Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:3
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:0

Contents

article: 3 from 13  
Back back to result list
2013, vol. 54, iss. 4, pp. 419-422
Multicriterial analisys of selection of coal with SAW and COPRAS methods
aBelgrade Land Development Public Agency, Belgrade
bDepartment of Public Health, Pancevo
Keywords: selection of coal; SAW; COPRAS
Abstract
One of the major problems in both rural and urban areas is to choose during the winter season the best alternative for heating, namely coal. In this paper we will show that the application of SA W and COPRAS methods with the appropriate criteria we can reach the best alternative. The paper presents a numerical example that shows the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed approach.
References
Memariani, A., Amini, A., Alinezhad, A. (2009) Sensitivity Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting Method (SAW): The Results of Change in the Weight of One Attribute on the Final Ranking of Alternatives. Journal of Industrial Engineering, (4): 13-18
Podvezko, V. (2011) The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS. Engineering Economics, 22(2): 134-146
Popović, G., Stanujkić, D., Stojanović, S. (2012) Selekcija investicionih projekata primenom 'COPRAS' metode za neprecizne podatke. Serbian Journal of Management, vol. 7, br. 2, str. 257-269
Popović, G., Stanujkić, D., Jovanović, R. (2012) Izbor rudnog ležišta kombinovanom primenom TOPSIS i AHP metode. Rudarski radovi, Bor, br. 3, str. 203-222
Puska, A. (2011) Uloga dinamičkih metoda ocjene efikasnosti u investicionom odlučivanju. Acta Economica, 15, str. 227-254
Srđević, B. (2005) Diskretni modeli odlučivanja u optimizaciji korišćenja kanalske mreže u Vojvodini. Letopis naučnih radova Poljoprivrednog fakulteta, vol. 29, br. 1, str. 19-30
 

About

article language: English
document type: Professional Paper
published in SCIndeks: 10/12/2013