- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:15
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:3
|
|
|
2016, vol. 10, br. 1, str. 239-255
|
|
Pregled indeksa konkurentnosti sa osvrtom na vanredne situacije
Influence of emergency situations on the business competitiveness
aUniverzitet u Novom Sadu, Fakultet tehničkih nauka, Srbija + Univerzitet Educons, Fakultet poslovne ekonomije, Sremska Kamenica, Srbija bUniverzitet Educons, Fakultet za primenjenu bezbednost, Sremska Kamenica, Srbija
e-adresa: andrea.katic@uns.ac.rs, sdomazetns@gmail.com
Projekat: Evropske integracije i društveno-ekonomske promene privrede Srbije na putu ka EU (MPNTR - 47009)
'Vanredne situacije kao faktor ugrožavanja konkurentnosti vojvođanske privrede', finansiran od strane Pokrajinskog sekretarijata za nauku i tehnološki razvoj (Broj projekta 114-451-582/2015)
Sažetak
Uticaj vanrednih situacija na poslovanje privrednih subjekata je tema o kojoj se u Republici Srbiji poklanja vrlo mala pažnja, za razliku od razvijenih evropskih zemalja. Vanredne situacije mogu prouzrokovati ogromne štete privrednim subjektima, ali i značajne štete po životnu sredinu. Samim tim, može doći do narušavanja njihove konkurentske pozicije na tržištu, s obzirom na otežano poslovanje, odnosno nemogućnost obezbeđenja kontinuiteta poslovanja. Oblasti koje kompanije treba da razmotre u ekstremnim vreme nekim događajima obuhvataju njihova tržišta, prostorije, ljude, informacione tehnologije i bezbednost podataka, dobavljače, logistiku i isporuku, proizvole, procese, skladišta i sirovine. Zaštita privrednih aktivnosti Srbije (odnosno AP Vojvodine) u vanrednim situacijama, bez obzira na mnoge inicijative, nije u dovoljnoj meri prepoznata kao interdisciplinaran problem, čije rešenje zahteva pažljivu analizu i primenu adekvatnih mera u praksi. Stoga je neophodno pažljivo analizirati ključne faktore rizika po poslovno okruženje, odnosno istražiti uticaj koji vanredne situacije imaju na konkurentnost privrede. Pregledom literature, u radu, ustanovljeno je da postoji veći broj studija koji sadrže pojedine indikatore povezane sa vanrednim situacijama. Razmotreni su rezultati glavnih studija u svetu koje prema izabranim kriterijumima mere uticaj vanrednih situacija na privredne aktivnosti. Izvučeni su zaključci i rezultati najrelevantnijih istraživanja u okviru ove tematike, na osnovu kojih je moguće dati pre poruke i smernice privrednim subjektima Srbije (odnosno AP Vojvodine) vezano za ponašanje u vanrednim situacijama.
Abstract
The impact of emergencies on the business of economic entities is a topic with very little attention in the Republic of Serbia in contrast to developed European countries. Emergency situations can cause enormous damage to businesses, as well as significant damage to the environment. Consequently, it can cause distortion of their competitive position on the market, difficulties on the business, or the inability to ensure business continuity. Areas that companies need to consider in extreme weather events, including their markets, are facilities, people, information technology and data security, suppliers, logistics and delivery, products, processes, warehouses and raw materials. Protection of economic activities of Serbia (and AP Vojvodina) in emergency situations, regardless of the many initiatives, is not sufficiently recognized as an interdisciplinary problem, whose solution requires careful analysis and application of appropriate measures in practice. Therefore, it is necessary to carefully analyze the key risk factors to the business environment, and to explore what kind of impact emergency situations have on the competitiveness of the economy. In a review of literature, in the paper, it was found that there are a number of studies that contain certain indicators related to emergency situations. The results of major studies in the world which, according to selected criteria, measure the impact of emergencies on economic activity are discussed. The conclusions are drawn and the results of the most relevant research in the context of these topics are given. On its basis it is possible to provide recommendations and guidance to enterprises in Serbia (and AP Vojvodina) related to the behavior in emergency situations.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
