević, S., Mikić, A., Milić, D. (2008) What a seed producer needs from a plant breeder: The example of Novi Sad (NS) forage legumes varieties. u: The Grain Legumes Technology Transfer Platform (GL-TTP) Workshop (Second), Novi Sad, Serbia, 27-28 November, Book of Abstracts of, 56-57
Knott, C.M. (1987) A key for stages of development of the pea (Pisum sativum). Annals of Applied Biology, 111(1): 233-245
Littleton, E.J., Dennett, M.D., Elston, J., Monteith, J.L. (1979) The growth and development of cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) under tropical field conditions: Leaf area. Journal of Agricultural Science, 1, 93(2): 291-307
Mera, K. (1989) Plant population and spacing for conventional foliage dry peas (Pisum sativum L.) [Plaoma, Florette]. Agricultura Tecnica (Chile)
Mihailović, V., Mikić, A., Katić, S., Karagić, Đ., Milošević, B. (2010) Potencijal stočnog graška za prinos proteina krme i zrna. Ratarstvo i povrtarstvo, vol. 47, br. 1, str. 43-48
Mikić, A., Mihailović, V., Duc, G., Ćupina, B., Eteve, G., Lejeune-Henaut, I., Mikić, V. (2007) Evaluation of Winter protein pea cultivars in the conditions of Serbia. Zbornik Radova, Institut za ratarstvo i povrtarstvo Novi Sad,, vol. 44, br. 2, str. 107-112
Mikić, A., Ćupina, B., Mihailović, V., Krstić, Ð., Đorđević, V., Perić, V., Srebrić, M., Antanasović, S., Marjanović-Jeromela, A., Kobiljski, B. (2012) Forage Legume Intercropping in Temperate Regions: Models and Ideotypes. u: Lichtfouse E. [ur.] Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 11: 161-182
Moot, D.J., Mcneil, D.L. (1995) Yield components, harvest index and plant type in relation to yield differences in field pea genotypes. Euphytica, 86(1): 31-40
Poggio, S.L., Satorre, E.H., Dethiou, S., Gonzalo, G.M. (2005) Pod and seed numbers as a function of photothermal quotient during the seed set period of field pea (Pisum sativum) crops. European Journal of Agronomy, 22(1): 55-69
Pullan, M.R., Hebblethwaite, P.D. (1990) The interaction between lodging and plant population in combining peas. Annals of Applied Biology, 117(1): 119-127
Rawal, V., Navarro, D.K. (2019) The Global of Economy Pulses. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 174
Sawicki, J., Boros, L., Wawer, A. (2000) The effect of plant densities on agronomic traits of three semi-leafless pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes. Biuletyn-Instytutu Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roslin, 253-262
Saxena, M.C. (1980) Resent advances in chick pea improvement hyderabad. India: AP ICRISAT, 89-96
Spies, J.M., Warkentin, T.D., Shirtliffe, S. (2010) Basal branching in field pea cultivars and yield-density relationships. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 90(5): 679-690
Yucel, D.O. (2013) Impact of plant density on yield and yield components of pea (Pisum sativum ssp. sativum L.) cultivars. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 8(2): 169-174
 

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: neklasifikovan
DOI: 10.5937/AASer2050153M
primljen: 03.03.2020.
prihvaćen: 02.11.2020.
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 12.01.2021.
Creative Commons License 4.0

Povezani članci