Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:9
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:6

Contents

article: 5 from 59  
Back back to result list
2018, vol. 66, iss. 2, pp. 187-219
Composition of the criminal courts
aUniversity of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law
bCriminology and Police Academy, Belgrade

emailvturanjanin@jura.kg.ac.rs, d.cvorovic@sbb.rs
Abstract
The composition of a criminal court stands as one of the most interesting issues in the comparative law. Different viewpoints when it comes to the need of including non-professional citizens in the contemporary criminal procedure have contributed to interesting approaches related to regulating this issue. First of all, there are original jury systems that are a feature related mainly to the Anglo-American legal systems, but whose ideas have found their place in the European legislature as well. Furthermore, there are countries where the trial body stands as a separate authority, which consists of professional judges and lay judges, whereas some of the countries have both professional judges and lay judges, the first being in charge of resolving legal issues, and the second ones being in charge of factual issues. There are many articles devoted to the jury systems in the world, but in a very small proportion of them we could find solutions from the mixed court of the Balkan countries. Mixed court is one of the features continental countries. The authors compare Balkan countries, where Slovenia and Croatia being the European Union Members, whereas the rest of them are in the process of accession. Thereby, some of the countries strive to get their courts become more professional by leaving out citizens non-professional from the composition of trial chamber, while some of them have kept them, whereby the scope of their jurisdiction varies from one country to another. Today, it is a great question whether a mixed court will survive legislative changes, due to the criticism of the jurists and non-jurists.
References
Bejatović, S. (2013) Novi Zakonik o krivičnom postupku - kraj reforme ili samo jedan korak u procesu reforme?. Pravni informator, 16(9)
Bejatović, S., i dr. (2013) Priručnik za primenu Zakonika o krivičnom postupku. Beograd: Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji
Bejatović, S. (2016) Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd: Službeni glasnik, 2016
Bugarski, T. (2016) Uloga porotnika u krivičnom postupku. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu
Bugarski, T. (2014) Sudije porotnici i ocena dokaza po slobodnom sudijskom uverenju. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, vol. 48, br. 3, str. 221-234
Čepulo, D. (2000) Sloboda tiska i porotno suđenje u banskoj Hrvatskoj 1848-1918. godine. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 7(1)
Čvorović, D., Turanjanin, V. (2015) Uloga porote u francuskom krivičnom postupku. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 63, br. 1, str. 217-233
Dudzinski, J. (2013) Justification for Juries: A Comparative Perspective on Models of Jury Composition. University of Illinois Law Review, 4
Elsner, B., Aebi, M., Aubusson, de C.B., Gillieron, G., Hakeri, H., Jehle, J., Killias, M., Lewis, C., Peters, J., Roth, E., Smit, P., Sobota, P., Turkovic, K., Wade, M., Zila, J. (2008) The Criminal Justice Approach: Case Examples. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 14(2-3): 123-132
Fišer, Z. (2015) Tužilac kao subjekat glavnog pretresa - slovenačko zakonodavstvo i iskustva. in: Bejatović S [ed.] Glavni pretres i suđenje u razumnom roku: regionalna krivičnoprocesna zakonodavstva i iskustva u primeni, Beograd: Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji
Hall, D. (2012) Criminal law and procedure. New York: Lawyers Cooperative Publishing
Hans, V. (2006) The twenty-first century jury: Worst of times or best of times?. Criminal Law Brief, 1
Hans, V. (2008) Jury systems around the world. in: Cornell Law Faculty Publications paper 305
Hans, V. (2012) What Difference Does a Jury Make. Yonsei Law Journal, 3
Ilić, G., i dr. (2013) Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku. Beograd: Službeni glasnik, 2013
Ivković, K.S. (1999) Lay participation in criminal trails: The case of Croatia. Austin - Winfield
Jackson, J., Kovalev, N. (2006) Lay adjudication and human rights in Europe. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13(1)
Jimeno-Bulnes, M. (2013) American criminal procedure in a European context. Cardozo Journal of International Law & Comparative Law, 21(2)
Jimeno-Bulnes, M. (2007) A Different Storyline for 12 Angry Men: Verdicts Reached by Majority Rule - The Spanish Perspective. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82(2)
Jovanović, M. (1959) Porota srednjovekovne Srbije. Beograd: Savez udruženja pravnika Jugoslavije
Kalajdžiev, G., Lažetić-Bužarovska, G. (2013) Acceleration of Proceedings - One of the Aims of Criminal Procedure Reform in the Republic of Macedonia. in: Bejatović S. [ed.] Simplified Forms of Procedure in Criminal Matters: Regional Criminal Procedure Legislation and Experiences in Application, Belgrade: OEBS Mission to Serbia
Klajn, I., Šipka, M. (2011) Veliki rečnik stranih reči i izraza. Novi Sad: Prometej
Kolaković-Bojović, M. (2016) Okončanje krivičnog postupka u razumnom roku. Beograd: Pravni fakultet, doktorska disertacija
Kutnjak-Ivkovic, S. (2003) An Inside View: Professional Judges' and Lay Judges' Support for Mixed Tribunals. Law & Policy, 25(2): 93-122
Langbein, J.H. (1981) Mixed Court and Jury Court: Could the Continental Alternative Fill the American Need?. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 6(1): 195