1  
|
Alexander, D. (2006) Globalization of disasters: trends, problems, and dilemmas. Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 59; No. 2, pp. 1-22
|
|
|
Antunes, R., Gonzalez, V. (2015) A Production Model for Construction: A Theoretical Framework. Buildings, 5(1): 209-228
|
|
|
Aon Global Risk Consulting (2015) Global risk management survey 2015. http://www.aon.com/2015GlobalRisk
|
|
|
Association for Financial Professionals (2015) AFP risk survey. 15.4.2016., http://www.afponline.org/risksurvey/
|
|
1
|
Briceno, S. (2004) Global challenges in disaster reduction. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, Vol. 19; No. 1, pp. 3-5
|
|
|
Domazet, S., Radović, V. (2016) Izazovi implementacije savremeiih staidarda u aktivnostima organizacija u cilju nastavka poslovanja. Ecologica, u stampi
|
|
1 
|
Domazet, S. (2015) Pravna regulativa u vezi sa vanrednim situacijama u AP Vojvodini. Poslovna ekonomija, vol. 9, br. 2, str. 413-432
|
|
|
Economist Intelligence Unit (2013) Hot spots 2025: Benchmarking the future competitiveness of cities. 15.4.2016., http://www.citigroup.com/citi/citiforcities/pdfs/hotspots2025.pdf
|
|
|
European Commission (2000) European Competitiveness Report
|
|
|
European Commission (2014) Serbia Floods. dostupno 15. 4. 2016. na http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/press_comer/floods/20140715-serbia-ma-report.pdf
|
|
|
Flanagan, R., Norman, G. (1993) Risk management and construction. London: Blackwell
|
|
1
|
Geale, S.K. (2012) The ethics of disaster management. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 21(4): 445-462
|
|
|
Hatzichronoglou, T. (1996) Globalization and competitiveness: Relevant indicators. OECD Science: Technology and Industry Working Papers, 5, 62
|
|
|
Hubbard, D. (2009) The Failure of Risk Management: Why It's Broken and How to Fix It. John Wiley & Sons
|
|
|
International Certification Group (ICG) ISO 22301. http://www.icertgroup.org/portfolio/iso-22301-sistemi-menadzmenta-kontinuitetom-poslovanja/, 15.4.2016
|
|
|
Jovanović, J.I., Radović, V., Radosavljević, M. (2015) Industrijske aktivnosti i ublažavnje posledica NATECH katastrofa u Republici Srbiji. Ecologica, 22 (80), str. 579-582
|
|
|
Kreft, S., Eckstein, D., Dorsch, L., Fischer, L. (2015) Global Climate Risk Index 2016. Germanwatch
|
|
|
Penev, S. (2015) Konkurentnost privrede Republike Srbije u kontekstu procesa EU integracija. u: Strukturne promene u Srbiji - dosadašnji rezultati i perspektive, Beograd: Institut ekonomskih nauka, str. 467-480; Dostupno na http://ebooks.ien.bg.as.rs/31/l/sp_2015_0l.pdf
|
|
|
Radovic, V., Kekovic, Z. (2012) Improving Corporate Sectors Responses to Extreme Weather Events in the Republic of Serbia. u: Caleta D. [ur.] Corporate security in dynamic global environment: Challenges and risks, Ljubljana, Slovenia: Institute for Corporative Security Studies-ICS, str. 215-226
|
|
|
Radović, V., Domazet, S. (2016) Konkurentnost privrede Srbije u kontekstu pretnji od poctojećix vanrednih situacija. Ecologica, u štampi
|
|
|
Raftery, J. (1994) Risk analysis in project management. London: E&FN Spon
|
|
7
|
Schwab, K. (2010) The global competitiveness report 2009-2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum
|
|
6
|
Storper, M. (1997) The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York, itd: Guilford Press
|
|
|
The Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP) (2015) Global terrorism index 2015. 15.4.2016, http://economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/1l/Global-Terrorism-Index-2015.pdf
|
|
|
Thompson, P., Perry, J. (1992) Engineering construction risks: A guide to project risk analysis and risk management. London: Thomas Telford
|
|
2
|
World Economic Forum (2015) The global competitiveness report 2015-2016. Geneva, 15.4.2016., http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2015-2016/
|
|
|
World Economic Forum (2016) The global risks report 2016. Geneva, 15.4.2016., http://wef.ch/risks2016
|
|
|
|
|