Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: [3]
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:2
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:0

Contents

article: 2 from 2  
Back back to result list
2012, vol. 60, iss. 2, pp. 207-233
Collection of utility and other similar claims by private enforcement agents in Serbia
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law

emailbodiroga@ius.bg.ac.rs
Keywords: collection of utility (and other similar) charges; privileged enforcement creditors; legal remedies; exclusive jurisdiction of private enforcement agents
Abstract
The main focus of this paper is the special enforcement procedure with respect to collection of utility and other similar claims. The author compares this type of special proceedings to the general enforcement based on certified instruments (instrument authentique). The existence of special rules on collection of utility and similar claims is justified by the need to unburden the courts and to expedite collection of these charges. However, those rules may cause delay in enforcement proceedings. Millions of cases concerning collections of utility and similar claims in Serbia have been transferred to private enforcement agents, who have been granted exclusive jurisdiction to deal with these claims. The author inspects this novelty from the standpoint of the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia and Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and puts forward the question whether the private enforcement agent can be considered an independent tribunal or not.
References
*** (2010) Ovršni zakon. Narodne novine, br. 139
*** (2011) Zakon o izvršenju i obezbeđenju - ZIO. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 31
*** (2011) Zakon o javnom tužilaštvu. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 31
*** (2011) Zakon o komunalnim delatnostima - ZKD. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 88
*** (2011) Zakon o parničnom postupku Republike Srbije. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 72
*** (2012) Dvadeseto savetovanje sudija privrednih sudova Republike Srbije. Beograd
Antić, O.B., Balinovac, Z.M. (1996) Komentar Zakona o nasleđivanju. Beograd: Nomos
Bodiroga, N. (2006) Prigovor trećeg lica u izvršnom postupku. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 54, br. 1, str. 119-134
Burkhard, H. (2006) Die Neuorganisation des Gerichtsvollzieherswesens, Rechtsgutachten
Dika, M. (2007) Građansko ovršno pravo. Zagreb: Narodne novine
Gaul, H.F. (2011) Die erneuete gesetzesvorlage zur reform des gerichtsvollzieherswesen: Rechtspolitische notwendigkeiten, irrwege und verfassungsrechtliche schranken. ZZP, 3, 307
Grgić, A., Mataga, Z., Longar, M., Vilfan, A. (2009) Pravo na imovinu prema Evropskoj konvenciji o ljudskim pravima. Beograd: Savet Evrope, Kancelarija u Beogradu
Jakšić, A. (2006) Notar kao poverenik suda. in: Javnobeležničko pravo / priredio Dragor Hiber, 147-168
Jakšić, A. (2012) Gradjansko procesno pravo. Beograd: Pravni fakultet, Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
Jakšić, A. (2006) Komentar EKLjP. Beograd
Keča, R. (2011) Gradjansko procesno pravo. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta
Keča, R. (2012) Gradjansko procesno pravo. Beograd: Pravni fakultet
Klamaris, N. (2008) Zum Stand des griechischen Zwangsvollstreckungsrechts-eine zusammenfassende Skizze. Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess (ZZP), 4, 476
Meier, I. (2008) Die dogmatische Situation des Vollstreckungsrecht aus Sicht des schweizerischen Rechts. ZZP, 3, 333
Poznić, B., Rakić-Vodinelić, V. (1999) Građansko procesno pravo. Beograd: Savremena administracija
Rechberger, W., Oberhammer, P. (2009) Exekutionsrecht. Wien
Stanković, G., Boranijašević, V. (2012) Izvršno procesno pravo. Priština Kosovska Mitrovica: Pravni fakultet
Šobat, M., Stojšić, I. (2009) Izvršni postupak i povreda prava na pravično suđenje - evropski kontekst i novo srpsko zakonodavstvo. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 57, br. 2, str. 354-373
Zuglia, S., Triva, S. (1957) Komentar Zakona o parničnom postupku. Zagreb: Narodne novine
 

About

article language: Serbian
document type: Paper
published in SCIndeks: 22/03/2013

Related records

No related records