Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: [10]
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:11
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:7

Contents

article: 4 from 4  
Back back to result list
2018, vol. 65, iss. 1, pp. 65-80
The importance of bank credits for agricultural financing in Serbia
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Economy, Serbia

emailceca@ekof.bg.ac.rs, irenaj@ekof.bg.ac.rs, zaklina@ekof.bg.ac.rs
Keywords: bank credits; subsidized loans; financing the agriculture; subsidies
Abstract
Agricultural loans present unutilized bank credit market segment in Serbia. This is not only missed profit opportunity for banks, but also serious deficiency that slows down the development of agriculture and rural areas. Paper uses FADN, NBS and bank balance sheet data in order to analyse supply and demand side of this credit market segment, with the aim to better understand the conditions for its development. Paper recommends better education of producers and lenders. Banks should better understand the requirements of agricultural producers and risks of the production to be able to create tailored credits. Insurance has very important role in specific risk hedging and can facilitate agricultural loans. There is also a need to adjust the conditions for obtaining subsidized loans, while the land size is considered as a key prerequisite for obtaining loans in the situation of large fragmentation of properties.
References
*** (2017) Subvencije u poljoprivredi - subvencionisani krediti Ministarstva poljoprivrede u saradnji sa komercijalnim bankama. http://subvencije.rs/krediti/subvencionisani-krediti-ministarstva-poljoprivrede/subvencionisanikrediti-ministarstva-poljoprivredesumarstva-vodoprivrede/ (22.12.2017)
*** NBS statistics. www.nbs.rs
Agroklub (2017) Budžet 2018 - kako će se trošiti novac?. https://www.agroklub.rs/poljoprivredne-vesti/budzet-2018-kako-ce-se-trositi-novac/37803/ (24.12.2017)
Cvijanović, D., Subić, J., Paraušić, V. (2014) Poljoprivredna gazdinstva prema ekonomskoj veličini i tipu proizvodnje u Republici Srbiji, Popis poljoprivrede- Poljoprivreda u Republici Srbiji 2012. Beograd: Republički zavod za statistiku
Komercijalna banka (2016) Annual report. Belgrade, http://www.kombank.com/pdf/godisnji_2016.pdf, (18.12.2017)
Manić, E., Popović, S., Molnar, D. (2013) Regional Disparities and Regional Development: The Case of Serbia. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft, 154: 191-211
Manić, E., Popović, S., Stojanović, Ž. (2017) Rural Space Development in Post-transition Countries: The Case of Serbia. ISR-Forschungsberichte, 43: 11-30
Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede (2015) 175 miliona evra iz IPARD programa. http://www.minpolj.gov.rs/175-miliona-evra-izipard- programa/ (24.12.2017)
Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede (2017) Budžet za 2017. godinu veći za 3, 2 milijarde dinara. http://www.minpolj.gov.rs/budzetza-2017-godinu-veci-za-32-milijarde-dinara/ (23.12.2017)
Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede (2015) Farm accountancy data network: Database
NBS (2017) Bankarski sektor u Srbiji - izveštaj za IV tromesečje 2016. godine. Sektor za kontrolu poslovanja banaka, jun, http://www.nbs.rs/internet/latinica/55/55_4/kvartalni_izvestaj_IV_16.pdf (16.12.2017)
Sedlak, O., Jovin, S., Pejanović, R., Ćirić, Z., Eremić-Đođić, J. (2016) Access to finance for micro, small and medium business units in Serbian agribusiness. Ekonomika poljoprivrede, vol. 63, br. 4, str. 1219-1235
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2017) http://www.stat.gov.rs/WebSite/public/ReportView.aspx (12.12.2017)
USAID Enabling Project (2013) Agricultural finance in Serbia: Status and recommendations. http://www.bep.rs/baza_znanja/documents/commodity-exchange/Agricultural%20Finance%20in%20Serbia.pdf (11.12.2017)
Vučković, B., Veselinović, B., Drobnjaković, M. (2017) Financing of permanent working capital in agriculture. Ekonomika poljoprivrede, vol. 64, br. 3, str. 1065-1080
 

About

article language: English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/ekoPolj1801065P
published in SCIndeks: 31/05/2018
peer review method: double-blind
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

No related records