Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
  • citati u CrossRef-u:[1]
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:8
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:8

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 1  
Back povratak na rezultate
2019, vol. 53, br. 1, str. 17-35
Osnivanje i organizacija Evropskog javnog tužilaštva
Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Pravni fakultet

e-adresaT.Bugarski@pf.uns.ac.rs, M.Pisaric@pf.uns.ac.rs
Projekat:
Rad je nastao kao rezultat rada na Projektu: Pravna tradicija i novi pravni izazovi, u 2018, čiji nosilac je Pravni fakultet u Novom Sadu, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu

Sažetak
Budući da Evropska unija godišnje gubi značajan deo finansijskih sredstava usled krivičnog dela prevare i sličnih krivičnih dela izvršenih na štetu finansijskih interesa Unije u državama članicama, postojala je pretpostavka da je na nadnacionalnom nivou potrebno osnovati organ koji bi bio nadležan za istragu takvog nezakonitog ponašanja i i krivično gonjenje učinilaca. Iz tog razloga, Komisija Evropske unije je u julu 2013. iznela Predlog Uredbe o osnivanju Evropskog javnog tužilaštva, kao organa koji bi bio ovlašćen da istražuje krivična dela koja pogađaju finansijske interese Evropske unije i da krivično goni učinioce tih dela. Posle višegodišnjih pregovora između država članica i institucija Unije i prilagođavanja inicijalnog teksta, oktobra 2017. je usvojena Uredba kojom se osniva Evropsko javno tužilaštvo i utvrđuju njegova nadležnost i pravila rada. Predmet rada je prikaz i kritička analiza pojedinih rešenja iz ove Uredbe, da bi se sagledale mogućnosti za ostvarivanje zadataka Evropskog javnog tužilaštva u zaštiti finansijskih interesa Evropske unije.
Reference
*** (2017) Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office ( 'the EPPO' ). OJ L, 283, 31.10, 1-71, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R1939&from=EN
*** (2017) Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union' s financial interests by means of criminal law. OJ L, 198, 28.7, p. 29-41, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32017L1371&from=EN
*** (2003) Follow-up report on the Green Paper on the criminal-law protection of the financial interests of the Community and the establishment of a European Prosecutor. Brussels, COM 128 final, 19.03.2003, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52003DC0128&from=en
*** (2001) Green paper on criminal-law protection of the financial interests of the Community and the establishment of a European Prosecutor. /* COM/2001/0715 final */, 11.12, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX: 52001DC0715&from=EN
*** (2012) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Fight against Fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law. /* COM/2012/0363 final - 2012/0193 (COD) */, 11.07, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52012PC0363&from=EN
*** (2013) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust). /* COM/2013/ 0535 final - 2013/0256 (COD) */, 17.07, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52013PC0535&from=EN
*** (2016) Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions 2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/. OJ L, 135/53, 24.5, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX: 32016R0794&from =EN
*** (2018) Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust), and replacing and repealing Council Decision 2002/187/JHA. OJ L, 295, 21.11, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX: 32018R1727&from=en
*** (2012) Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. OJ C, 326, 26.10, 47-390, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT&from=EN
*** (1995) Council Act of 26 July 1995 drawing up the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 316, 27.11, 48-58, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31995F1127(03)&from=EN
*** (2002) Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime. OJ L, 63, 6.3, 1-13, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX: 32002D0187&from=en
Biehler, A., et al. (2002) Criminal-law protection of the financial interests of the Community and the establishment of a European Prosecutor: Analysis of the European Commission' s Green Paper. Luxembourg, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2003/319291/DG-4-JOIN_ET(2003)-319291_EN.pdf
Bugarski, T.D., Pisarić, M.M. (2017) Uređenje prava na odbranu u pravu Evropske unije. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, vol. 51, br. 4, str. 1409-1439
Caianiello, M. (2016) Dum Romae (et Brucsellae) Consulitur... Some Considerations on the Taricco Judgment and Its Consequences at National and European Level. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 1, 123-124
Commission of the European Communities (1999) Decision of 28 April 1999 establishing the European Antifraud Office (OLAF). OJ L, 316/20, 31.5.1999, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31999D0352&from=EN
Commission of the European Communities (2013) Commission Staff working document Executive summary of the Impact assessment: Accompanying the document Proposal for a Council Regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office. /* SWD/2013/0275 final */, 17.07, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/? uri= CELEX:52013SC0275&from=en
Commission of the European Communities (2003) Commission Staff working document Impact assessment accompanying the proposal for a Council regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor. Document SWD 274 final, http://ec.europa.eu/justice/newsroom/criminal/news/130717_en.htm
Coninsx, M. (2015) The European Commission's Legislative Proposal: An Overview of Its Main Characteristics. u: L.H. Erkelens, A.W.H. Meij, M. Pawlik [ur.] The European Public Prosecutor Office: An Extended Arm or a Two-headed Dragon?, Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 21-38
Delmas-Marty, M. (1997) Corpus Juris introducing Penal Provisions for the Purpose of the Financial Interests of the European Union. Paris
European Commission (2013) Proposal for a Council Regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor. Document COM 534 final of 17 July 2013, http://ec.europa.eu/justice/newsroom/criminal/news/130717_en.htm
Jeney, P. (2012) The future of Eurojust: Study for the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties. Justice and Home Affairs
Kessler, G. (2016) The EPPO's contribution to the protection of the EU financial interests. u: C. Nowak [ur.] The European Public Prosecutor' s Office and national authorities, Milan
Ligeti, K., Weyembergh, A. (2015) The European Public Prosecutor's Office: Certain Constitutional Issues. u: L.H. Erkelens, A.W.H. Meij, M. Pawlik [ur.] The European Public Prosecutor Office: An Extended Arm or a Two-headed Dragon?, Hague
Lohse, K. (2015) The European Public Prosecutor: Issues of Conferral, Subsidiarity and Proportionality. u: L.H. Erkelens, A.W.H. Meij, M. Pawlik [ur.] The European Public Prosecutor Office: An Extended Arm or a Two-headed Dragon?, Hague
Meij, A. (2015) Some explorations into the EPPO's Administrative structure and Judicial Review. u: L.H.Erkelens, A.W.H. Meij, M. Pawlik [ur.] The European Public Prosecutor Office: An Extended Arm or a Two-headed Dragon?, Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 101-119
Met-Domestici, A. (2016) The EPPO at the European Level: Institutional Layout and Consequences on the Links with the National Level. u: C. Nowak [ur.] The European Public Prosecutor's Office and national authorities, Milan
Pisarić, M. (2016) 'Slobodno kretanje' dokaza u krivičnom postupku. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 64, br. 2, str. 147-170
Rheinbay, S. (2014) Die Errichtung einer Europäischen Staatsanwaltschaft. Freiburg
Smulders, B. (2015) Is the Commission Proposal for a European Public Prosecutor's Office Based on a Harmonious Interpretation of Articles 85 and 86 TFEU?. u: L.H. Erkelens, A.W.H. Meij, M. Pawlik [ur.] The European Public Prosecutor Office: An Extended Arm or a Two-headed Dragon?, Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 41-51
 

O članku

jezik rada: srpski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
DOI: 10.5937/zrpfns53-20147
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 23.11.2019.
metod recenzije: dvostruko anoniman
Creative Commons License 4.0

Povezani članci

Zb Pravnog fak Novi Sad (2019)
Nadležnost evropskog javnog tužilaštva
Bugarski Tatjana D., i dr.