kako citirati ovaj članak
podeli ovaj članak


  • citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
  • citati u CrossRef-u:0
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:12
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:0


članak: 2 od 2  
Back povratak na rezultate
2011, br. 25, str. 7-13
The territorial approach to EU cohesion policy: Current issues and evidence from Greece
(naslov ne postoji na srpskom)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Spatial Planning and Development, Veria, Greece

Ključne reči: cohesion policy; territorial cohesion; territorial dimension; community strategic guidelines; regional development planning; Greek regional policy
(ne postoji na srpskom)
The importance attributed to the territorial dimension of the European Union cohesion policy steadily influences its successive reforms and adaptations, while in recent years there has been an evolution in the way this particular dimension of cohesion policy is perceived. Important evidence for this is the way in which the Community Strategic Guidelines on cohesion 2007-13 take account of the territorial dimension of cohesion policy. This paper discusses the territorial approach to cohesion policy in relation to both policy and practice. Specifically, it examines the territorial dimension of regional development planning in Greece as it has emerged in the relevant official documents, namely the successive three Community Support Frameworks since 1989 and the National Strategic Reference Framework for the current 2007-13 period. The territorial dimension of the organization of the planning system is also considered in an effort to understand limitations and prospects, in light of the importance of the territorial approach to cohesion policy post-2013.
*** (1994) Community support framework 1994-1999 Greece. Commission of the European Communities (CEC), official document
*** (2009) Executive summary of the strategic report NSRF 2009. General Secretariat for Investments and Development Greece (GSID), www.espa.gr/elibrary/100323_Executive Summary_en.pdf 5/6/2010
*** (2007) Territorial agenda of the European Union: Toward a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. u: Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion in on 24/25 May 2007, Leipzig
*** (2004) Community support framework 2000-2006 for Greece. Ministry of Economy and Finance Greece, official document
*** (2007) National strategic reference framework 2007-2013. Ministry of Economy and Finance Greece, www.espa.gr/elibrary/NSRF%20document_english.pdf 5/6/2010
*** (1999) Regional development plan for Greece 2000-2006 regional section. u: Greek, Ministry of National Economy Greece, official document
Albrechts, L. (2001) In pursuit of new approaches to strategic spatial planning: A European perspective. International Planning Studies, 6(3): 293
Andreou, G. (2006) EU Cohesion Policy in Greece: Patterns of Governance and Europeanization. South European Society and Politics, 11(2): 241-259
Andreou, G. (2010) The domestic effects of EU cohesion policy in Greece: islands of Europeanization in a sea of traditional practices. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 10(1): 13-27
Andrikopoulou, E., Kafkalas, G. (2004) Greek regional policy and the process of Europeanization, 1961-2000. u: Dimitrakopoulos D., Passas A. [ur.] Greece in the European Union, London: Routledge, str. 35-47
Andrikopoulou, E., Kafkalas, G. (2008) Building the conceptual content of 'territorial cohesion. u: International and European Policy, Special Issue on 'The Reformative Treaty and Territorial Cohesion', Athens: Papazisis, 195-263 (in Greek)
Barca, F. (2009) An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent report prepared at the request of Danuta Hubner, Commissioner for Regional Policy, http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/policy/future/pdf/report_barca_ v0306.pdf
Begg, I. (2010) Cohesion or Confusion: A Policy Searching for Objectives. Journal of European Integration, 32(1): 77-96
Bengs, C. (2002) Let science have relevance!. European Journal of Spatial Development, No 1, Electronic Journal, Nordregio, www.nordregio.se/ejsd/editorials.html last accessed 31/10/2010
Castree, N. (2002) From spaces of antagonism to spaces of engagement. u: Brown A., Fleetwood S., Roberts J.M. [ur.] Critical realism and marxism, London: Routlege, str. 187-214
Chorianopoulos, I. (2010) Uneven development and neo-corporatism in the Greek urban realm. Análise Social, vol. XLV(197), str. 739-756, www.scielo.oces.mctes.pt/pdf/aso/n197/n 197a07.pdf 31/10/2010
Coccossis, H., Economou, D., Petrakos, G. (2005) The ESDP relevance to a distant partner: Greece. European Planning Studies, vol. 13.No 2, str. 253-264
Commission of the European Communities (2005) Cohesion Policy in support of growth and jobs: Community strategic guidelines, 2007-2013. COM, 0299, http://ec.europa.eu
Commission of the European Communities (2009) Sixth progress report on economic and social cohesion. u: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Brussels, COM(2009) 295, http://ec.europa.eu
Commission of the European Communities (C.E.C.) (1991) Europe 2000: Outlook for the development of the communitys territory. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
Davoudi, S. (2005) Transnational co-operation and its contribution to territorial cohesion. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, Heft 11/12. 2005 str. 683-689, www.architektur-baukultur.de/nn_25836/BBSR/EN/Publications/IzR/2005/DL__Heft11__12__Davoudi,templateId=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf/DL_Heft11_12_Davoudi.pdf 23/6/201
Davoudi, S. (2005) Understanding Territorial Cohesion. u: Planning, Practice and Research, Vol.20, Nr.4, pp.433-441
European Commission (1990) Community Support Framework 1989- 1993 Greece. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
European Commission (1994) Europe 2000+: Cooperation for European territorial development. Luxembourg
European Commission (1997) The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies: Regional development studies - regional policy and cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
