Actions

Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
how to cite this article
share this article

Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:0
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:0

Contents

article: 4 from 12  
Back back to result list
2013, vol. 61, iss. 3, pp. 135-150
Administrative reform and debates over public agencies' role in Serbia
aInstitute of Social Sciences, Belgrade
bUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy

emailmarko_milenkovic@hotmail.com, milmil@f.bg.ac.rs
Project:
Perspectives of Implementing European Standards in the Serbian Legal System (MESTD - 179059)
Identity Politics of the European Union: Customisation and Application in the Republic of Serbia (MESTD - 177017)

Keywords: Public agencies; Administrative law; European integration; Anthropology of state; Public perception of law
Abstract
Over the past 10 years, there has been a proliferation of agencies in the Serbian public sector with varying degrees of independence and delegation by the government. Agencification in Serbia has been rarely discussed in scholarship, and in most recent public debates it is often criticized as being 'an unnecessary budgetary burden', a 'grave threat to democracy' and the 'party-based atomization of state administration '. In the context in which Serbia is in need of a larger government in order to consolidate democracy, improve respect for human rights and enhance economic development, the agencies have also become collateral public damage from the mantra of the 'requirement to save'. Having in mind that Serbian economic and political development over the past decades has been more than troublesome, this article looks into the public perception of agencification and related political debates, including some policy proposals. The article offers preliminary explanations of possible causes of the specific perception of agencies in the Serbian public, as well as an account of the consequences of current perceptions of agencification. Special emphasis is put on the de-legitimization of the authority of scientific knowledge in society.
References
*** (2001) Governmnent of Serbia, Decree on the General Secretariat and Other Services of the Government. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 21
*** (2006) Constitution of the Republic of Serbia: The national assembly of the Republic of Serbia. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, br. 83
*** (2005/2007) National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia, Law on Public Agencies. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 18/2005, 81/2007
*** (2005-2009) Law on civil servants. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, br. 79/2005, 81/2005-cor., 83/2005-cor., 64/2007, 67/2007-cor., 116/2008, 104/2009
B92 (2011) Serbia is a record holder in a number of agencies. http://www.b92.net/biz/vesti/srbija.php?yyyy=2011&mm=12&dd=17&nav_id=566448, in Serbian
Balinovac, Z. (2006) Overview of the Public Agencies Act. in: Z. Balinovac and J. Damjanović [ed.] The government and state administration system in the Republic of Serbia-compilation of laws and explanatory articles, Belgrade: Dial, Grafolik
Banerjee, S.B., Linstead, S. (2001) Globalization, Multiculturalism and Other Fictions: Colonialism for the New Millennium?. Organization, 8(4): 683-722
Bieber, F. (2003) The Serbian Opposition and Civil Society: Roots of the Delayed Transition in Serbia. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 1: 73-90
Boas, M., Mcneill, D. (2004) Global Institutions and Development: Framing the World?. London: Routledge
Dimitrijević, P. (2012) Public agencies in Serbia. in: TED conference, 1-3 February, Budapest, http://ted-dialogues.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/dimitrijevic_ShortProp.pdf
Escobar, A. (1995) Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Everson, M. (1995) Independent Agencies: Hierarchy Beaters?. European Law Journal, 1(2): 180-204
Gilardi, F. (2002) Policy credibility and delegation to independent regulatory agencies: a comparative empirical analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(6): 873-893
Government of Serbia (2004) Government Strategy of Reform of Public Administration. Belgrade
Government of Serbia (2004) Public administration reform strategy. Belgrade
Holden, P. (2009) In search of structural power: EU aid policy as a global political instrument. Farnham Ashgate Publishing
Holmes, R.D., Marcus, E.G. (2008) Cultures of expertise and the management of globalization: Toward the re-functioning of ethnography. in: Ong A., S.J. Collier [ed.] Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd
Laking, R. (2005) Agencies: Their Benefits and Risks. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 4(4): 7-25
Lilić, S. (2010) Javne agencije i upravna reforma. in: Taboroši S. [ed.] Razvoj pravnog sistema Srbije i harmonizacija sa pravom EU, Belgrade: Faculty of Law, in Serbian
Majone, G. (1994) The rise of the regulatory state in western Europe. West European Politics, 17/77
Marks, G. (2008) The EUs direct democratic surplus. EUSA Review
Martinović, A. (2006) Reform of the state administration in the process of state's political and economic transition. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, vol. 40, br. 2, str. 155-176
Milenković, M. (2010) The Adoption of European Standards in the Sphere of Economic Law and (Anticipated) Cultural Change in Serbia. Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology, 1: 111-135
Milenković, M. (2013) Serbia and the European Union: Is ‘culturalization of accession criteria on the way?. in: Laursen F. [ed.] EU Enlargement Current Challenges and Strategic Choices, Brussels: P.I.E. Lang, forthcoming
Miller, N.J. (1997) A failed transition: the case of Serbia. in: Dawisha Karen and Parrott Bruce [ed.] Politics, Power and the Struggle for Democracy in South-East Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, str. 146-188
Moravcsik, A. (2002) Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4): 603-624
Mosse, D. (2007) Anti-social anthropology?: Objectivity, objection, and the ethnography of public policy and professional communities. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 12, 4: 935-956
Pešić, V. (2007) State capture and widespread corruption in Serbia. in: CEPS Working Documents no. 262, www.aei.pitt.edu/11664/1/1478.pdf
Peters, B.G. (2011) The politics and management of agencies. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, Special Issue, (8)
Petit, N. (2004) The development of agencies at EU and national levels: Conceptual analysis and proposals for reform. BYU School of law, Jean Monnet Working Paper 01
Pollit, C., Bathgate, K., Caulfield, J., Smullen, A., Talbot, C. (2001) Agency fever? Analysis of an international policy fashion. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 3(3): 271-290
Rabrenović, A., Vukašinović-Radojčić, Z. (2009) Civil service reform in Serbia-overcoming implementation challenges. in: Milošević M. [ed.] Serbian law in transition-changes and challenges, Belgrade: Institute of Comparative Law
Razack, S. (1998) Looking White People in the Eye: Gender, Race, and Culture in Courtrooms and Classrooms. Toronto: University of Toronto Press
Sigma (2009) Serbia Administrative Legal Framework Assessment, May 2009. Paris, 3-4
Strauss, P. (1984) The place of agencies in government: separation of powers and the fourth branch. Columbia Law Review, 3: 573-633
Tomić, Z.R. (2008) Upravne i javne agencije u Srbiji - klasifikacija i pravni položaj. Pravo i privreda, vol. 45, br. 5-8, str. 413-426
US Aid Background information about Serbias independent agencies. 1-3, http://serbia.usaid.gov/upload/documents/jrga/Background%20information%20about%20Independent%20Agencies.pdf
 

About

article language: English
document type: Paper
published in SCIndeks: 20/03/2014

Related records

No related records