- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:12
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:7
|
|
|
2020, vol. 8, br. 2, str. 18-30
|
|
Mogućnosti i ograničenja lokalnog ekonomskog razvoja u Srbiji
Possibilities and limitations of local economic development in Serbia
aUniverzitet 'Union - Nikola Tesla', Fakultet za ekonomiju i finansije, Beograd, Srbija bUniverzitet 'Union - Nikola Tesla', Fakultet primenjenih nauka, Niš, Srbija cHigh Business School, Niš dHigh Business School Cacak, Čačak
e-adresa: anicic.dusan@yahoo.com, jasminanesic75@gmail.com, jelicmiloje@gmail.com, milosav.r.stojanovic@gmail.com
Sažetak
Praksa u razvijenim zemljama je pokazala neophodnost za jačim uključivanjem lokalne samouprave u lokalne probleme ekonomskog razvoja. Ekonomski sistem u Srbiji ima odlike visoke stope nezaposlenosti i nizak životni standard stanovništva, i zato se uključivanje lokalne samouprave u većem obimu u lokalne probleme ekonomskog razvoja vidi kao realna mogućnost smanjivanja ovih problema. Iako većina instrumenata ekonomske politike leži u centralnoj nadležnosti vlade, što u velikoj meri ograničava mogućnosti lokalne samouprave, još uvek postoji značajan prostor za uticaj lokalne samouprave na ekonomski razvoj. Postoje brojne prepreke za uspešnu primenu koncepta lokalnog ekonomskog razvoja u Srbiji, što utiče na znatno manje korišćenje opštinskih i regionalnih potencijala nego što mogućnosti dozvoljavaju, i to se negativno odražava naročito na ruralne i nerazvijene oblasti.
Abstract
The practice in developed countries has shown a necessity for local government's stronger inclusion in local economic development issues. The economic system in Serbia has features of high unemployment rate and low living standard among the population, and therefore local government taking a larger part in local economic development issues is seen as a real possibility for reducing these problems. Although most of the economic policy instruments lie within the central government jurisdiction, which largely restricts local government possibilities, there is still an important area for local government influence on economic development. There are numerous obstacles for a successful application of the local economic development concept in Serbia, which causes the municipality and regional potentials to be used much less than the possibilities allow, and it has a negative reflection, especially in rural and undeveloped areas.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
1 
|
Bartik, T.J. (2003) Local economic development policies. u: Upjohn Institute Staff Working Paper, Michigan/USA: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, No. 03-91, Jan. str. 2
|
|
|
Begović, B., Vacić, Z., Matković, G., Mijatović, B. (2006) Local economic development. Belgrade: Center for Liberal-Democratic Studies, str.33
|
|
|
Belkić, V., Hrnjaz, M. (2010) Local economic development: European guidelines to modern local self-government. Belgrade: Citizen Network, p. 11
|
|
2
|
Blakely, E., Bradshaw, T. (2002) Planning local economic development: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, pp.25
|
|
|
Bolton, P. (2007) A guide for strategic planning in towns and municipalities. Belgrade, 8-11
|
|
3
|
Bryant, C., Cofsky, S. (2004) Public policy for local economic development: An international comparison of approaches, programs and tools. u: Research report for Economic Development Canada, Montréal, pp.19
|
|
|
Coulson, A. (1997) Local Economic Development: A Guide to Practice. Birmingham: Birmingham University, str.6
|
|
 
|
Cunningham, S., Meyer-Stamer, J. (2005) Planning or doing local economic development? Problems with the orthodox approach to LED. Africa Insight, 35(4), pp.2
|
|
|
Čapkova, S., ed. (2005) Local Government and Economic Development. Budapest: OSI/LGI, pp.3
|
|
|
Furdell, P. (1994) Poverty and Economic Development: Views from City Hall. Washington,D.C: National League of Cities
|
|
|
Jelić, G., Stojanović, V. (2013) Multiplicity as object of study in contemporary differential geometry. Annals of the Oradea University: Fascicle Management and Technological Engineering, ISSUE-2, pp. 69-72
|
|
|
Ministry of economy (2014) The report on the regional development in Serbia in 2013. Belgrade, December
|
|
1
|
Radovanović, V., Maksimović, M. (2010) Labor market and (un)employment in the European Union and Serbia: Regional aspects. Zbornik radova Geografskog instituta 'Jovan Cvijić', SANU, vol. 60, br. 2, str. 59-75
|
|
|
Radulović, D. (2012) Policies and measures for the regional development in Serbia. u: Measures for overcoming the crisis: Challenges, priorities and risks in the Republic of Serbia and Vojvodina autonomous region 2013-2020, Novi Sad, pp. 67-96
|
|
|
Swinburn, G., Goga, S., Marphy, F. (2006) Local economic development: A primer: Developing and implementing local economic development strategies and action plans. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp.1
|
|
|
Vasiljević, D. (2012) Local economic development: Why are some of the municipalities winners, and the others are losers in the transition. Belgrade: PALGO Center, pp. 37
|
|
3 
|
Vukosavljević, D., Vukosavljević, D., Jelić, G. (2016) The increasing importance of effective risk management in banking: Findings from Serbia. International Review, br. 1-2, str. 101-109
|
|
3
|
Vukotić, S., Aničić, J., Laketa, M. (2013) Clusters as a part of improvement function of Serbian economy real sector competitiveness. Amfiteatru Economic, Vol. XV, No. 33, February, pp. 224-245
|
|
|
World Bank (2001) A Brief History of LED
|
|
2
|
Žikić, M., Mak, D. (2010) Analiza efekata različitih institucionalnih oblika za sprovođenje nadležnosti u oblasti lokalnog ekonomskog razvoja. Beograd: SKGO
|
|
|
|
|