European Commission - Committee on Spatial Development (1999) European spatial development perspective (ESDP): Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the EU. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
European Commission (2001) Second report on economic and social cohesion. Unity, solidarity, diversity for Europe, its people and its territory. http://ec.europa.eu/
European Commission (2004) Third report on economic and social cohesion. A new partnership for cohesion, convergence competitiveness cooperation
European Commission (2007) Growing regions, growing Europe: Fourth report on economic and social cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
Faludi, A. (2010) The process architecture of EU territorial cohesion policy. European Journal of Spatial Development, refereed article, Aug. 2010, No 39, http://www.nordregio.se/ EJSD/refereed39.pdf (last accessed 23/6/ 2011
Faludi, A. (2002) Positioning European Spatial Planning. European Planning Studies, 10(7): 897-909
Faludi, A. (2004) The European spatial development perspective and North-West Europe: Application and the future1. European Planning Studies, 12(3): 391-408
Faludi, A. (2006) From European spatial development to territorial cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 40(6): 667-678
Foutakis, D., Thoidou, E. (2009) Towards re-reforming the EU cohesion policy: Key issues in the debate and some thoughts on peripheral regions. Spatium, br. 21, str. 11-18
Getimis, P., Paraskevopoulos, C. (2002) Europeanization of regional policy and institution-building in Greece: A neglected aspect of policy evaluation?. u: Regional studies association conference on evaluation and EU regional policy: New questions and new challenges, Aix En Provence, 31/6/2002, str. 5-1, www.uehr.panteion.gr/adapt/GetimisParaskevopoulos_2002.pdf (last accessed 20/6/2011)
Getimis, P., Grigoriadou, D. (2004) The Europeanization of urban governance in Greece: a dynamic and contradictory process. International Planning Studies, 9(1): 5
Getimis, P., Kafkalas, G. (1992) Local development and forms of regulation: Fragmentation and hierarchy of spatial policies in Greece. Geoforum, 23(1): 73-83
Getimis, P. (2003) Improving European Union regional policy by learning from the past in view of enlargement. European Planning Studies, 11(1): 77
Goulet, R. (2008) Green paper on territorial cohesion: The way ahead European Union regional policy Inforegio Panorama. No 28, http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/panorama/pdf/mag28/mag28_en.pdf
Healey, P. (2004) The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 28. No 1., 45-67
Hubner, D. (2008) Foreword, in European Commission, growing regions, growing Europe: Fifth progress report on economic and social cohesion. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/interim5/com_2 008_371_en.pdf last accessed 11/10/2009
Kafkalas, G. (2004) The scientific field of spatial development: Evolution and basic components. u: Kafkalas G. [ur.] Spatial development issues: Theoretical approaches and policies, Athens: Kritiki, str. 15-37
Konsolas, N., Papadaskalopoulos, A., Plaskovitis, I. (2002) Regional development in Greece. Berlin: Springer Verlag
Kunzmann, K. (2006) Europeanization of spatial planning. u: Regional Development and Spatial Planning in Enlarged European Union, Urban and Regional Planning and Development Series, Aschgate Publishing Ltd, pp. 43-64
Mirwaldt, K., Mcmaster, I., Bachtler, J. (2009) Reconsidering cohesion policy: The contested debate on territorial cohesion. European Policy Research Paper, No 66, www.eprc.strath.ac.uk/eprc/documents/PDF_files/EPRP_66_Reconsidering_Cohesion_Policy.pdf 20/6/2011
Molle, W. (2006) EU cohesion policies: Adequate constitutional foundations and regulatory and financial constructions: Need for further optimization. u: European economy workshop (IV), Milan, University of Milan, www.conomia.unimi.it/uploads/wp/wp242.pdf 5/6/2010
Nadin, V. (2007) The emergence of the spatial planning approach in England. Planning Practice and Research, 22(1): 43-62
Naylon, I., Schneidewind, P., Tatzberger, G. (2007) Follow-up of the territorial agenda and the Leipzig charter: Towards a European action programme for spatial development and territorial cohesion. European Parliament, DG for Internal Policies of the Union, Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies
Njegovan, Z. (2008) Experiences and dilemmas of strategic action planning implementation on the local level. Spatium, br. 17-18, str. 27-30
Petrakos, G., Psycharis, Y. (2006) Regional policy in Greece: An overview and the recent policy change. u: Congress of the European Regional Science Association (LXVI) 'Enlargement Southern Europe and the Mediterranean', www-sre.wuwien.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa06/papers/948.pdf 20/6/2011
Pike, A., Rodriguez-Pose, A., Tomaney, J. (2006) Local and regional development. London: Routledge
Plaskovitis, I. (2008) Change in regional Policy Priorities, Objectives and Instruments in Greece: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Programmes. u: Coccossis H., Y. Psycharis [ur.] Regional Analysis and Policy. The Greek experience, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag
Stein, A. (2010) Territorial cohesion in the context of interregional and transnational cooperation. European Spatial Research and Policy, 17(1): 5-22
The Council of the European Union (2006) Council Decision of 6 October 2006 on Community Strategic Guidelines on Cohesion (206/702/EC). http://ec.europa.eu
Thoidou, E. (2009) Spatial dimensions of regional development programmes in Greece since 1989: Central or local policies. u: Pan-hellenic conference on urban and regional planning and development (II), proc., Volos: University of Thessaly Press, str. 489-496
Vasilevska, L., Vasić, M. (2009) Strategic planning as a regional development policy mechanism: European context. Spatium, br. 21, str. 19-26

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: naučna polemika
DOI: 10.2298/SPAT1125007T
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 29.11.2011.

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka