Metrics

  • citations in SCIndeks: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:23
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:19

Contents

article: 1 from 24  
Back back to result list
2021, vol. 93, iss. 4, pp. 957-993
The relationship between lis pendens and exclusive international jurisdiction based on a choice of court agreement in the law of the Hague Conference and Bosnia and Herzegovina
Osnovni sud u Zvorniku, Zvornik, Bosna i Hercegovina

emailadispoljic@yahoo.com
Keywords: lis pendens; jurisdiction; agreement; contracted jurisdiction; stay of proceedings
Abstract
The subject of the paper refers to the analysis of the exercise of the will of the contracting parties regarding the jurisdiction of the court in the law of the Hague Conference and Bosnia and Herzegovina. The exercise of the will of the contracting parties may be limited by the institute of lis pendens, which makes it impossible to conduct two proceedings between the same parties simultaneously for the same claim based on the same facts, giving priority to the first one, regardless of agreed-upon international jurisdiction. By agreeing on the jurisdiction, the contracting parties decide which court will resolve their dispute, which is extremely important for them. Based on the analysis of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, it is concluded that preference is given to proceedings before the chosen court, with certain exceptions when the agreement of the parties will not apply. The law of Bosnia and Herzegovina applies the rules of lis pendens which may prevent the application of the agreement of the parties.
References
*** (2005) The Hague convention on choice of court agreements from 30. 6
*** (2003-2008) Civil procedure law of the RS. Official Gazette of the RS, no. 58/03, 85/03, 74/05, 63/07, 105/08 - decision of the Constitutional Court of the RS, 45/09 - decision of the Constitutional Court of the RS, 49/09 and 61/13
*** (2003-2015) Civil procedure law of the FBiH. Official Gazette of the FBiH, no. 53/03, 73/05, 19/06 and 98/15
*** (1982) Law on resolving conflicts of law with regulations of other countries. Official Gazette of the SFRJ, no. 43 and 72
*** (2004-2016) Civil procedure law before a court in BiH. no. 36/04, 84/07, 58/13 and 94/16
*** (2018) Civil procedure law of BDBiH. Official Gazette of BDBiH, no. 28
Adler, M., Zarychta, M.C. (2006) The Hague Convention on choice of court agreements: The United States joins the judgment enforcement band. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 27(1): 1-38
Čalija, B., Omanović, S. (2000) Građansko procesno pravo. Sarajevo: Faculty of Law of the University of Sarajevo
Čizmić, J. (2009) Komentar Zakona o parničnom postupku Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine. Sarajevo: Privredna štampa
Čolović, V. (2012) Međunarodno privatno pravo. Banja Luka: Pan-European University APERION
Day, J. (2015) The Hague Choice of court convention takes effect, and with it greater certainty for international transactions. Washington: Jones Day
Dika, M., Knežević, G., Stojanović, S. (1991) Komentar Zakona o međunarodnom privatnom i procesnom pravu. Belgrade: Nomos
Grušić, U. (2007) Dejstvo prorogacionih sporazuma u evropskom, engleskom i srpskom pravu. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 55, br. 2, str. 156-179
Huseinbegović, A., Haubrich, V. (2017) Litispendencija prema građanskom procesnom pravu Evropske unije. Revija za pravo i ekonomiju, 18(1): 9-28
Khatri, B. (2016) The effectiveness of the Hague convention on choice of court agreements in making international commercial cross-border litigation easier: A critical analysis. Victoria: University of Wellington
Laguardia, D.H.R., Falge, S., Franceschi, H. (2012) The Hague Convention on choice of court agreements a discussion of foreign and domestic points. Retrieved on 11. 3. 2017. Available at: http://www.shearman.com/~/media/Files/NewsInsights/ Publications/2012/07/The-Hague-Convention-on-Choice-of-Court-Agreemen__/ Files/ View-full-article-The-Hague-
Lando, O., Nielsen, P.A. (2008) The Rome I regulation. Common Market Law Review, 45: 1687-1725
Min, Y.T. (2005) Report of the law reform committee on the Hague Convention on choice of court agreements. Singapore: Singapore Academy of Law
Moore, C., Jedrey, N., Rodgers, K. (2016) Hague Convention on choice of court agreements enters into force. Business Law Review, 37(1): 2-6
Muminović, E. (2008) Procesno međunarodno privatno pravo. Sarajevo: Faculty of Law of the University of Sarajevo
Musseva, B. (2016) Opposability of choice-of-court agreements against third parties under the Hague choice-of-court Convention and Brussels ibis regulation. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Zenica, 9(18). 69-91
Nanda, V. (2007) The landmark 2005 Hague Convention on choice of court agreements. Texas International Law Journal, 42(3): 773-788
Sources, G.R. (2016) Mining for justice in home country courts: A Canada-UK comparison of access to remedy for victims of human rights violations. Retrieved on 19. 3. 2017. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=2882826
Stanivuković, M., Živković, M. (2010) Međunarodno privatno pravo. Belgrade: Službeni glasnik
Stanivuković, M. (2012) Haška konvencija o izboru nadležnog suda - kritička procena. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, vol. 46, br. 3, str. 121-140
van Loon, H. (2016) The 2005 Hague Convention on choice of court agreementsan introduction. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Zenica, 9(18): 11-29
van Loon, H. (2007) The Hague Conference on private international law. 2(2): 3-12
Varadi, T., Knežević, G., Bordaš, B., Pavić, V. (2016) Međunarodno privatno pravo. Belgrade: Faculty of Law of the University of Belgrade, 15. ed
Wagner, R. (2011) Značaj Haške konferencije za međunarodno privatno pravo za međunarodnu saradnju u građanskim stvarima. Nova pravna revija, 2(2): 45-50
Weller, M. (2016) Choice of forum agreements under the Brussels i recast and under the Hague Convention: Coherences and clashes. Retrieved on 21. 3. 2017. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2827711
 

About

article language: Serbian
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/gakv93-28341
received: 10/09/2020
revised: 17/02/2021
accepted: 06/09/2021
published in SCIndeks: 01/01/2022
peer review method: double-blind
Creative Commons License 4.0