Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:17
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:6

Contents

article: 1 from 32  
Back back to result list
2021, vol. 58, iss. 1, pp. 14-22
Archaeoentomological assessment of weevil (Coleoptera, Bruchidae) infestation level of pea (Pisum sativum) at the Late Bronze Age settlement Hissar
aThe Museum of Vojvodina, Department of Archaeology, Novi Sad
bn/a

emailaleksandar.medovic@muzejvojvodine.org.rs
Keywords: Bruchus pisorum L.; Hissar; infestation; Late Bronze Age; mass find; pea; Pea weevil
Abstract
A find of 2572 charred seeds of pea (Pisum sativum L.) was detected at the Late Bronze Age tell settlement Hissar near Leskovac, in Serbia, belonging to the Brnjica cultural group, 14-10 cent. BC. Two types of pea seeds were observed: apparently healthy seeds and seeds damaged by the activity of a weevil (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). At least two-fifths of all finds have apparently been infested most probably by pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum L.), one of the most important pea pests worldwide, especially in medium-moist and dry climates, such as Southern Europe and Australia. A large amount of infested pea seeds indicates a developed pea production on small plots, strongly indicating that cultivating this ancient pulse crop must have been well-rooted in field conditions. Previous DNA analyses of charred pea placed the ancient Hissar pea at an intermediate position between extantly cultivated pea (P. sativum L. subsp. sativum var. sativum) and a wild, winter hardy, 'tall' pea (P. sativum subsp. elatius (Steven ex M. Bieb.) Asch. et Graebn.). Based on an assumption of its late harvest time and combined with pea weevil life cycle stage in charred seeds, it was possible to estimate the season during which the seeds were carbonized, namely, the second half of July or the first days of August at the latest. Older, final weevil instars were predominant before seed carbonization. The pea infestation rate at Hissar is one of the highest noted among pulses in the Old World and the highest among peas, so far.
References
Annis, B., O'Keeffe, L.E. (1987) Influence of pea genotype on parasitization of the pea weevil, Bruchus pisorum (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) by Eupteromalus leguminis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Environmental Entomology, 16(3): 653-655
Antolín, F., Schäfer, M. (2020) Insect pests of pulse crops and their management in Neolithic Europe. Environmental Archaeology, 1-14
Armstrong, E., Matthews, P. (2005) Managing Pea weevil. Temora: NSW Department of Primary Industries
Börner, H. (1997) Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz. Stuttgart: Ulmer
Braadbaart, F. (2004) Carbonization of peas and wheat: A window into the past: A laboratory study. Heemstede: Gravé
Caracuta, V., Vardi, J., Paz, Y., Boaretto, E. (2017) Farming legumes in the pre-pottery Neolithic: New discoveries from the site of Ahihud (Israel). PLoS One, 12(5): e0177859
Clement, S.L., Hardie, D.C., Elberson, L.R. (2002) Variation among accessions of Pisum fulvum for resistance to pea weevil. Crop Science, 42(6): 2167-2173
Delobel, B., Delobel, A. (2006) Dietary specialization in European species groups of seed beetles (Coleoptera: Bruchidae: Bruchinae). Oecologia, 149(3): 428-443
Dönmez, E.O. (2005) Early Bronze Age crop plants from Yenibademli Höyük (Gökçeada), Western Turkey. Environmental Archaeology, 10(1): 39-49
Filipović, D., Meadows, J., Corso, M.D., Kirleis, W., Alsleben, A., Akeret, Ö., Bittmann, F., Bosi, G., Ciută, B., Dreslerová, D., Effenberger, H., Gyulai, F., Heiss, A.G., Hellmund, M., Jahns, S. (2020) New AMS 14C dates track the arrival and spread of broomcorn millet cultivation and agricultural change in prehistoric Europe. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 13698
Fuller, D.Q. (2007) Contrasting patterns in crop domestication and domestication rates: Recent archaeobotanical insights from the Old World. Annals of Botany, 100(5): 903-924
