- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[
 ]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:3
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:1
|
|
|
2019, vol. 53, br. 3, str. 757-784
|
|
Neplaćanje predujma za arbitražne troškove u ICSID-ovoj arbitraži
Default in payment of the advance on costs in ICSID arbitration
Sažetak
Karakteristika je arbitraže da stranke unapred predujmljuju iznose potrebne za rešavanje svog spora. Dešava se ipak da tuženi u arbitražnom postupku ne plati svoj deo predujma za troškove spora, i tako stavi tužioca u situaciju da sam finansira arbitražu. Nešto je ređa pojava da tužilac koji je pokrenuo spor ne plati svoj deo predujma. Predmet ispitivanja u ovom radu su posledice propuštanja tuženog da položi svoj deo predujma za troškove spora u investicionoj arbitraži koju organizuje ICSID - Međunarodni centar za rešavanje investicionih sporova u Vašingtonu. Prvo je izloženo, poređenja radi, kakve su posledice propuštanja tuženog prema drugim arbitražnim pravilima koja se takođe koriste u investicionoj arbitraži. Zatim je razmotrena mogućnost da arbitražni sud u ICSID-ovom postupku tužiocu koji je položio celokupni predujam delimičnom arbitražnom odlukom dosudi onaj deo predujma koji je trebalo da plati tuženi ili da odredi privremenu meru kojom se tuženi obavezuje da vrati tužiocu iznos koji je uplatio umesto njega. Na kraju se ispituje mogućnost da se u konačnoj arbitražnoj odluci, pri odmeravanju nadoknadivih troškova u arbitraži, uzme u obzir i činjenica da tuženi nije položio predujam ili da ga nije blagovremeno ili u celosti položio.
Abstract
This paper examines the consequences of the respondent's default in payment of the advance on costs in investment arbitration administered by the ICSID. First, it explores the consequences of the respondent's default pursuant to other arbitration rules also used in investment arbitration. Then it examines the possibilities for an arbitral tribunal in ICSID proceedings to award the claimant the substitute payment it made for the respondent in a decision or order prior to the final award. Finally, the paper discusses the possibility for the tribunal to take into account the respondent's default by apportioning costs in the final award.
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
  
|
Altenkirch, M., Frohloff, J. (2018) The advance on costs in investment arbitration. ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, 33(3): 723-735, Fall
|
|
|
Bondar, K. (2016) Allocation of costs in investor-state and commercial arbitration: Towards a harmonized approach. Arbitration International, 32(1): 45-58
|
|
|
Bühler, M. (2006) Non-payment of the advance on costs by the respondent party: Is there really a remedy?. ASA Bulletin, 24, br. 2, 290
|
|
|
Caron, D., Caplan, N. (2013) The UNCITRAL arbitration rules: A commentary. Oxford University Press
|
|
|
Commission, J., Moloo, R. (2018) Procedural issues in international investment arbitration: Investment claims. u: Oxford International Arbitration Series
|
|
|
Diel-Gligor, K. (2017) Towards consistency in international investment jurisprudence: A preliminary ruling system for ICSID arbitration. Brill
|
|
|
Donovan, D.F. (2015) Allocation of costs. u: Kinnear Meg; Fischer Geraldine R; et al. [ur.] Building international investment law: The first 50 years of ICSID, Kluwer Law International, 558-559
|
|
|
Đajić, S. (2012) Mapping the good faith principle in international investment arbitration: Assessment of its substantive and procedural value. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, vol. 46, br. 3, str. 207-233
|
|
|
Fischer, E., Peter, F. (2017) Costs Follow Conduct: A Musical Altercation. Kluwer Arbitration Blog, October 26, http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2017/10/26/costs-follow-conduct-musical-altercation/
|
|
|
Hodgson, M. (2014) Costs in investment treaty arbitration: The case for reform. Transnational Dispute Management Journal, 11, 1, 2
|
|
|
Jovanović, M. (2017) Ključne odlike finansiranja troškova arbitraže od trećih lica. Pravo i privreda, vol. 55, br. 4-6, str. 493-509
|
|
|
Kalderimis, D.R., Rubins, N., et al. (2015) ICSID Convention: Apportionment of expenses. u: Mistelis Loukas A. [ur.] Concise international arbitration, Kluwer Law International, Chapter VI, Article 61, 163
|
|
|
Kaplan, N. (2015) Non-payment of advances on costs: No pay can play?. u: Caron David D; Schill Stephan W; Cohen Smutny Abbey; Triantafilou Epaminontas E. [ur.] Practicing virtue: Inside international arbitration, Oxford
|
|
|
Reed, L. (2011) Allocation of Costs in International Arbitration. ICSID Review - FILJ, 26(1): 76-87
|
|
|
Rubins, N. (2003) The allocation of costs and attorney's fees in investor-state arbitration. ICSID Review - FILJ, 18(1): 109-129
|
|
2
|
Schreuer, C.H., Malintoppi, L., Reinisch, A., Sinclair, A. (2009) The ICSID Convention: A Commentary. Cambridge University Press
|
|
|
Sullivan, J., Ingle, D. (2015) Interim costs orders: The Tribunal's tool to encourage procedural economy. u: Kalicki Jean E; Joubin-Bret Anna [ur.] Reshaping the investor-state dispute settlement system, Brill
|
|
|
Turner, P., Mohtashami, R. (2009) A guide to the LCIA arbitration rules. Oxford University Press
|
|
|
|
|