• citations in SCIndeks: [2]
  • citations in CrossRef:[4]
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:7
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:6


article: 1 from 5  
Back back to result list
2015, vol. 43, iss. 4, pp. 370-376
Influence of firms' environmental management and community involvement programs in their employees and in the community
aISEP-IPP and CIDEM School of Engineering, Polytechnic of Porto, Portugal
bBureau Veritas Certification, Portugal
Keywords: Environmental management systems; ISO 14001; Environmental involvement programs; community involvement programs; employee involvement; community feedback; small and medium companies
To assure enduring success, firms need to generate economic value with respect for the environment and social value. They also need to be aware of the needs and expectations of relevant stakeholders and incorporate them in their business strategies and programs. These challenges imply that engineers should take into consideration societal, health and safety, environmental and commercial issues in their professional activity. This investigation accesses the influence of firms' environmental management programs and community involvement programs on their own employees and in the community, with a focus on small and medium companies. Based on a quantitative research, the findings suggest that firms that invest both in environmental management programs and in community involvement programs have a higher involvement of their own employees with the community, while at the same time receiving more feedback (positive, but also negative) from the community, stressing the need to pay special attention to their communication policies.
Ashforth, B.E., Gibbs, B.W. (1990) The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2): 177-194
Bansal, P., Roth, K. (2000) Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 717-736
Brammer, S., Millington, A., Rayton, B. (2007) The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10): 1701-1719
Carroll, A.B. (1998) The Four Faces of Corporate Citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100-101(1): 1-7
Duarte, A.P., Mouro, C., Neves, J.G.das (2010) Corporate social responsibility: mapping its social meaning. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 8(2): 101-122
Elkington, J. (1997) Cannibals with Forks. The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. London: New Society Publishers
EUR-ACE - European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education (2015) Framework standards and guidelines.
Ferro, R.L. (2014) Management systems from 9K, 14K, 18K to SR (26K): its influence on risk management and organizational competitive factors. Lisbon: UAL-Lisbon Autonomous University, Ph. D. thesis
Fonseca, L.M. (2015) ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems through the Lens of Organizational Culture. Quality, Access to Success, Vol. 16, No. 148, pp. 54-59
Fonseca, L.M. (2015) Strategic Drivers for Implementing Sustainability Programs in Portuguese Organizations–Let’s Listen to Aristotle: From Triple to Quadruple Bottom Line. Sustainability: The Journal of Record, 8(3): 136-142
Fonseca, L.M.C.M.da (2015) ISO 14001:2015: An improved tool for sustainability. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 8(1)
Freeman, C.H. (1984) Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman
Hillary, R. (2004) Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(6): 561-569
International Organization for Standardization (2015) ISO 14001.2015 international standard, environmental management systems: Requirements with guidance for use. Geneva
International Organization for Standardization (2015) The ISO survey 2014. Geneva: ISO Central Secretariat,
International Organization for Standardization (2010) ISO 26000: 2010 international standard: Guidance on social responsibility. Geneva
Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. (2003) Nature of corporate responsibilities. Journal of Business Research, 56(1): 55-67
Martín-Peña, M.L., Díaz-Garrido, E., Sánchez-López, J.M. (2014) Analysis of benefits and difficulties associated with firms' Environmental Management Systems: the case of the Spanish automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 70: 220-230
Morsing, M., Schultz, M. (2006) Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, vol. 15 (4), str. 323-338
Pestana, A.H., Gajeiro, J.N. (2008) Data analysis for Social Sciences with SPSS (Análise de Dados para as Ciências Sociais - A Complementaridade do SPSS). Lisbon: Edições Silabo
Porter, M., van der Linde, C. (1995) Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, Sep-Oct, 73 (5), 120-134
Porter, M.E., Kramer, M. (2011) Creating Shared value. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 89, No. 1/2, pp. 62-67
Russo, M.V., Fouts, P.A. (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3): 534
Russo, M.V. (2009) Explaining the impact of ISO 14001 on emission performance: a dynamic capabilities perspective on process and learning. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(5): 307-319
Tarí, J.J., Molina-Azorín, J.F., Heras, I. (2012) Benefits of the ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 standards: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 5(2)
UNESCO (2010) Engineering: Issues challenges and opportunities for development.
United Nation (1997) Weced report (brundtland), our common future.


article language: English
document type: unclassified
DOI: 10.5937/fmet1504370F
published in SCIndeks: 30/03/2016
Creative Commons License 4.0