- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:[1]
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:31
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:12
|
|
|
2021, vol. 5, br. 2, str. 19-28
|
|
Značaj istraživanja i razvoja za inovativnu aktivnost - pregled najboljih zemalja u Evropi i svetu
The importance of research and development for innovative activity: The overview of the top countries in Europe and worldwide
Sažetak
U uslovima ekonomske globalizacije i dinamičkog okruženja, kompanije moraju kontinuirano da unapređuju i inoviraju svoje poslovanje, kako bi izbegle složenu i oštru konkurenciju i kako bi ostvarile dugoročan uspeh. Usled intezivnog dejstva tehničko-tehnološkog progresa, od uvođenja inovativnih promena u preduzeću i preduzimanja aktivnosti istraživanja i razvoja, zavisi opstanak i uspeh preduzeća na tržištu. Aktivnosti istraživanja i razvoja predstavljaju krucijalan faktor u generisanju znanja, kreiranju patenata i inovacija, kao i u rastu rentabilnosti u poslovanju savremenih preduzeća. Stoga, istraživanje i razvoj i inovacije predstavljaju kamen temeljac konkurentske prednosti. Svrha ovog rada je da ukaže na vitalan značaj koji istraživanje i razvoj ima za inovativnost, tj. za obavljanje inovativnih aktivnosti na nivou zemalja u Evropi i u svetu.
Abstract
In the conditions of economic globalization and a dynamic business environment, companies need to continuously improve and innovate their business, in order to avoid complex and fierce competition and to achieve long-term and sustainable success. Due to the intensive effect of technical and technological progress, the survival and success of the company on the market depends on the introduction of innovative changes in the company and the undertaking of research and development activities. Research and development activities are a crucial factor in generating knowledge, creating patents and innovations, as well as in the increasing of profitability in the business of modern companies. Research and development (R&D) and innovations are considered to be a cornerstone of competitive advantage. The object of this paper is to point out the vital importance that R&D has for innovativeness, i.e. for performing innovative activities at the level of European countries and worldwide.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
2   
|
Ahuja, G., Katila, R. (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 197-220
|
|
|
Bolton, P., Harris, C. (1999) Strategic experimentation. Econometrica, 67(2): 349-374
|
|
|
Bound, J., Cummins, C., Griliches, Z., Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A. (1984) Who does R&D and who patents?. u: Griliches, Z. [ur.] Patents and productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 21-54
|
|
|
Cardinal, L.B., Hatfield, D.E. (2000) Internal knowledge generation: The research laboratory and innovative productivity in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17(3-4): 247-271
|
|
|
Chiesa, V., Masella, C. (1996) Searching for an effective measure of R&D performance. Management Decision, 34(7): 49-57
|
|
|
European Patent Office (2019) Patent Index. Munich, Germany
|
|
|
EUROSTAT (2019) Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) as % GDP. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union
|
|
|
Fleming, L. (2002) Finding the organizational sources of technological breakthroughs: The story of Hewlett-Packard's thermal ink-jet. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(5): 1059-1084
|
|
|
García, F., Navas, J.E. (2007) Explaining and measuring success in new business: The effect of technological capabilities on firm results. Technovation, 27: 30-46
|
|
|
Geroski, P., Mazzucato, M. (2002) Learning and the sources of corporate growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4): 623-644
|
|
|
Griffith, R., Redding, S., Reenen, J.V. (2004) Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4): 883-895
|
|
|
Griliches, Z. (1986) Productivity, R&D, and basic research at the firm level in the 1970s. American Economic Review, 76(1): 141-154
|
|
|
Hagedoorn, J., Duysters, G. (2002) The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 14(1): 67-85
|
|
1
|
Hall, B.H., Griliches, Z., Hausman, J.A. (1986) Patents and R and D: Is there a lag?. International Economic Review, 27(2): 265-283
|
|
|
Hendry, L.C. (1998) Applying world class manufacturing to make-to-order companies: Problems and solutions. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18(11): 1086-1100
|
|
|
Hill, C.W.L., Rothaermel, F.T. (2003) The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 257-274
|
|
|
Huergo, E. (2006) The role of technological management as a source of innovation: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 35(9), 1377-1388
|
|
3 
|
Janjić, I., Rađenović, T. (2019) The importance of managing innovation in modern enterprises. Ekonomika, vol. 65, br. 3, str. 45-54
|
|
2
|
Jovanović, M., Petrović, B., Janjić, I. (2021) Key determinants of sustainable intellectual capital of enterprises. Economics of Sustainable Development, vol. 5, br. 1, str. 13-22
|
|
1
|
Katila, R., Ahuja, G. (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 1183-1194
|
|
2
|
Krstić, B., Rađenović, T. (2019) Intelektualni kapital i konkurentnost - mikro i makro aspekt. Niš: Ekonomski fakultet, ISBN 978-86-6139-191-0
|
|
3
|
Laursen, K., Salter, A. (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2): 131-150
|
|
1
|
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1): 111-125
|
|
|
Mansfield, E. (1980) Basic research and productivity increase in manufacturing. American Economic Review, 70(5): 863-873
|
|
3
|
Marković, M., Krstić, B., Rađenović, T. (2020) Circular economy and sustainable development. Economics of Sustainable Development, vol. 4, br. 1, str. 1-9
|
|
|
Mathews, J.A. (2003) Strategizing by firms in the presence of markets for resources. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(6): 1157-1193
|
|
|
Nieto, M. (2001) Bases para el estudio del proceso de innovación tecnológica en la empresa. León: Universidad de León
|
|
1
|
Pakes, A., Griliches, Z.V. (1984) Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first look. u: Griliches Z.V. [ur.] R&D, patents, and productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 55-72
|
|
|
Petković, M., Krstić, B., Rađenović, T. (2020) Accounting-based valuation methods of intangible assets: Theorethical overview. Ekonomika, vol. 66, br. 1, str. 1-12
|
|
9
|
Romer, P.M. (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): 71-102
|
|
|
Tether, B.S. (2005) The role of design in business performance: DTI think piece. University of Manchester-CRIC
|
|
|
Tsai, K.H. (2005) R&D productivity and firm size: A non-linear examination. Technovation, 25(7): 795-803
|
|
|
Wakasugi, R., Koyata, F. (1997) R&D, firm size and innovation outputs: Are Japanese firms efficient in product development?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(5): 383-392
|
|
|
WIPO (2020) Global innovation index 2020: Who will finance innovation?. Cornel: SC Johnson College of Business
|
|
|
|
|