2012, vol. 49, br. 4-6, str. 251-271
|
Određeni pravni aspekti zaštite prava zaposlenih u postupcima privatizacije i stečaja
Certain legal aspects of employees' rights in privatization and bankruptcy
Agencija za privatizaciju
Sažetak
U ovom članku autor će analizirati posebne instrumente zaštite prava zaposlenih koji se primenjuju u postupcima privatizacije i stečaja. U radu će biti prikazani određeni problemi u ostvarivanju prava zaposlenih koji su proistekli iz primene privatizacionih i stečajnih propisa. Težište razmatranja biće stavljeno na zakonsku zabranu prinudnog izvršenja protiv subjekata privatizacije koji su u postupku restrukturiranja. S tim u vezi, u radu je ukazano na specijalni pravni režim koji imaju potraživanja iz radnog odnosa prema društvenim preduzećima koja su utvrđena domaćim sudskim odlukama. U praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava ova potraživanja su dobila karakter posebno zaštićenih potraživanja, imajući u vidu da je sud uveo princip odgovornosti Republike Srbije za neizmirene obaveze društvenih preduzeća prema zaposlenima. Izvršenje presuda Evropskog suda za ljudska prava zahtevalo je određene intervencije u zakonodavnoj i sudskoj praksi. Ocena autora je da preduzete mere nisu na adekvatan način rešile postojeće probleme.
Abstract
In this article the author will analyze the specific instruments protecting the rights of employees, applicable in the privatization and bankruptcy. The article will present certain problems in realisation of employees' rights and claims arising from the implementation of privatization and bankruptcy rules. The emphasis will be placed on the consideration of the legal ban on enforcement against companies that are in the privatization process of restructuring. In this regard, the author points out the special legal regime of claims arising from employment against socially-owned companies which are in the privatization process of restructuring. Having regard the non-enforcement of numerous domestic final judgments given in the favour of employees against socially-owned enterprises, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that there exists the responsibility of the state for unsettled claims against original debtors and ordered Serbia to pay what was owed in accordance with the domestic judgements. Enforcement of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights requested the intervention in domestic legislation and court practice. The author deems that those measures would not be effective in resolving above mentioned issues.
|