Lažetić, B.G., Kalajdžiev, G. (2015) Glavna rasprava prema ZKP Makedonije (teorija i praksa). in: Bejatović S. [ed.] Glavni pretres i suđenje u razumnom roku: regionalna krivičnoprocesna zakonodavstva i iskustva u primeni, Beograd: Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji
Lažetić-Bužarovska, G., Misoski, B. (2013) Plea Bargaining under the CPC of the Republic of Macedonia. in: Bejatović S. [ed.] Simplified Forms of Procedure in Criminal Matters: Regional Criminal Procedure Legislation and Experiences in Application, Belgrade: OEBS Mission to Serbia
Ljubanović, V. (1983) Sudjelovanje građana u suvremenom jugoslovenskom krivičnom suđenju. Zagreb: Pravni fakultet u Zagrebu, doktorska disertacija
Machura, S. (2011) Silent lay judges: Why their influence in the community falls short of expectations. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 86(2)
Marković, B. (1914) Rasprave iz krivičnog postupka. Beograd: Geca Kon
Matovski, N., Kalajdziev, G. (2014) Efficiency of Prosecutorial Investigation in Contrast to Efficiency of the Defence in Reformed Criminal Procedure (with a particular view on the new Macedonian CPC). in: Prosecutorial Investigation: Regional Criminal Procedure Legislation and Experiences, Belgrade: OEBS Mission to Serbia
Mccord, J., Mccord, S. (2005) Criminal Law and Procedure for the Paralegal. New York: West Legal Studies
Munday, R. (1993) Jury trial, continental style. Legal Studies, 13(02): 204-224
Neubauer, D., Fradella, H. (2018) America's Courts and the Criminal Justice System. Boston: Cengage
Pakes, F.J. (2010) Comparative Criminal Justice. Portland: Willan Publishing
Pastović, D. (2013) Porotno suđenje u Istri prema Zakonu o kaznenom postupku iz 1850. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 20(1)
Pastović, D. (2015) Analiza prakse porotnog suda u Rovinju 1874.-1918. Zagrebačka pravna revija, 4(1)
Pavičić, A. (2005) Sudjelovanje sudaca porotnika u kaznenim postupcima pred Županijskim sudom u Zagrebu. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 12(1)
Pavlović, M. (2015) Sudije porotnici i vladavina prava. Crimen, vol. 6, br. 2, str. 44-58
Piškorec, V. (2003) Suci porotnici u kaznenom postupku, s posebnim osvrtom na sudjelovanje sudaca porotnika u kaznenim postupcima na Općinskom sudu u Koprivnici. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 10(1)
Pizzi, W. (1999) Trials Without Truth: Why Our System of Criminal Trials Has Become an Expensive Failure and What We Need to Rebuild It?. New York - London
Polak, Đ., i dr. (1960) Priručnik za sudije porotnike vojnih sudova. Beograd: Vojnoizdavački zavod JNA
Radulović, D. (2009) Krivično procesno pravo. Podgorica: Pravni fakultet
Radulović, D. (2009) Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku Crne Gore. Podgorica: Pravni fakultet
Samaha, J. (2012) Criminal Procedure, Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Belmont
Seetahal, D. (2001) Commonwealth Caribbean Criminal Practice and Procedure. London, Sydney: Cavendish Publishing Limited
Simović, M.N. (2005) Krivično procesno pravo - uvod i opšti dio. Bihać: Pravni Fakultet
Stubbs-Šugman, K. (2014) The Concept of the Phase of Investigation and Slovenian Criminal Procedure Legislation. in: Bejatović S. [ed.] Prosecutorial Investigation: Regional Criminal Procedure Legislation and Experiences in Application, Belgrade: OEBS Mission to Serbia
Škulić, M. (2016) Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd: Pravni fakultet
Škulić, M. (2007) Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
Thaman, S. (2007) The good, the bad, or the indifferent: 12 angry man in Russia. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82(2)
Thaman, S. (2007) The nullification of the Russian jury: Lessons for jury-inspired reform in Eurasia and beyond. Cornell International Law Journal, 40(2)
Thaman, S.C. (1999) Europe's New Jury Systems: The Cases of Spain and Russia. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62(2): 233
Turanjanin, V. (2011) Uvođenje adversarnog sistema u Rusiji kroz prikaz dva najvažnija instituta: porotu i sporazum o priznanju krivice. Glasnik prava, 3
Turanjanin, V. (2016) Sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela. Kragujevac: Pravni fakultet, doktorska disertacija
Turanjanin, V. (2013) Porotni sistem u Španiji. in: Vlašković B. [ed.] Usklađivanje pravnog sistema Srbije sa standardima Evropske unije, Kragujevac: Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Kragujevcu
Turanjanin, V. (2016) 12 gnevnih ljudi - porota u Rusiji. in: Bejatović S. [ed.] Evropske integracije i kazneno zakonodavstvo (Poglavlje 23 - norma, praksa i mere harmonizacije), Zlatibor: Intermeks - Srpsko udruženje za krivičnopravnu teoriju i praksu
Turanjanin, V. (2015) European Systems of Jury Trials. US-China Law Review, 12(2):
Turanjanin, V. (2011) Sporazum o priznanju krivice u pravu evropskih zemalja - primjer Italije. Strani pravni život, br. 2, str. 147-166
Vasiljević, T., i dr. (1975) Učešće građana u suđenju na teritoriji Socijalističke Autonomne Pokrajine Vojvodine. Novi Sad: Zavod za naučnoistraživački rad Pravnog fakulteta
Važić, S. (2006) Sistem i uloga porote u krivičnom postupku (iskustva u primeni i predlozi de lege ferenda. in: Bejatović S. [ed.] Nova rešenja u krivičnom postupku i dosadašnja iskustva u njihovoj primeni, Zlatibor: Srpsko udruženje za krivičnopravnu teoriju i praksu
 

About

article language: Serbian
document type: Paper
DOI: 10.5937/AlaniPFB1802187T
published in SCIndeks: 13/07/2018
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

No related records