• citations in SCIndeks: [1]
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:14
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:9


article: 2 from 3  
Back back to result list
2015, vol. 57, iss. 2, pp. 122-134
The utility of involving citizens in the complaint procedure
During the performance of increasingly complex and demanding security tasks, police enforce various powers in different environments and are influenced by many factors which facilitate or hinder their implementation. Powers are exclusively established to preserve and protect human rights and freedoms, but there are serious violations of human rights and freedoms, which occur when there are irreparable consequences. One of the modalities to increase the level of legality, professionalism and accountability of police officers is control. The focus of this work is the internal control of the police embodied in police oversight resolving complaints The goal is to highlight the need for oversight of the police as the government authority that has significant powers, which may violate the rights and freedoms of citizens. Another aim is to give an overview of laws and regulations that directly govern the area in question pointing out to certain specific features of conducting proceedings initiated by citizen complaints and establish whether the appellate procedure is expedient from to position of the citizens. If we tried to perform an evaluation of the complaint procedure, a place for the glorification would certainly be, because the procedure is based on the legislative grounds i.e.. the Police Act, the closer it is prescribed properly and precise by the instruction on the application of the rules of appellate procedure, as citizens are much easier implementation of constitutionally guaranteed rights, the right to submit petitions and other proposals and the whole thing has a public connotation. Appellate procedures are strictly formalized and determined from the time of filing or receiving the complaint, pending a decision on the merits. On the other hand, the regulations governing and defining the implementation procedures are transparent; there is a two-instance proceedings and the presence of the public, as well as the active participation of the complainant. However, despite the active participation in the appeal, the citizens do not achieve their legal interests irrespective of the validity and merits of the complaint filled. Except for general deterrence, the outcome of the procedure has no effect, and relevance to citizens whose rights and freedoms are violated. The realization of their rights, as well as compensation for the costs incurred by participating in the appellate proceedings, must be made in regular court proceedings, which does not rely on the already implemented process, but again requires his active participation.
*** (2005/2014) Krivični zakonik. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 85/2005, 88/2005, 107/2005, 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012, 104/2013 i 108/2014
*** (2006) Pravilnik o postupku rešavanja pritužbi. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 54
*** (2006) Uredba o disciplinskoj odgovornosti u MUP-u. Službeni glasnik PC, br. 08
*** (2006) Ustav Republike Srbije. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 98
*** (2011/2014) Zakonik o krivičnom postupku. Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, br. 72/2011, 101/2011, 121/2012, 32/2013, 45/2013 i 55/2014
*** (2005/2014) Zakon o državnoj upravi. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 79/2005, 101/2007, 95/2010 i 99/2014
*** (1997/2010) Zakon o opštem upravnom postupku. Službeni list Savezne Republike Jugoslavije, br. 33/1997, 31/2001, Službeni glasnik PC, br. 30/2010
*** (2011/2014) Zakon o parničnom postupku. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 72/2011, 49/2013 - Odluka US, 74/2013 - Odluka US i 55/2014
*** (2005/2015) Zakon o policiji. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 101/2005, 63/2009 - Odluka US, 92/2011 i 64/2015
Bikarević, D. (2010) Problemi i postupak kontrole rada policije rešavanjem pritužbi. Novi Sad, diplomski-master rad
Bikarević, D. (2015) Postupak rešavanja pritužbi u Ministarstvu unutrašnjih poslova. Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, vol. 87, br. 3, str. 164-182
Božović, M. (2012) Međunarodni standardi policijskog postupanja i primene policijskih ovlašćenja u Republici Srbiji. Bezbednost, Beograd, vol. 54, br. 3, str. 335-349
Kesić, Z. (2011) Prekoračenje i zloupotreba policijskih ovlašćenja u senci diskrecione moći policije. Bezbednost, Beograd, vol. 53, br. 2, str. 66-89
Kesić, Z. (2012) Teorijsko definisanje korupcije u policiji. Bezbednost, Beograd, vol. 54, br. 2, str. 134-150
Marković, S.M. (2014) Praktični aspekti primene nekih policijskih ovlašćenja i obavljanja poslova. Bezbednost, Beograd, vol. 56, br. 1, str. 104-125
Miletić, S. (2009) Komentar Zakona o policiji. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
Miletić, S., Jugović, S. (2009) Pravo unutrašnjih poslova. Beograd: Kriminalističko-policijska akademija
Milidragović, D., Milić, N. (2011) Neposredna opasnost po život kao poseban uslov za upotrebu vatrenog oružja. Bezbednost, Beograd, vol. 53, br. 2, str. 197-218
Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova (2006) Instrukcija o primeni pravila pritužbenog postupka. Beograd
Nikač, Ž. (2013) Izmene i dopune Zakona o policiji Republike Srbije - kritički osvrt na važnije novele. Bezbednost, Beograd, vol. 55, br. 2, str. 180-195
Simić, B., Nikač, Ž. (2012) Kontrola policije u Republici Srbiji u funkciji zaštite ljudskih prava. Kultura polisa, 9 (2), str. 309
Simović, D., Zekavica, P. (2012) Policija i ljudska prava. Beograd: Kriminalističko-policijska akademija
Vasiljević, D. (2008) Pravna država i savremena uprava. Nauka, bezbednost, policija, vol. 13, br. 2, str. 21-38
Vasiljević, D. (2013) Francuski sistem sudske kontrole uprave i njegov doprinos izgradnji demokratske pravne države. Nauka, bezbednost, policija, vol. 18, br. 2, str. 61-69
Vasiljević, D. (2011) Funkcije policije i njena ovlašćenja da preduzme upravne radnje. Nauka, bezbednost, policija, vol. 16, br. 2, str. 29-38
Vujasinović, Đ. (2013) Komisija za rešavanje pritužbi građana na pad policijskih službenika - problemi i ograničenja. Novi Sad, diplomski-master rad
Živković, M. (2010) Pravna država i moderan pravni sistem. Nauka, bezbednost, policija, vol. 15, br. 1, str. 1-15


article language: Serbian
document type: Review Paper
DOI: 10.5937/bezbednost1502122B
published in SCIndeks: 16/01/2016

Related records

No related records