Gantner, R., Stjepanović, M., Popović, S., Greger, Ž. (2008) Resistance of field pea genotypes (Pisum sativum L.) to the occurrence of pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum L.) in seed. in: Pospišil M. [ed.] 43rd Croatian and 3rd International Symposium on Agriculture, Opatija, Croatia, 18-21 February, Proceedings, 322-325
Hardie, D., Micic, S. (2020) Management of pea weevil. South Perth, Australia: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development - Agriculture and Food, Retrieved from https://agric.wa.gov.au/n/2815
Helbaek, H. (1970) The plant husbandry of Hacilar. in: Mellaart J. [ed.] Excavations at Hacılar, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 189-244
Jermy, T., Szentesi, Á. (2003) Evolutionary aspects of host plant specialisation: A study on bruchids (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Oikos, 101(1): 196-204
Kaplin, V.G. (2020) Distribution and biology of invasive species of pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum). Russian Journal of Biological Invasions, 11(1): 21-30
Kaplin, V.G., Katyuk, A.I., Vasin, V.G., Belousova, O.A., Vasin, A.V. (2019) Development and harmfulness of the pea weevil, Bruchus pisorum (L.), in the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga Region. Entomological Review, 99(5): 580-597
Kavallieratos, N.G., Stanković, S.S., Schwarz, M., Alissandrakis, E., Athanassiou, C.G., Floros, G.D., Žikić, V. (2019) A survey of parasitoids from Greece with new associations. ZooKeys, 817: 25-40
Kereši, T., Konjević, A., Popović, A. (2019) Posebna entomologija 2. Novi Sad: Faculty of Agriculture
Kergoat, G.J., Silvain, J., Delobel, A., Tuda, M., Anton, K. (2007) Defining the limits of taxonomic conservatism in host-plant use for phytophagous insects: Molecular systematics and evolution of host-plant associations in the seed-beetle genus Bruchus Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 43(1): 251-269
Khrolinskii, L.G., Malakhanov, Yu.A. (1979) Triaspis and the pea bruchid. Zashchita Rastenii, 10: 39-39
Kislev, M.E. (1991) Archaeobotany and storage archaeoentomology. in: Renfrew J.M. [ed.] New light on ancient farming, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 121-136
Kislev, M.E., Melamed, Y. (2000) Ancient infested wheat and horsebean at Horbat Rosh Zait. in: Gal Z; Alexandre Y. [ed.] Horbat Rosh Zayit: An Iron Age storage fort and village, Jerusalem: Israel Antiquities Authority, pp. 206-220
Kosterin, O.E., Bogdanova, V.S., Mglinets, A.V. (2020) Wild pea (Pisum sativum L. subsp. elatius (Bieb.) Aschers. et Graebn. s.l.) at the periphery of its range: Zagros Mountains. Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding, 24(1): 60-68
Kroll, H. (1983) Kastanas. Ausgrabungen in einem Siedlungshügel der Bronze und Eisenzeit Makedoniens 1975-1979. Die Pflanzenfunde. Berlin: Verlag Volker Spiess GmbH
Kroll, H., Reed, K. (2016) Die Archäobotanik. Würzburg: Würzburg University Press
Medović, A., Mikić, A. (2014) Archaeobotanical findings of annual and other legumes in Serbia. Legume Perspectives, 5: 5-6
Medović, A. (2012) Late Bronze Age plant economy at the early Iron Age hill fort settlement Hissar?. Work of the Museum of Vojvodina, 54, 105-118
Medović, A., Mikić, A., Ćupina, B., Jovanović, Ž., Radović, S., Nikolić, A., Stanisavljević, N. (2011) Pisum & Ervilia Tetovac: Made in Early Iron Age Leskovac, Part one: Two charred pulse crop storages of the fortified hill fort settlement Hissar in Leskovac, South Serbia. Ratarstvo i povrtarstvo, vol. 48, br. 1, str. 219-226
Mikić, A., Ćupina, B., Zlatković, B., Smýkal, P., Antanasović, S., Đorđević, V., Medović, A., Krstić, Đ., Mihailović, V. (2014) Collecting, characterisation and evaluation of 'tall' pea (Pisum sativum subsp. elatius) in southeastern Serbia. Legume Perspectives, 5, 19-22
Nikolova, I. (2016) Pea weevil damage and chemical characteristics of pea cultivars related to Bruchus Pisorum L. tolerance. Russian Journal of Ecology, 47(3): 302-309
Nikolova, I.M. (2016) Response of pea varieties to damage degree of pea weevil, Bruchus pisorum L. Scientifica, 2016: 1-7
Oybak, E., Demirci, Ş. (1997) Early Bronze Age plant remains from İmamoğlu Höyük, SE Turkey. Anatolian Studies, 47: 173-176
Panagiotakopulu, E. (2001) New records for ancient pests: Archaeoentomology in Egypt. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28(11): 1235-1246
