• citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:5
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:3


article: 1 from 3  
Back back to result list
2021, vol. 69, iss. 3, pp. 541-562
Transformation of the polis and two sophistic reflections: Protagoras and Callicles
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Political Sciences
Keywords: Protagoras; Callicles; virtue; law; nature
By comparing Protagoras' and Callicles' arguments, the author outlines two accounts that respond to the questions raised by the changing social realities of 5th century BC Athens. The two sophists' views are comprised of several complementary elements: 1) viewing humans as beings driven by pursuit of pleasures and avoidance of pain; 2) distinguishing law from nature; 3) views of morality as grounded in nature; 4) demanding that laws be adjusted to natural standards of justice and good life. A key point of disagreement can be found in Protagoras' myth, where he distinguishes between natural principles that apply only to humans and those that pertain to the rest of the natural world. This draws an important distinction between Protagoras and Callicles: Protagoras' democratic man seeking to influence the outcomes of collective political decision-making in an egalitarian community is contrasted by Callicles' aristocrat who is meant to freely govern over their inferiors.
Avramović, D.S., Jovanov, I.D. (2020) Relativizacija pravde kroz retoriku - Platonov dijalog 'Gorgija' kao paradigma. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, vol. 54, br. 1, str. 245-265
Barney, R. (2017) Callicles and Thrasymachus. in: Zalta Edward N. [ed.] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford: Stanford University
Berman, S. (1991) Socrates and Callicles on Pleasure. Phronesis, 36(2): 117-140
Blundell, M.W. (1989) Helping Friends and Harming Enemies: A Study in Sophocles and Greek Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bonazzi, M. (2000) Protagoras. in: Zalta Edward N. [ed.] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford: Stanford University
Cooper, J.M. (1999) Reason and Emotion. Princeton: Princeton University Press
de Romilly, J. (1992) The Great Sophists in Periclean Athens. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Decleva, C.F. (1999) Protagoras and Antiphon: Sophistic Debates on Justice. in: Long A. A. [ed.] The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 311-331
Đurić, M. (1958) Ideja prirodnog prava kod grčkih sofista. Beograd: Savez udruženja pravnika Jugoslavije
Đurić, M. (1955) Sofisti i njihov istorijski značaj. Beograd: Narodna knjiga
Fleming, D. (2002) The streets of Thurii: Discourse, democracy, and design in the classical polis. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 32(3): 5-32
Guthrie, W.K.C. (1971) A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 3, the Fifth Century Enlightenment, Part 1, the Sophists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Harris, E.M. (2006) Law and Society in Ancient Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hussey, E. (2021) Protagoras on Political Technê. in: Johansen Thomas Kjeller [ed.] Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15-38
Irani, T. (2017) Plato on the Value of Philosophy: The Art of Argument in the Gorgias and Phaedrus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Jamblihov, A. (2018) Anonim Jamblihov. in: Sofisti, Beograd: Službeni glasnik, 140-151, 2, prev. i prir. Aleksandra Zdravković-Zistakis
Jordović, I. (2009) Istorijski koreni učenja o pravu jačeg. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 57, br. 2, str. 212-228
Kaluđerović, Ž., Donev, D. (2016) Kaliklova pleoneksija. Kom : časopis za religijske nauke, vol. 5, br. 1, str. 105-122
Kerferd, G.B. (1953) Protagoras' Doctrine of Justice and Virtue in the 'Protagoras' of Plato. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 73: 42-45
Kerferd, G.B. (1981) The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Klosko, G. (1984) The Refutation of Callicles in Plato's Gorgias. Greece and Rome, 31(2): 126-139
Long, A.G. (2017) Socrates and Sophists. in: Golob Sacha; Timmermann Jens [ed.] The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15-27
Nathan, A.R. (2017) Protagoras' Great Speech. Classical Quarterly, 67(2): 380-399
Nill, M. (1985) Morality and self-interest in Protagoras, Antiphon, and Democritus. Leiden: Brill
Notomi, N. (2013) A Protagonist of the Sophistic Movement: Protagoras in Historiography. in: van Ophuijsen Johannes M.; van Raalte Marlein; Stork Peter [ed.] Protagoras of Abdera: The Man, His Measure, Leiden: Brill, 11-36
Phillips, D.D. (2008) Avengers of Blood: Homicide in Athenian Law and Custom From Draco to Demosthenes. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag
Platon (1968) Gorgija. in: Protagora, Gorgija, Beograd: Kultura, 1-68, prev. Mirjana Drašković, Albin Vilhar
Platon (1968) Protagora. in: Protagora, Gorgija, Albin Vilhar. Beograd: Kultura, 69-193, prev. Mirjana Drašković, Albin Vilhar
Platon (2000) Teetet. in: Kratil, Teetet, Sofist, Državnik, Beograd: Plato, 83-184, prev. Milivoj Sironić
Platon (2002) Država. Beograd: BIGZ, prev. Albin Vilhar i Branko Pavlović
Raaflaub, K.A. (2007) Poets, Lawgivers, and the Beginnings of Political Reflection in Archaic Greece. in: Rowe Christopher ;Schofield Malcolm [ed.] The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23-59
Shortridge, A. (2007) Law and Nature in Protagoras' Great Speech. Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought, 24(1): 12-25
Stauffer, D. (2002) Socrates and Callicles: A Reading of Plato'sGorgias. Review of Politics, 64(4): 627-658
Woodruff, P. (1999) Rhetoric and Relativism: Protagoras and Gorgias. in: Long A. A. [ed.] The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 290-310
Woodruff, P. (2013) Euboulia As the Skill Protagoras Taught. in: van Ophuijsen Johannes M. ; van Raalte Marlein; Stork Peter [ed.] Protagoras of Abdera: The Man, His Measure, Leiden: Brill, 179-194
Zdravković-Zistakis, A. (2017) Sofisti. Beograd: Službeni glasnik, 1


article language: Serbian
document type: Paper
DOI: 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21303A
received: 31/07/2021
accepted: 30/08/2021
published in SCIndeks: 25/09/2021
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

No related records