- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:11
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:9
|
|
2022, vol. 19, br. 1, str. 201-216
|
Ekonomski i geopolitički aspekt bilateralnih odnosa EU i Kine
Economic and geopolitical aspect of the EU-China bilateral relations
Projekat: Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije
Sažetak
Očekivan ekonomski rast EU27 i Kine do 2025. će voditi ka daljem povećanju učešća kineske privrede u svetskom BDP-u, te "prestizanja'' evropske ekonomije u 2022. Glavni doprinos ovog rada je predstavljanje i analiza od strane MMF-a projektovanih veličina BDP-a za Kinu i EU27 u periodu 2020-25, te procena uticaja tendencija divergentnog rasta privrednih aktivnosti dva privredna giganta na dalji razvoj njihovih bilateralnih odnosa. Naime, budući da promene u globalnoj ekonomskoj poziciji uzrokuju geopolitičke konsekvence, jasno je da i samo očekivanje ovakvih trendova utiče na odluke političko-ekonomskih aktera danas (kao što je potpisivanje investicionog sporazuma Brisela i Pekinga, uprkos protivljenju Vašingtona). Odgovor EU na snažan rast uticaja Kine bi mogao biti pokušaj da se strateški izazov koji predstavlja Peking, ublaži sa kreiranjem snažnijeg transatlantskog partnerstva, ali nije izvesno da će Vašington biti spreman da ponudi bitnije ustupke Briselu. Alternativni scenario bi mogao podrazumevati jačanje "strateške autonomije'' EU, što bi impliciralo pokušaj samostalnijeg geopolitičkog pozicioniranja, koji bi omogućio bolje odnose sa Kinom te olakšani pristup ogromnom tržištu te zemlje. EU, koja je najveći svetski trgovinski blok i najveći trgovinski partner čak 80 zemalja, će se teško pomiriti sa ulogom objekta u kinesko-američkom nadmetanju i pokušaće da ostvari sinergiju u odnosima sa obe sile.
Abstract
The expected economic growth of the EU27 and China by 2025 will lead to a further increase in the share of the Chinese economy in world GDP and the overtaking of the EU economy in 2022. The main contribution of this paper is the presentation and analysis of IMF projected GDPs for China and the EU27 in the period 2020-25, and assessing the impact of divergent GDP growth trends of the two economic giants on the further development in their bilateral relations. Namely, since the change in the global economic position causes geopolitical consequences, it is clear that the very expectation of such trends influences the decisions of political and economic actors today - such as the signing of the investment agreement between Brussels and Beijing, despite Washington's opposition. The EU's response to China's growing influence could be an attempt to mitigate Beijing's strategic challenge by creating a stronger transatlantic partnership, but it is uncertain that Washington will be willing to offer significant concessions to Brussels. An alternative scenario could involve strengthening the EU's "strategic autonomy", which would imply an attempt at a more independent geopolitical positioning, which would enable better relations with China and easier access to the country's huge market. The EU, the world's largest trading bloc and the largest trading partner of as many as 80 countries, will find it difficult to come to terms with its subordinate role in Sino-US competition and will remain focused on exploring synergies with both powers.