Panagiotakopulu, E., Buckland, P.C., Day, P.M., Doumas, C. (1995) Natural insecticides and insect repellents in antiquity: A review of the evidence. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22, 705-710
Panagiotakopulu, E., Higham, T., Sarpaki, A., Buckland, P., Doumas, C. (2013) Ancient pests: The season of the Santorini Minoan volcanic eruption and a date from insect chitin. Naturwissenschaften, 100(7): 683-689
Panel on Plant Health (2014) Scientific Opinion on the pest categorisation of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). EFSA Journal, 12(10): 3833-3833
Reddy, G.V.P., Sharma, A., Gadi, R.L. (2018) Biology, ecology, and management of the pea weevil (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 111(4): 161-171
Riehl, S. (1999) Bronze Age environment and economy in the Troad: The archaeobotany of Kumtepe and Troy. Tübingen: Mo Vince Verlag
Ritcher, P.O. (1966) Biological control of insects and weeds in Oregon. Corvallis: Oregon State University - Agricultural Experiment Station
Schlumbaum, A., Tensen, M., Jaenicke-Després, V. (2008) Ancient plant DNA in archaeobotany. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 17: 233-244
Schmale, I., Wäckers, F.L., Cardona, C., Dorn, S. (2005) How host larval age, and nutrition and density of the parasitoid Dinarmus basalis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) influence control of Acanthoscelides obtectus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 95(2): 145-150
Smith, A.M. (1990) Pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum L.) and crop loss: Implications for management. in: Fujii K; Gatehouse A.M.R; Johnson C.D; Mitchel R; Yoshida T. [ed.] Bruchids and legumes: Economics, ecology and coevolution, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 105-114
Smýkal, P., Jovanović, Ž., Stanisavljević, N., Zlatković, B., Ćupina, B., Đorđević, V., Mikić, A., Medović, A. (2014) A comparative study of ancient DNA isolated from charred pea (Pisum sativum L.) seeds from an Early Iron Age settlement in southeast Serbia: Inference for pea domestication. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 61(8): 1533-1544
Staub, M. (1882) Prähistorische Pflanzen aus Ungarn. Botanische Jahrbücher fur Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie, 3, 281-287
Stojić, M., Pešić, J., Jović, S. (2007) Kulturna stratigrafija arheološkog lokaliteta Hisar u Leskovcu. Leskovački zbornik (The Leskovac Anthology), br. 47, str. 29-40
Threadgold, J., Brown, T.A. (2003) Degradation of DNA in artificially charred wheat seeds. Journal of Archaeological Science, 30(8): 1067-1076
Tsialtas, I.T., Theologidou, G.S., Bilias, F., Irakli, M., Lazaridou, A. (2020) Ex situ evaluation of seed quality and bruchid resistance in Greek accessions of red pea (Lathyrus cicera L.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 67(4): 985-997
Tuda, M. (2011) Evolutionary diversification of bruchine beetles: Climate-dependent traits and development associated with pest status. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 101(4): 415-422
Wallace, M., Jones, G., Charles, M., Forster, E., Stillman, E., Bonhomme, V., Livarda, A., Osborne, C.P., Rees, M., Frenck, G., Preece, C. (2019) Re-analysis of archaeobotanical remains from pre and early agricultural sites provides no evidence for a narrowing of the wild plant food spectrum during the origins of agriculture in southwest Asia. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 28(4): 449-463
Weiss, E., Kislev, M.E., Hartmann, A. (2006) Autonomous cultivation before domestication. Science, 312(5780): 1608-1610
Zaytseva, O.O., Bogdanova, V.S., Mglinets, A.V., Kosterin, O.E. (2017) Refinement of the collection of wild peas (Pisum L.) and search for the area of pea domestication with a deletion in the plastidic psbA-trnH spacer. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 64(6): 1417-1430
 

About

article language: English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/ratpov58-31204
received: 08/03/2021
accepted: 17/04/2021
published in SCIndeks: 29/04/2021
peer review method: double-blind
Creative Commons License 4.0