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
*** (2020) IMF's database. October
|
|
Albert, E. (2020) China and the EU: Public-private dissonance. The Diplomat, December 12, 2020, https://thediplomat.com/2020/12/china-andthe-eu-public-private-dissonance
|
|
Bildt, C. (2020) How Europe can live with China. Project Syndicate, Jun 17, 2020, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/europechanging-approach-to-china-engagement-plus-competition-by-carl-bildt2020-06?barrier=accesspaylog
|
|
Bordachev, T. (2019) Forget European defense, think about European security. Valdai Club, 5.12.2019. https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/ forget-european-defense
|
|
Christiansen, T., Kirchner, E., Wissenbach, U. (2019) The European Union and China. Basingstoke: Red Globe Press, xviii, 219 p
|
|
Cutler, W. (2021) An EU China deal for a bygone era. Project Syndicate, Feb 9, 2021. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/eu-china-investment-deal-weaknesses-by-wendy-cutler-2021-02
|
|
Detsch, C. (2021) First time China has accepted any regulation on workers' rights'. Ips-journal, 27.01.2021, https://www.ips-journal.eu/interviews/thefirst-time-that-china-has-accepted-any-regulation-on-workers-rights4936/?utm_campaign=en_857_20210129&utm_medium=email&utm_ source=newsletter
|
|
Hackenbroich, J., Varma, T. (2020) Protecting Europe from economic coercion: Strategy after the 2020 US election. ECFR, 9 December 2020 https://ecfr.eu/article/protecting-europe-from-economic-coercion-strategyafter-the-2020-us-election
|
|
Hall, B. (2020) What an EU-China investment treaty would mean for companies. Financial Times, 23 Dec 2020 https://www.ft.com/content/add9a111-60cc-4b39-9349-3c7db71c7682
|
|
Herrero, G.A. (2020) When and how should the European Union conclude an investment agreement with China?. Bruegel Blog, 17 December. https://www.bruegel.org/2020/12/when-and-how-should-the-europeanunion-conclude-an-investment-agreement-with-china
|
|
Herrero, G.A., Martínez, T.D. (2020) Europe is losing competitiveness in global value chains while China surges. Bruegel, November 27, 2020. https://www.bruegel.org/2020/11/europe-is-losing-competitiveness-in-global-value-chains-while-china-surges
|
|
Herrero, G.A., Wolff, G.B. (2020) China has an unfair advantage in the EU market: What can be done to level the playing field?. Bruegel, July, 28, 2020. https://www.bruegel.org/2020/07/china-hasan-unfair-advantage-in-the-eu-market-what-can-be-done-to-level-the-playing-field
|
|
Julienne, M. (2020) Towards tougher bilateral relations between EU and China. Valdai Club, 18.09.2020 https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/towardsa-tougher-bilateral-relation-between-eu
|
|
Kausikan, B. (2020) Can the EU be a strategic actor?: Personal reflections from Singapore. Valdaiclub, 14.12.2020,https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/can-the-eu-be-a-strategic-actor
|
|
Kluth, A. (2020) The China EU investment deal is a mistake. Bloomberg, December 30, 2020. https://www.bloomberg.com/europe
|
3
|
Lončar, M. (2020) Značaj koncepta 'azijskih vrednosti' za savremene političke sisteme Istočne i Jugoistočne Azije. Megatrend revija, vol. 17, br. 2, str. 65-78
|
|
O'Neill, J. (2021) Reflections on a plague year. Project Syndicate, Feb 10, 2021. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/covid19-consequences-vaccines-digitalization-china-by-jim-o-neill-2021-02
|
|
Reuter, M. (2020) Responding to the China challenge: The state of play on investment screening in Europe. ECFR, 27 November 2020 https://ecfr.eu/article/responding-to-the-china-challenge-the-state-of-play-on-investment-screening-in-europe
|
|
Rodrik, D. (2021) Europe's China Gambit. Project-Syndicate, January 11, 2021. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/what-the-europechina-investment-treaty-can-and-cannot-achieve-by-dani-rodrik-2021-01?a_ la=english&a=&barrier=accesspaylog
|
|
Sam, F., Brunsden, J., Peel, M. (2020) EU proposes fresh alliance with US in face of China challenge. Financial Times, 29 November 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/e8e5cf90-7448-459e-8b9f-6f34f03ab77a
|
|
Sevastopulo, D., Brunsden, J., Fleming, S., Peel, M. (2021) Biden team voices concern over EU-China investment deal. FT, 22 Dec 2020 https://www.ft.com/content/2f0212ab-7e69-4de0-8870-89dd0d414306
|
|
Solana, J., Fernandez, O. (2020) Averting a cold war of choice. Project Sindicate, Jun 18, 2020. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/america-china-averting-cold-war-of-choice-by-javier-solana-and-oscarfernandez-2020-06
|
|
Subacchi, P. (2021) China's debt grip on Africa. Project-Syndicate, January 15, 2021. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/covid19-africadebt-relief-china-by-paola-subacchi-2021-01
|
|
|
|